Monday, October 12, 2020

PART 1 TUMULTOUS GEO POLTICS OF KASHMIR : Nights Without End: Four Days with the Hizbul Mujahideen

 SOURCE:

  https://www.sundayguardianlive.com/news/nights-without-end-four-days-hizbul-mujahideen





  PART  ONE     



     REFERENCES


PART  ONE: Nights Without End: Four Days with the Hizbul Mujahideen

https://bcvasundhra.blogspot.com/2020/10/tumultous-geo-poltics-of-kashmir-nights.html


PART  TWO:  The Heaven Born: The Men Who Ruled Kashmir

https://bcvasundhra.blogspot.com/2020/10/part-2-tumultous-geo-poltics-of-kashmir.html


PART  THREE  : Puppeteers Without Strings: Pied Pipers of Hate 

https://bcvasundhra.blogspot.com/2020/10/part-3-tumultous-geo-poltics-of-kashmir.html


PART  FOUR Dining at the High Table: The Early Military History of Kashmir

https://bcvasundhra.blogspot.com/2020/10/part-4-tumultous-geo-poltics-of-kashmir.html


PART FIVE :   HISTORY OF DOGRA EMPIRE:  Mastermind The Emergence  of Gulab Singh

https://bcvasundhra.blogspot.com/2020/10/part-5-tumultous-geo-poltics-of-kashmir.html?zx=b395f07a5f64b481

PART SIX Stones of Silence: Ladakh and Beyond

https://bcvasundhra.blogspot.com/2020/10/saturday-october-17-2020-part-6_19.html


PART SEVEN :   Kingdom of Mountains : Dogras and the East India Company

https://bcvasundhra.blogspot.com/2020/10/part-7-tumultous-geo-poltics-of-kashmir.html


PART EIGHT :  Cat and Mouse Games  :British Empire and the J&K Maharajas

https://bcvasundhra.blogspot.com/2020/10/part-8-tumultous-geo-poltics-of-kashmir.html

                              


           Nights Without End


PREVIEW

#Kashmir #KashmirTheStory #TimesNow


Kashmir The Story:


 Full Documentary On The History & Timelines Of Kashmir Valley


            [ https://youtu.be/6SuNPI6Y6K8 ]

Aug 5, 2019


A TIMES NOW Exclusive, this documentary series gives an insight into the conflict-ridden region, showcasing facts as they are. The purely observational piece of storytelling is an honest attempt to showcase life in the Kashmir valley. Watch Kashmir The Story here. #Kashmir #KashmirTheStory #TimesNow


                      -----------------------------------------------------------------------------



   Nights Without End: Four Days with

          the Hizbul Mujahideen 

                    BY

          SHIV KUNAL VERMA



REPRESENTATIONAL PHOTO:
 People look at the damaged house where Hizbul Mujahideen Commander-in-Chief, Riyaz Naikoo was killed in an encounter with Army personnel at Beighpora in Pulwama district of south Kashmir in May. ANI



  • August 22, 2020 

The Sunday Guardian brings to its readers an unconventional account of Kashmir by filmmaker and author Shiv Kunal Verma. The author of the highly acclaimed, 1962: The War That Wasn’t and The Long Road to Siachen: The Question Why takes us into the back alleys of history and based on established historical facts and his own personal experiences, weaves together not just a picture of what has been happening in the disturbed state, now a union territory, but also how things can and should pan out. Having lived in Srinagar in the early part of his career where he reconnoitred and opened old routes between the Valley and Zanskar/Ladakh for Tiger Tops Mountain Travel, he also spent a lot of time in areas that are in the news today as his father was then commanding a brigade in Eastern Ladakh. Subsequently, working with the armed forces and otherwise, he has extensively filmed in the remotest corners of the region. This series of articles, starting today, brings to the fore the ground reality and historical facts that need to be underscored especially by the younger generation of Indians, both inside and outside the region.



‘What can we do sir? There is truth in what you say, but they are the ones holding the guns,’ was the refrain from ordinary Kashmiris about the terrorists.

 

New Delhi:

At the Lal Bahadur Shastri National Academy for Administration in Mussoorie, my film Kashmir: Baramula to Kargil was being screened on the very day the Government of India decided to nullify Article 370 and reconstitute the state of Jammu and Kashmir into two union territories. Twenty years after the film had been made, I couldn’t help but think how little things had changed and how relevant it was even then. After the film was over I was asked my opinion on the latest developments. Good, bad, only time would tell, I answered, but one thing was for sure—the status quo had been broken where day in and day out, year after year, it had been the same story. In a scenario where positions had hardened over the years, each generation was growing up influenced by the narrative it was fed. A lot of it was perhaps coloured by individual experiences, but some core issues that were factual and not disputable would never change. The film brought back a tsunami of memories, for that had been the reality then, and it was perhaps even now much the same at the grassroots.


It was three in the morning on a pitch black January night in 1995, the temperature was further plummeting and the sides of the road had over ten feet of snow. Wearing a straw-coloured phiran over my jacket I had a Canon video camera with four spare batteries, a small tripod, half a dozen tapes and a slightly damaged ten-year old identity card that said I was from the Associated Press. Making me even more uncomfortable was a 9 mm Beretta tucked away in the waistband of my trousers, with two fully loaded magazines. The pistol was a last minute addition to my gear, handed to me by an Army colonel after I had got out of his Army jonga at Milestone 7. “It’s a captured weapon,” he had said, “throw it away if you don’t need it.” Before I could protest, he had driven away. He had spent the daylight hours trying to convince me not to accept the Hizbul Mujahideen’s offer to film with them, but the meeting had been arranged and though I was terrified at one level, I had decided to go ahead with the rendezvous. “You’re crazy,” had been his mantra. At that moment I guess I agreed with him.

It was so cold there was no ambient sound, no crickets, no cicadas, not even a whisper. An hour seemed to be a lifetime and then out of nowhere someone had grabbed both my arms and a sack was put over my head. A voice told me to start walking, and with two men holding me I was frog marched roughly along. First I tried to count…twenty-five steps to the right…fifteen to the left, but it was useless, so I gave up within the first minute itself. We must have been walking like that for half an hour, though I suspected we were still pretty close to where I had originally been picked up. We went up a stairway, and finally the sack was yanked off my head and my arms freed.

The room was carpeted with mattresses and it had about a dozen men, all wearing the trademark phirans looking at me. Each man had an AK-47, those who had come in with me were holding theirs, while those who were sitting there from before had their weapons by their side. A mild-mannered man with a bald head, whose voice I recognised as the one that told me to start walking, introduced himself as the “Peer” and for the next four days he was rarely more than two feet away from me.

A young girl, her head covered in a floral hijab, handed me a cup of tea that I gratefully accepted. Then the “Peer” started to introduce the others, starting with one man who had a pock-marked face and obviously was their kingpin. Meet Lieutenant General so-and-so… [I didn’t catch his name, but I think he said Saibuddin or something like that…

yeh yeha ke army commander hain… inhone army ka teen head shot kiya hai… aur baiaasi aurto ka balatkar kiya hai (he is the local army commander and he has shot in the head three army personnel and raped eighty-two women)]. 

I couldn’t believe my ears! I stopped the “Peer” and asked, “Can I film the introduction?” Amazingly, he said yes, so I  put the camera on the tripod and started rolling… the introduction was repeated while   pock-marked grinned hideously.


 I had to conserve battery so I was filming selectively. I was asked to sit and make myself comfortable and drink my tea. Then the “Peer” said in his soft voice,

Kunal saab, aap woh pistaul ko side mein rakh do. Chub rahi hogi (why don’t you put the pistol away? It must be poking you).” 

All the men in the room, obviously in on the joke, burst out laughing. It would transpire later that they had been observing me the whole time with a night vision device. They were better equipped than most Infantry units, even their communication systems were superior.

In the morning we went into a mosque. All the menfolk from the village were sitting inside. Armed with a mike, the “Peer” started his monologue…“Hindustan ki hakumat (Government of India)” was getting it in the neck in lavish doses, so was the BSF and the Army, who according to the “Peer” believed in the mantra, if it moves, rape it! The red recording light was blinking, but this propaganda stuff was getting on my nerves. I got two or three quick shots of old men, the stubble on their chins white, listening and nodding in rapt attention. I stopped filming and did something very stupid—I interrupted the “Peer” and asked him for the mike. I think he was a bit taken aback, for this was not in the script, but he gave me the microphone. I probably didn’t need it, but it gave me the authority to speak. “How many of you believe this nonsense?” I asked.



No one said anything, they were all watching me. At one level I was scared and my voice sounded as if my throat needed lubrication, but then I started to tell them what I knew was the background to Pakistan’s invasion, the loot and the mass murders in Baramula, the abduction of women by the tribal lashkars, the Deed of Accession, the fighting at Shalateng, Patan, Baramula and Uri. Even the guys with the guns standing at the windows were listening. But no one was reacting, no nods of the head…they were just fixatedly looking at me.


How and when this finished, I don’t remember, but as I was leaving the mosque walking a step behind the “Peer”, an old man with cataract in his one eye stopped me by tugging at my phiran. “Hum kya karen janaab,” he said loudly and clearly, he then let his gaze travel to the armed men around me, “aap ki baat sach hai, lehkin inke haath mein AK hain (What can we do sir? There is truth in what you say, but they are the ones holding the guns).” The entire congregation behind the old man nodded their heads in agreement. The “Peer” said nothing, just turned and walked away and I followed him.

At this point of time we were six years into the reign of terror, part of Op TOPAC, unleashed by General Zia-ul-Haq, his master plan based on the principle that to wrest control of Kashmir, Pakistan must make India bleed by a thousand cuts. As time passed, I got to know the band of chaps around me reasonably well. They all thought I was a part of the Western media and they obviously had their instructions to ensure I wasn’t harmed. I wasn’t then aware of the back room deal that had got me into their midst, but I got to know the story later. CO 10 Bihar, Colonel Harsh Udai Singh Gaur, had been killed at Bazipura on 29 November in a fire-fight. He was a brave soldier who led from the front, and as luck would have it, he was the first casualty the battalion suffered. A la Galwan, the Biharis went berserk over the next few days, tracking down and killing some of the hard core militants. The noose tightening around him, a senior commander started negotiating his own surrender with the Intelligence guys. But before he surrendered, someone suggested maybe he could let me cross over and film the HM in action. I was somewhere near Kupwara when the Chief of Staff 15 Corps called and said, “Are you willing to go across? We can arrange it!”

During those four days, I kept probing, trying to understand why young men in their early twenties could be enticed to live a life that would sooner or later meet a violent end. Religion? Not particularly, though on the face of it all the superficial trappings were visible. Ideology? Apart from the local politics of the immediate area they were in, they seemed to have little idea or interest in the larger picture. Economics? Perhaps in the case of a few. The majority seemed to be there simply because it was perhaps the only way to protect their own families. And of course the language of the gun, which gave them unbridled power. It seemed incredible that this motley crowd and others like them could hold a state to ransom!

After their ham handed attempt to blame the Army for the rapes and the loot, the HM guys didn’t even bother with keeping up that pretence. 

The next 72 hours were crazy…gun fights, killings, dragging screaming women out of their homes, holding pistols and carbines against their children’s temples to force them to go with them, the wailing, the breast beating, the misery, the terror…and the constant lament, “kya karen janaab, unke haath mein AK hai 

became a blur in my mind. We were also hiding from Army patrols, sometimes in lofts, sometimes in dark chambers dug below the floor boards. This was rural Kashmir and the horror was endless. Unable to charge my batteries, I kept shooting little snippets.


TAKING ON THE NARRATIVE OF HATE

How exactly I got back to the Army’s side I don’t remember. I was told to discard my phiran and start walking and was quickly intercepted and whisked away in a vehicle. That night I was with 13 Kumaon, my feet in hot water, my hands shaking with what I had seen. Everything was a blur after that…the moment I took off from Srinagar for Delhi, it felt as if I had crawled out of my shell as a new me. It was all so unreal…a different world which was hard to comprehend…and yet, there was the film. Neatly labelled tapes…thirty-four days of hard shooting.

The Army chief, General Shankar Roy Chaudhuri saw the tapes, so did the Prime Minister, Narasimha Rao. Lt Gen Padmanabhan was the DGMI (later chief) and we screened the four tapes shot with the HM, unedited, to a select group of ambassadors and military attaches and editors. The Times of India, which was writing sanctimonious editorials about the Army raping people, suddenly changed its tune. And yet, we sat with that footage, not knowing exactly how to use it.

Then Kargil happened, four years later. I shot that too, again often wondering “what the hell am I doing here?” I had no official position, but since I had been filming with the Army and the IAF extensively (and the Navy, I might add) during peacetime, it seemed the logical thing to do. As things panned out, I was cleared to fly in helicopters with the rider that a senior officer must accompany me. As a result, I spent a lot of time with Major General V.S. Budhwar, GOC 3 Infantry Division, and he in turn had to buzz around the countryside with the doors removed from the Army Aviation Cheetahs so that I could film unhindered. A loose unofficial system evolved where various channels were given footage of the fighting, the only condition put to them being don’t use terms like “Indian Occupied Kashmir”, etc. Even that seemed like a big achievement at the time.

Eventually, we decided that the story of Kargil made little sense without telling the post-Independent history of Kashmir. This allowed us to use all the footage that I had shot first with the IAF in 1992 and then painstakingly in December-January 1994-95. The film began with some of the scenes that we had shot with the HM during those tumultuous days when explosions in downtown Srinagar were so common place that they hardly turned heads anymore. The final film, screened after the war for Bill Clinton and his entourage, had served its purpose then. 

Today, in a far more complex and tech-savvy world, the propagated narrative continues to distort issues and the threat has increased exponentially, with China also openly entering the fray in Kashmir. It is, therefore, time for us to revisit certain key issues in the next few weeks to understand what exactly happened in Jammu and Kashmir.


                                                   ---------------------------------------


Shiv Kunal Verma is the author of “1962: The War That Wasn’t” and “The Long Road to Siachen: The Question Why”.









Friday, October 9, 2020

China-Pakistan Nexus Over Gilgit-Baltistan: A Cause For Worry

SOURCE:

https://www.eurasiareview.com/09102020-china-pakistan-nexus-over-gilgit-baltistan-a-cause-for-worry-analysis/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+eurasiareview%2FVsnE+%28Eurasia+Review%29


https://www.firstpost.com/india/by-placing-faith-in-diplomacy-not-armed-forces-india-has-narrowed-its-options-to-handle-china-brahma-chellaney-8843441.html



Road in Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan. Photo Credit: Jim Qara, Wikimedia Commons.




Analysis


China-Pakistan Nexus Over Gilgit-Baltistan :A Cause For Worry 

 
                                  By

                         Ashok Tiku*





The open nexus between China and Pakistan over the Gilgit-Baltistan issue is evident with the announcement in Pakistan on elevating the status of Gilgit-Baltistan (GB) region, historically an integral part of Jammu and Kashmir, to a fifth province of Pakistan.

The two neighbors are coordinating measures to ensure GB becomes the fifth province at the earliest and jointly prevent India from taking any military action on this illegal annexation with China providing the moral, political, tactical and military support. The planned large scale military exercises by PLA in Tibet; amassing of troops and heavy military hardware has clear cut objectives and may be viewed as part of this overall Plan. 


The objectives being:

  • Pressure and prevent India from undertaking any military action against Pakistan in the event of the region being annexed by Pakistan as its fifth province.  

  • In case of any war-like posturing by India, PLA to keep Indian Army engaged on LAC.

  •  Help China legitimize its illegal road construction activities, Construction of Moqpondas Special economic zone in the CPEC corridor that passes through the region and legitimize presence of PLA forces to maintain security in the region. 

  • Secure China’s $60 billion investments and thereafter push for leasing of this debt burdened region to China to exploit the natural resources in the region.

  • Allow China to secure a direct link to POK via the Karakuram Pass to save about 1500 kms of the supply route currently operating via the Khunzraba Pass bordering Xinjiang.

  • Beijing’s diplomatic and political gestures, overtones to resolve the LAC intrusions issue only aimed at  gaining time and not to impact PLA’s action on the ground –total disconnect between PLA’s actions and political-diplomatic engagements.

  These objectives are to be achieved in two stages: 

Stage one: Pakistan speeds up the parliamentary process to get the relevant bills passed in its parliament to include the GB region as a fifth province of Pakistan, and thereby legitimize China’s construction activities and investments in the region.

Stage two:  China to secure a direct access road to the region via the Karakuram Pass to save about 1500 Kms detour link via the Khunzraba   Pass bordering the  Xinjiang region.  The Pakistan army will coordinate with PLA and increase pressure on LOC to ward off any aggression by India.

To complete the first stage quickly, the Pakistan Army is using its influence and muscle in ensuring the speedy completion of parliamentary process. Pakistan media reports that the Pakistan Army chief along with the ISI chief met on September 16 with 15 key opposition leaders to discuss the issue of  “not dragging the Pak Army into political issues.”


But the real purpose of the meeting, as disclosed by Pakistan Railway Minister Sheikh Rashid, was to ‘expedite and seek support of opposition leaders to grant’ “provisional provincial status to Gilgit-Baltistan.”  The opposition parties Alliance, while confirming the meeting, have separately stated that the issue would be taken up  only after the scheduled November 15 elections in Gilgit-Baltistan to elect the 24 member legislative Assembly.  

Gilgit Baltistan leaders also seem to be divided over Pakistan’s fifth province plan. Local leaders are divided over the issue whether to ask for more autonomy or seek the merger of the entire region that includes POK as a full-fledged province of Pakistan. Facing increased pressure from China, the Pakistan army is attempting to expedite the move by using pressure tactics to brow beat the opposition in supporting the Army’s plan at the earliest.

In this vein, the Army unsuccessfully tried to create a rift within PML-N ranks and opposition alliance. PML-N leader Maryam Nawaz  Sharif has said that the issue such as GB should be decided in Parliament and not at the military headquarters and had accused her uncle of hobnobbing with  the military leadership – thus forcing Mr Nawaz Sharif to issue a warning  banning his party members from holding any private meetings with military leadership.

The Government has arrested some opposition leaders particularly the leadership of PML-N, charging them with corruption charges etc. To help Pakistan seek time for passing this resolution in Parliament and prevent any pre-emptive attack from India in the GB region, China has succeeded in buying time by keeping India engaged in talks.


To accomplish the second stage of this plan, while China is keeping India engaged in talks, it has started making large encroachments in the critical Depsang Y-Junction that controls the access to several areas of utmost importance to Indian defences.

The strategically located Depsang plains area about 18 kms inside what India perceives to be its territory, and has been occupied by the Chinese army blocking the Indian army patrolling beyond their traditional patrolling  points 10,11,11A,12,13, which fall short of India’s LAC claim and are well within the Indian territory.

A core concern for China is also that the Depsang-Dalat Beg Olde (DBO) sector is in close proximity of the G-219 highway connecting Tibet with Xinjiang. For India the DBO and Karakoram Pass in the North are of great strategic significance and it would undermine the Indian position if it allows PLA to continue to occupy it.

To keep Indian forces under check and engaged, PLA has resorted to aggression in the Pangong Tso–Chushul and adjoining areas along the frontier with Ladakh only as a tactical bargaining posture. After accomplishing the objective of  merging Gilgit-Baltistan region legally with Pakistan, China would be forth coming for half way adjustments at the transgressed area. 

India has to assume that it will be on the receiving end of China-Pakistan joint aggression — overtly and covertly — and has to be prepared for any eventuality. Beijing’s diplomatic and political gestures, overtones to resolve the issue are not matched by the PLA’s action on the ground. There is a total disconnect between the PLA’s actions and political-diplomatic engagements.

This writer fully endorses the views expressed by Geostrategist Mr. Brahma Chellany, that the “Indian governments have been putting more faith in diplomacy than the armed forces in achieving security objectives.                                                            [  CLICK/GOOGLE  https://www.firstpost.com/india/by-placing-faith-in-diplomacy-not-armed-forces-india-has-narrowed-its-options-to-handle-china-brahma-chellaney-8843441.html  ]  The diplomatic blunders of 1948 (Kashmir), 1954 (Panchsheel), 1960 (Tibet), 1966 (Tashkent), 1972 (Simla) have imposed tremendous enduring costs  and yet India is not learning from past mistakes. Now, the Indian Government admits that China has trashed all those agreements with its aggression, yet is playing into China’s hands by clinging to past accords and is even willing to enter into a “new confidence building measures agreement.”

China has mastered and fully understands the weakness of Indian politicians to enter into new agreements for glorification. Otherwise where was the need to sign so many pacts on the same issue repeatedly? Diplomacy is unlikely to deliver the status quo that India is seeking. The latest round of Commander’s Level Talks (6th) has achieved nothing and in fact the PLA has used the cover of diplomatic and military talks to crank up its military logistics and troop strength. It is unlikely that anything tangible would be achieved before making Gilgit-Balistan as part of Pakistan. Till then Beijing will be buying time to prevent any Indian attack in the region and the possibility of anything tangible in forthcoming bilateral talks is also bleak. 

China’s recent reference to the once rejected 1959 LAC shows its reluctance to disengage, hardening of position and any resolution of the dispute even more difficult. The Indian government has made its stand very clear. The Indian Defence Minister has categorically and in an unambiguous manner stated, “India will always patrol in its traditional areas and will not allow unilateral change in LAC.” … “India will respond to any aggression on LAC and will never let China have what they want” …. “India will match China’s build up at LAC. “This has been conveyed to Chinese leadership both at military and political levels”.

 India’s consistent unambiguous stand should be ‘No New Agreements,  Maintain April Statuesque ante with China withdrawing first, Speed up efforts to resolve the border issue peacefully and no interference in the Gilgit-Balitstan region, historically an integral part of the Jammu and Kashmir State of India. 

It appears that the outcome of the dialogue with China is directly dependent on how soon Pakistan is able to merge Gilgit-Baltistan into a province. China could also use the US’ preoccupation with elections in November to carry out the second stage of this plan with a surprise, quick, localized strike against India without seeking to start a war to regain the strategic peaks overlooking its defense lines and secure the new shorter link road access to GB region via the Karakuram Pass. 

India has to maintain utmost vigilance particularly during the dry month period of October/November against this Pakistan-China Nexus. China’s recent reference to 1959 LAC as well as its upfront rejection of the map of Ladakh is a challenge that needs to be countered both politically and militarily.


*Prof Ashok Tiku, Senior China Analyst (45 years of experience). A version of this article was published in The Asian Community News 










Tuesday, October 6, 2020

 SOURCE:

https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2020/10/pakistans-new-chinese-aip-submarines-image-shows-karachi-site/

Sunday, October 4, 2020

BOMBS & EXPLOSIVES : Explained: How Indian Army’s new Multi-Mode Hand Grenades are different (R)

 SOURCE:

https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/indian-army-multi-mode-hand-grenades-features-explained-6664662/?utm_source=newzmate&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=explained&utm_content=6386461&tqid=jKOjNiAgGxYBTy03LRt1RjFD2QZG1X4a1OU3aIpuzg


Explained: How Indian Army’s new Multi-Mode Hand Grenades are different


                                        By

                          Sushant Kulkarni 



A look at the features of the Multi-Mode Hand Grenades (MMHG), and why they are considered an improvement over those currently in use by the Indian Army.




The Acquisition Wing of the MoD has signed a contract with Economic Explosive Ltd for the supply of 10 lakh MMHG to the Indian Army at an approximate cost of Rs 409 crore.


The Ministry of Defence on Thursday announced it had signed a contract with a Nagpur-based private entity for supply of 10 lakh of units indigenously designed and developed Multi-Mode Hand Grenades (MMHG) to the Indian Army at a cost of over Rs 400 crore. These grenades will be replacing the World War-II vintage ‘Mills Bomb’ type 36M hand grenades now used by the Army.

A look at the features of the MMGH, and why they are considered an improvement over those currently in use.

The No 36 Grenades Currently in use

In the early 20th century, militaries across the world started using fragmentation grenades, whose casings are structured for it to break into small fragments which can cause further harm following the explosion. The peculiar pineapple-like look was given because the outside segments and grooves aid the fragmentation of the casing. In the further improved designs, the grooves and segments were put from the inside and pineapple like outer structure was also retained for better grip.

or several years now, the Indian Army has been using the World War vintage 36M hand grenade. The number refers to a variant of the ‘Mills Bomb’ which are British origin grenades and these grenades also have the pineapple shape. These grenades can be fired from the rifle too. The 36M have been manufactured by the facilities of the Ordnance Factory Board (OFB) for the Armed forces.

The Multi-Mode Hand Grenade


“Grenades of natural fragmentation type have been in use by the infantry world over for a long time. Indian Army still uses the 36M, a grenade which also has severe reliability problems and uneven fragmenting pattern making it unsafe even to the thrower. The multi-mode grenade has been developed to overcome these defects. It uses preformed cylindrical mild steel pre-fragments to achieve uniform distribution,” says the official page of the DRDO’s facility Terminal Ballistic Research Laboratory (TBRL) which has developed the MMHG.

The MMHG can be used in two different structures resulting in two different modes — defensive and offensive. The grenades being used by the forces in India till now have been mainly the defensive mode grenades, which means that they are to be hurled when the thrower is in a shelter or has a cover and the target is in an open area and can be harmed by fragmentation.

On the other hand, the offensive grenades do not fragment, and the adversary is harmed by the blast or is stunned while the thrower is safe.



For the MMHG’s defensive mode, the grenade has a fragamenting sleeve and a lethal radius of 10 metres. In the offensive mode, the grenade is without a sleeve and mainly used for blast and stun effect. In the offensive, it has a lethal radius of 5 meters from point of burst.


The Supply of MMHG

The Acquisition Wing of the MoD on Thursday signed a contract with Economic Explosive Ltd — EEL is a subsidiary of Nagpur-headquartered Solar Group — for the supply of 10 lakh MMHG to the Indian Army at an approximate cost of Rs 409 crore. For conducting field tests of the grenade, the DRDO had transferred the technology to the company four years ago. The grenade has been tested in various types of conditions and is said to have achieved 99 per cent safety and reliability.

The MoD press statement in this regard said, “This is a flagship project showcasing public-private partnership under the aegis of Government of India (DRDO and MoD) enabling ‘AtmaNirbharta’ in cutting edge ammunition technologies and accomplishes 100 per cent indigenous content.”

Officials said the development of the grenade had begun around 15 years ago and along with the DRDO facility, establishments of Army and OFB have also played a role in the development.


Also in Explained |