The Art of War is an ancient
Chinese military treatise dating from the
Spring and Autumn period. The work, which is attributed to the ancient Chinese military strategist
Sun Tzu ("Master Sun", also spelled Sunzi), is composed of 13 chapters. Each one is devoted to a distinct aspect of
warfare and how that applies to
military strategy and
tactics. For almost 1,500 years it was the lead text in an anthology that would be formalised as the
Seven Military Classics by
Emperor Shenzong of Song in 1080.
The Art of War remains the most influential strategy text in East Asian warfare. It has a profound influence on both Eastern and Western military thinking, business tactics, legal strategy and beyond.
The book was first translated and published into French in 1772 (re-published in 1782) by the French
Jesuit Jean Joseph Marie Amiot and a partial translation into English was attempted by British officer Everard Ferguson Calthrop in 1905 under the title
The Book of War. The first annotated English translation was completed and published by
Lionel Giles in 1910.
[2] Numerous military and political leaders such as the Chinese communist revolutionary
Mao Zedong, Japanese daimyo
Takeda Shingen, and American military general
Norman Schwarzkopf, Jr. have drawn inspiration from the book.
History[edit]
Text and commentaries[edit]
The Art of War is traditionally attributed to a military general from the late 6th century BC known as "Master Sun" (
Sunzi or
Sun Tzu), though its earliest parts probably date to at least 100 years later.
Sima Qian's 1st century BC work
Records of the Grand Historian (
Shiji), the first of China's
24 dynastic histories, records an early Chinese tradition stating that a text on military matters was written by a "Sun Wu" from the
State of Qi, and that this text had been read and studied by
King Helü of Wu (r. 514–495 BC). This text was traditionally identified with the received
Master Sun's Art of War. The conventional view—which is still widely held in China—was that Sun Wu was a military theorist from the end of the
Spring and Autumn period (776–471 BC) who fled his home state of Qi to the southeastern
kingdom of Wu, where he is said to have impressed the king with his ability to train even dainty palace ladies in warfare and to have made Wu's armies powerful enough to challenge their western rivals in the
state of Chu.
The prominent strategist, poet, and warlord
Cao Cao in the early 3rd century AD authored the earliest known commentary to the
Art of War. Cao's preface makes clear that he edited the text and removed certain passages, but the extent of his changes were unclear historically.
The Art of War appears throughout the bibliographical catalogs of the Chinese dynastic histories, but listings of its divisions and size varied widely. In the early 20th century, the Chinese writer and reformer
Liang Qichao theorized that the text was actually written in the 4th century BC by Sunzi's purported descendant
Sun Bin, as a number of historical sources mention a military treatise he wrote.
Authorship[edit]
Around the 12th century, some scholars began to doubt the historical existence of Sunzi, primarily on the grounds that he is not mentioned in the historical classic
The Commentary of Zuo (Zuo zhuan 左傳), which mentions most of the notable figures from the Spring and Autumn period. The name "Sun Wu" (
孫武) does not appear in any text prior to the
Records of the Grand Historian, and has been suspected to be a made-up descriptive cognomen meaning "the fugitive warrior": the surname "Sun" is glossed as the related term "fugitive" (
xùn 遜), while "Wu" is the ancient Chinese virtue of "martial, valiant" (
wǔ 武), which corresponds to Sunzi's role as the hero's
doppelgänger in the story of
Wu Zixu. Unlike Sun Wu, Sun Bin appears to have been an actual person who was a genuine authority on military matters, and may have been the inspiration for the creation of the historical figure "Sunzi" through a form of
euhemerism.
Yinqueshan tomb discovery[edit]
In 1972, the
Yinqueshan Han slips were discovered in two
Han dynasty (206 BC – AD 220) tombs near the city of
Linyi in
Shandong Province. Among the many
bamboo slip writings contained in the tombs, which had been sealed around 134 and 118 BC, respectively were two separate texts, one attributed to "Sunzi", corresponding to the received text, and another attributed to Sun Bin, which explains and expands upon the earlier
The Art of War by Sunzi. The Sun Bin text's material overlaps with much of the "Sunzi" text, and the two may be "a single, continuously developing intellectual tradition united under the Sun name".
[10] This discovery showed that much of the historical confusion was due to the fact that there were two texts that could have been referred to as "Master Sun's Art of War", not one. The content of the earlier text is about one-third of the chapters of the modern
The Art of War, and their text matches very closely. It is now generally accepted that the earlier
The Art of War was completed sometime between 500 and 450 BC.
The 13 chapters[edit]
The Art of War is divided into 13 chapters (or piān); the collection is referred to as being one zhuàn ("whole" or alternatively "chronicle").
The Art of War chapter names in translations by Giles, Wing, Sawyer, and Chow-Hou
Chapter | Lionel Giles (1910) | R.L. Wing (1988) | Ralph D. Sawyer (1996) | Chow-Hou Wee (2003) |
I | Laying Plans | The Calculations | Initial Estimations | Detail Assessment and Planning
(Chinese: 始計) |
II | Waging War | The Challenge | Waging War | Waging War
(Chinese: 作戰) |
III | Attack by Stratagem | The Plan of Attack | Planning Offensives | Strategic Attack
(Chinese: 謀攻) |
IV | Tactical Dispositions | Positioning | Military Disposition | Disposition of the Army
(Chinese: 軍形) |
V | Use of Energy | Directing | Strategic Military Power | Forces
(Chinese: 兵勢) |
VI | Weak Points and Strong | Illusion and Reality | Vacuity and Substance | Weaknesses and Strengths
(Chinese: 虛實) |
VII | Maneuvering an Army | Engaging The Force | Military Combat | Military Maneuvers
(Chinese: 軍爭) |
VIII | Variation of Tactics | The Nine Variations | Nine Changes | Variations and Adaptability
(Chinese: 九變) |
IX | The Army on the March | Moving The Force | Maneuvering the Army | Movement and Development of Troops
(Chinese: 行軍) |
X | Classification of Terrain | Situational Positioning | Configurations of Terrain | Terrain
(Chinese: 地形) |
XI | The Nine Situations | The Nine Situations | Nine Terrains | The Nine Battlegrounds
(Chinese: 九地) |
XII | Attack by Fire | The Fiery Attack | Incendiary Attacks | Attacking with Fire
(Chinese: 火攻) |
XIII | Use of Spies | The Use of Intelligence | Employing Spies | Intelligence and Espionage
(Chinese: 用間) |
Chapter summary[edit]
- Detail Assessment and Planning (Chinese: 始計) explores the five fundamental factors (the Way, seasons, terrain, leadership, and management) and seven elements that determine the outcomes of military engagements. By thinking, assessing and comparing these points, a commander can calculate his chances of victory. Habitual deviation from these calculations will ensure failure via improper action. The text stresses that war is a very grave matter for the state and must not be commenced without due consideration.
- Waging War (Chinese: 作戰) explains how to understand the economy of warfare and how success requires winning decisive engagements quickly. This section advises that successful military campaigns require limiting the cost of competition and conflict.
- Strategic Attack (Chinese: 謀攻) defines the source of strength as unity, not size, and discusses the five factors that are needed to succeed in any war. In order of importance, these critical factors are: Attack, Strategy, Alliances, Army and Cities.
- Disposition of the Army (Chinese: 軍形) explains the importance of defending existing positions until a commander is capable of advancing from those positions in safety. It teaches commanders the importance of recognizing strategic opportunities, and teaches not to create opportunities for the enemy.
- Forces (Chinese: 兵勢) explains the use of creativity and timing in building an army's momentum.
- Weaknesses and Strengths (Chinese: 虛實) explains how an army's opportunities come from the openings in the environment caused by the relative weakness of the enemy and how to respond to changes in the fluid battlefield over a given area.
- Military Maneuvers (Chinese: 軍爭) explains the dangers of direct conflict and how to win those confrontations when they are forced upon the commander.
- Variations and Adaptability (Chinese: 九變) focuses on the need for flexibility in an army's responses. It explains how to respond to shifting circumstances successfully.
- Movement and Development of Troops (Chinese: 行軍) describes the different situations in which an army finds itself as it moves through new enemy territories, and how to respond to these situations. Much of this section focuses on evaluating the intentions of others.
- Terrain (Chinese: 地形) looks at the three general areas of resistance (distance, dangers and barriers) and the six types of ground positions that arise from them. Each of these six field positions offers certain advantages and disadvantages.
- The Nine Battlegrounds (Chinese: 九地) describes the nine common situations (or stages) in a campaign, from scattering to deadly, and the specific focus that a commander will need in order to successfully navigate them.
- Attacking with Fire (Chinese: 火攻) explains the general use of weapons and the specific use of the environment as a weapon. This section examines the five targets for attack, the five types of environmental attack and the appropriate responses to such attacks.
- Intelligence and Espionage (Chinese: 用間) focuses on the importance of developing good information sources, and specifies the five types of intelligence sources and how to best manage each of them.
Quotations[edit]
Chinese[edit]
Verses from the book occur in modern daily
Chinese idioms and phrases, such as the last verse of Chapter 3:
故曰:知彼知己,百戰不殆;不知彼而知己,一勝一負;不知彼,不知己,每戰必殆。
So it is said that if you know your enemies and know yourself, you will not be put at risk even in a hundred battles.
If you only know yourself, but not your opponent, you may win or may lose.
If you know neither yourself nor your enemy, you will always endanger yourself.
This has been more tersely interpreted and condensed into the Chinese modern proverb:
知己知彼,百戰不殆。 (Zhī jǐ zhī bǐ, bǎi zhàn bù dài.)
If you know both yourself and your enemy, you can win numerous (literally, "a hundred") battles without jeopardy.
English[edit]
Common examples can also be found in English use, such as verse 18 in Chapter 1:
兵者,詭道也。故能而示之不能,用而示之不用,近而示之遠,遠而示之近。
All warfare is based on deception. Hence, when we are able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must appear inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away; when far away, we must make him believe we are near.
This has been abbreviated to its most basic form and condensed into the English modern proverb:
All warfare is based on deception.
Cultural impact[edit]
Military and intelligence applications[edit]
Across
East Asia,
The Art of War was part of the syllabus for potential candidates of military service examinations.
During the
Sengoku period, the Japanese
daimyō named
Takeda Shingen (1521–1573) is said to have become almost invincible in all battles without relying on
guns, because he studied
The Art of War.
[11] The book even gave him the inspiration for his famous battle standard "
Fūrinkazan" (Wind, Forest, Fire and Mountain), meaning fast as the wind, silent as a forest, ferocious as fire and immovable as a mountain.
The translator
Samuel B. Griffith offers a chapter on "Sun Tzu and Mao Tse-Tung" where
The Art of War is cited as influencing Mao's
On Guerrilla Warfare,
On the Protracted War and
Strategic Problems of China's Revolutionary War, and includes Mao's quote: "We must not belittle the saying in the book of Sun Wu Tzu, the great military expert of ancient China, 'Know your enemy and know yourself and you can fight a thousand battles without disaster."
[11]
During the
Vietnam War, some
Vietcong officers extensively studied
The Art of War and reportedly could recite entire passages from memory.
General
Võ Nguyên Giáp successfully implemented tactics described in
The Art of War during the
Battle of Dien Bien Phu ending major French involvement in Indochina and leading to the accords which partitioned Vietnam into North and South. General Võ, later the main PVA military commander in the
Vietnam War, was an avid student and practitioner of Sun Tzu's ideas.
[12] America's defeat there, more than any other event, brought
Sun Tzu to the attention of leaders of American military theory.
[12][13][14]
Finnish Field Marshal
Mannerheim and general
Aksel Airo were avid readers of
Art of War. They both read it in French; Airo kept the French translation of the book on his bedside table in his quarters.
[citation needed]
The Department of the Army in the United States, through its Command and General Staff College, lists
The Art of War as one example of a book that may be kept at a military unit's library.
[15]
The Art of War is listed on the Marine Corps Professional Reading Program (formerly known as the Commandant's Reading List). It is recommended reading for all United States Military Intelligence personnel.
[16]
According to some authors, the strategy of
deception from
The Art of War was studied and widely used by the
KGB: "I will force the enemy to take our strength for weakness, and our weakness for strength, and thus will turn his strength into weakness".
[17] The book is widely cited by KGB officers in charge of
disinformation operations in
Vladimir Volkoff's novel
Le Montage.
Application outside the military[edit]
The Art of War has been applied to many fields well outside of the military. Much of the text is about how to fight wars without actually having to do battle: It gives tips on how to outsmart one's opponent so that physical battle is not necessary. As such, it has found application as a training guide for many competitive endeavors that do not involve actual combat.
The Art of War is mentioned as an influence in the earliest known Chinese collection of stories about fraud (mostly in the realm of commerce), Zhang Yingyu's
The Book of Swindles (
Du pian xin shu 杜騙新書, ca. 1617), which dates to the late Ming dynasty.
[18]
Many business books have applied the lessons taken from the book to
office politics and corporate business strategy.
[19][20][21] Many
Japanese companies make the book required reading for their key
executives.
[22] The book is also popular among Western business circles citing its utilitarian value regarding
management practices. Many entrepreneurs and corporate executives have turned to it for inspiration and advice on how to succeed in competitive business situations. The book has also been applied to the field of education.
[23]
The Art of War has been the subject of legal books
[24] and legal articles on the trial process, including negotiation tactics and trial strategy.
[25][26][27][28]
The Art of War is often quoted while developing tactics and/or strategy in
Electronic Sports. Particularly, one of the fundamental books about e-sports, "Play To Win" by
Massachusetts Institute of Technology graduate
David Sirlin, is actually just an analysis about possible applications of the ideas from
The Art of War in modern Electronic Sports.
Notable translations[edit]
The book has been translated into Assamese by Utpal Datta and published by Asom Sahitya Sabha.
The book was translated into
Manchu as
ᠴᠣᠣᡥᠠᡳ
ᠪᠠᡳᡨᠠ
ᠪᡝ
ᡤᡳᠰᡠᡵᡝᠩᡤᡝ Wylie: Tchauhai paita be gisurengge,
[31][32] Möllendorff: Coohai baita de gisurengge, Discourse on the art of War.
[33]
The first Manchu translations of Chinese works were the
Liu-t'ao 六韜, Su-shu
素書, and
San-lueh 三略 – all Chinese military texts dedicated to the arts of war due to the Manchu interests in the topic, like Sun-Tzu's work The Art of War.
[34][35] The military related texts which were translated into Manchu from Chinese were translated by Dahai.
[36] Manchu translations of Chinese texts included the Ming penal code and military texts were performed by Dahai.
[37] These translations were requested of Dahai by Nurhaci.
[38] The military text
Wu-tzu was translated into Manchu along with Sun-Tzu's work The Art of War.
[39] Chinese history, Chinese law, and Chinese military theory classical texts were translated into Manchu during the rule of Hong Taiji in Mukden with Manchus placing significance upon military and governance related Chinese texts.
[40] A Manchu translation was made of the military themed Chinese novel
Romance of the Three Kingdoms.
[41][42] Chinese literature, military theory and legal texts were translated into Manchu by Dahai and Erdeni.
[43] The translations were ordered in 1629.
[44][45] The translation of the military texts San-lüeh, Su-shu, and the Ta Ming hui-tien (the Ming law) done by Dahai was ordered by Nurhaci.
[46] While it was mainly administrative and ethical guidance which made up most of San-lüeh and Su Shu, military science was indeed found in the Liu-t'ao and Chinese military manuals were eagerly translated by the Manchus and the Manchus were also attracted to the military content in
Romance of the Three Kingdoms which is why it was translated.
[47]
Another Manchu translation was made by Aisin Gioro Qiying.
[48]
Citations
- Jump up^ Giles, Lionel The Art of War by Sun Tzu – Special Edition. Special Edition Books. 2007. p. 62.
- Jump up^ Mark Edward Lewis (2005), quoted in Mair (2007), p. 18.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Griffith, Samuel B. The Illustrated Art of War. 2005. Oxford University Press. pp. 17, 141–43.
- ^ Jump up to:a b McCready, Douglas. Learning from Sun Tzu, Military Review, May–June 2003."Archived copy". Archived from the originalon 2011-10-11. Retrieved 2009-12-19.
- Jump up^ Interview with Dr. William Duiker, Conversation with Sonshi
- Jump up^ Forbes, Andrew ; Henley, David (2012). The Illustrated Art of War: Sun Tzu. Chiang Mai: Cognoscenti Books. ASIN B00B91XX8U
- Jump up^ Army, U. S. (1985). Military History and Professional Development. U. S. Army Command and General Staff College, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas: Combat Studies Institute. 85-CSI-21 85.
- Jump up^ Marine Corps Professional Reading Program
- Jump up^ Yevgenia Albats and Catherine A. Fitzpatrick. The State Within a State: The KGB and Its Hold on Russia – Past, Present, and Future. 1994. ISBN 0-374-52738-5, chapter Who was behind perestroika?
- Jump up^ https://cup.columbia.edu/search-results?keyword=book+of+swindles
- Jump up^ Michaelson, Gerald. "Sun Tzu: The Art of War for Managers; 50 Strategic Rules." Avon, MA: Adams Media, 2001
- Jump up^ McNeilly, Mark. "Sun Tzu and the Art of Business : Six Strategic Principles for Managers. New York:Oxford University Press, 1996.
- Jump up^ Krause, Donald G. "The Art of War for Executives: Ancient Knowledge for Today's Business Professional." New York: Berkley Publishing Group, 1995.
- Jump up^ Kammerer, Peter. "The Art of Negotiation." South China Morning Post (April 21, 2006) p. 15
- Jump up^ Jeffrey, D (2010). "A Teacher Diary Study to Apply Ancient Art of War Strategies to Professional Development". The International Journal of Learning. 7 (3): 21–36.
- Jump up^ Barnhizer, David. The Warrior Lawyer: Powerful Strategies for Winning Legal Battles Irvington-on-Hudson, NY: Bridge Street Books, 1997.
- Jump up^ Balch, Christopher D., "The Art of War and the Art of Trial Advocacy: Is There Common Ground?" (1991), 42 Mercer L. Rev. 861–73
- Jump up^ Beirne, Martin D. and Scott D. Marrs, The Art of War and Public Relations: Strategies for Successful Litigation [1]
- Jump up^ Pribetic, Antonin I., "The Trial Warrior: Applying Sun Tzu's The Art of War to Trial Advocacy" April 21, 2007, [2]
- Jump up^ Solomon, Samuel H., "The Art of War: Pursuing Electronic Evidence as Your Corporate Opportunity" [3]
- Jump up^ "Put crafty Belichick's patriot games down to the fine art of war". The Sydney Morning Herald. 2005-02-04.
- Jump up^ Winter, Henry (June 29, 2006). "Mind games reach new high as Scolari studies art of war". Irish Independent.
- Jump up^ Shou-p'ing Wu Ko (1855). Translation (by A. Wylie) of the Ts'ing wan k'e mung, a Chinese grammar of the Manchu Tartar language (by Woo Kĭh Show-ping, revised and ed. by Ching Ming-yuen Pei-ho) with intr. notes on Manchu literature. p. 39.
- Jump up^ http://library.umac.mo/ebooks/b31043252.pdf
- Jump up^ Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland. North China Branch, Shanghai (1890). Journal of the North China Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society. Kelly & Walsh. pp. 40–.
- Jump up^ Early China. Society for the Study of Early China. 1975. p. 53.
- Jump up^ Durrant, Stephen (1977). “Manchu Translations of Chou Dynasty Texts”. Early China 3. [Cambridge University Press, Society for the Study of Early China]: 52–54. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23351361.
- Jump up^ Sin-wai Chan (2009). A Chronology of Translation in China and the West: From the Legendary Period to 2004. Chinese University Press. pp. 60–61. ISBN 978-962-996-355-2.
- Jump up^ Peter C Perdue (30 June 2009). China Marches West: The Qing Conquest of Central Eurasia. Harvard University Press. pp. 122–. ISBN 978-0-674-04202-5.
- Jump up^ Frederic Wakeman Jr. (1985). The Great Enterprise: The Manchu Reconstruction of Imperial Order in Seventeenth-century China. University of California Press. pp. 44–. ISBN 978-0-520-04804-1.
- Jump up^ Early China. Society for the Study of Early China. 1977. p. 53.
- Jump up^ Claudine Salmon (13 November 2013). Literary Migrations: Traditional Chinese Fiction in Asia (17th-20th Centuries). Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. pp. 94–. ISBN 978-981-4414-32-6.
- Jump up^ Cultural Hybridity in Manchu Bannermen Tales (zidishu). ProQuest. 2007. pp. 25–. ISBN 978-0-549-44084-0.
- Jump up^ West, Andrew. "The Textual History of Sanguo Yanyi: The Manchu Translation". Retrieved 11 October 2016.
- Jump up^ Arthur W. Hummel (1991). Eminent Chinese of the Ch'ing period: 1644–1912. SMC publ. p. vi. ISBN 978-957-638-066-2.
- Jump up^ Shou-p'ing Wu Ko (1855). Translation (by A. Wylie) of the Ts'ing wan k'e mung, a Chinese grammar of the Manchu Tartar language (by Woo Kĭh Show-ping, revised and ed. by Ching Ming-yuen Pei-ho) with intr. notes on Manchu literature. pp. xxxvi–.
- Jump up^ Translation of the Ts'ing wan k'e mung, a Chinese Grammar of the Manchu Tartar Language; with introductory notes on Manchu Literature: (translated by A. Wylie.). Mission Press. 1855. pp. xxxvi–.
- Jump up^ http://www.dartmouth.edu/~qing/WEB/DAHAI.html
- Jump up^ Durrant, Stephen. 1979. “Sino-manchu Translations at the Mukden Court”. Journal of the American Oriental Society 99 (4). American Oriental Society: 653–61. doi:10.2307/601450. https://www.jstor.org/stable/601450?seq=2 pp. 654–56.
- Jump up^ Soldierly Methods: Vade Mecum for an Iconoclastic Translation of Sun Zi bingfa (Art of War). p. 82
SEE ALSO
Concepts
Books
Sources
- Gawlikowski, Krzysztof; Loewe, Michael (1993). "Sun tzu ping fa 孫子兵法". In Loewe, Michael. Early Chinese Texts: A Bibliographical Guide. Berkeley: Society for the Study of Early China; Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California, Berkeley. pp. 446–55. ISBN 1-55729-043-1.
- Graff, David A. (2002). Medieval Chinese Warfare, 300-900. Warfare and History. London: Routledge. ISBN 0415239559.
- Griffith, Samuel (2005). Sun Tzu: The Illustrated Art of War. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 019518999X.
- Lewis, Mark Edward (1999). "Warring States Political History". In Loewe, Michael; Shaughnessy, Edward. The Cambridge History of Ancient China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 587–650. ISBN 0-521-47030-7.
- Mair, Victor H. (2007). The Art of War: Sun Zi's Military Methods. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-13382-1.
- Smith, Kidder (1999). "The Military Texts: The Sunzi". In de Bary, Wm. Theodore. Sources of Chinese Tradition: From Earliest Times to 1600, Volume 1 (2nd ed.). New York: Columbia University Press. pp. 213–24. ISBN 978-0-231-10938-3.
- Вєдєнєєв, Д. В.; Гавриленко, О. А.; Кубіцький, С. О. (2017). Остроухова, В. В., ed. Еволюція воєнного мистецтва: у 2 ч.
External links
| Wikisource has original text related to this article:
|
| Wikimedia Commons has media related to Sun Tzu. |
show
Pre-1911 Chinese Military
|