Vasundhra

Thursday, July 8, 2021

CHINA: Taiping Rebellion BY the younger brother of Jesus Christ (Dec1850 – Aug1864)

 SOURCE: (a)  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiping_Rebellion


INDEX 

(a) First Opium war :       https://bcvasundhra.blogspot.com/2021/07/china-first-opium-war-1839-42.html

(b) Second Opium War :  https://bcvasundhra.blogspot.com/2021/07/china-second-opium-war-1856-to-1860.html

 (c) Taiping Rebellion :  https://bcvasundhra.blogspot.com/2021/07/china-taiping-rebellion-by-younger.html

 (d) Boxer Rebellion :       https://bcvasundhra.blogspot.com/2021/07/china-boxer-rebellion.html



CHINA

     Taiping Rebellion BY the Younger Brother 

                                     of 

                             Jesus Christ

                    (Dec 1850 –Aug 1864)




  (Gen)  WAR LORDS Taiping Rebellion SERIALISED :......HERE

  OR Google  URL TO OPEN  :                                                               https://youtu.be/SGhfUq66ADQ?list=PLE-54DNDp0mB5OYNISlxa6_uSAQah8FME

( A ) Taiping Rebellion Documentry Part 1.................   HERE

                                                                                                                                                                            OR Google  URL TO OPEN  :  https://youtu.be/BNu62zecKyU


( B )  Taiping Rebellion Documentry Part 2..................HERE

OR Google  URL TO OPEN :  https://youtu.be/q7mjVKgxFZ0


( C ) Taiping Rebellion Documentry  ...................HERE

OR Google  URL TO OPEN : https://youtu.be/nSRxwx72pc0


                                                               


Taiping Rebellion
Part of the century of humiliation
Regaining the Provincial City Anqing2.jpg
An 1884 painting of the Battle of Anqing (1861)
DateDecember 1850 – August 1864
Location
China
Result

Qing victory

  • Qing dynasty severely weakened
  • Rise of provincial armies and regionalism
  • Han officials more widely employed in high positions
Belligerents
  • Flag of the Qing Dynasty (1862-1889).svg Qing Empire

Later stages:

  •  France
  •  United Kingdom
  •  Taiping Heavenly Kingdom

Co-belligerents:

  • Nian rebels
  • Red Turban rebels
  • Small Swords Society
Commanders and leaders
  • Imperial standard of the Qing Emperor.svg Xianfeng Emperor
  • Imperial standard of the Qing Emperor.svg Empress Dowager Cixi
  • Flag of the Qing Dynasty (1862-1889).svg Zeng Guofan
  • Flag of the Qing Dynasty (1862-1889).svg Sengge Rinchen
  • Flag of the Qing Dynasty (1862-1889).svg Guanwen
  • Flag of the Qing Dynasty (1862-1889).svg Li Hongzhang
  • Flag of the Qing Dynasty (1862-1889).svg Luo Bingzhang
  • Flag of the Qing Dynasty (1862-1889).svg Jirhangga †
  • Flag of the Qing Dynasty (1862-1889).svg Zuo Zongtang
  • Flag of the Qing Dynasty (1862-1889).svg Zhang Guoliang †
  • Flag of the Qing Dynasty (1862-1889).svg He Chun †
  • Flag of the Qing Dynasty (1862-1889).svg Xiang Rong †
  • Flag of the Qing Dynasty (1862-1889).svg Frederick Townsend Ward †
  • Second French Empire Auguste Protet †
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland Charles George Gordon
  •  Hong Xiuquan
  •  Hong Tianguifu Executed
  •  Hong Xuanjiao
  •  Yang Xiuqing †
  •  Feng Yunshan †
  •  Xiao Chaogui †
  •  Wei Changhui †
  •  Hong Rengan Executed
  •  Shi Dakai Executed
  •  Li Xiucheng Executed
  •  Chen Yucheng Executed
  •  Li Shixian †
  •  Qin Rigang Executed

Co-Commanders:

  • Zhang Lexing † (Nian Rebels)
  • Su Sanniang (Nian rebels)
  • Qiu Ersao † (Red Turban rebels)
Strength
3,400,000+[1]2,000,000[2]
10,000,000 (all combatants)[3]
Casualties and losses

Total dead:

30-50 million[4]
hide
  • v
  • t
  • e
Taiping Rebellion
  • Jintian
  • Changsha
  • Wuchang
  • 1st Nanjing
  • Western Expedition
  • Northern Expedition
  • Eastern Expedition
  • 1st Jiangnan
  • Tianjing incident
  • Sanhe
  • 2nd Jiangnan
  • Ningbo
  • Anqing
  • Shanghai
  • Guanzhong
  • Cixi
  • Changzhou
  • 3rd Nanking
  • Hubei
  • Fujian
Taiping Rebellion
Traditional Chinese太平天國運動
Simplified Chinese太平天国运动
Literal meaning"Taiping [Great Peace] Heavenly Kingdom Movement"
hideTranscriptions
Standard Mandarin
Hanyu PinyinTàipíng tiānguó yùndòng
Bopomofoㄊㄞˋ ㄆㄧㄥˊ ㄊㄧㄢ ㄍㄨㄛˊ ㄩㄣˋ ㄉㄨㄥˋ
Gwoyeu RomatzyhTaypyng tiangwo yunndonq
Wade–GilesT'ai4-p'ing2 t'ien1-kuo2 yün4-tung4
IPA[tʰâi.pʰǐŋ tʰjɛ́n.kwǒ ŷn.tʊ̂ŋ]
Wu
RomanizationTha bin thi koq hhyn don
Hakka
RomanizationThai-phìn-thiên-koet yun-thung
Yue: Cantonese
Yale RomanizationTaai pìhng tīn gwok wahn duhng
JyutpingTaai3-peng4 tin1-gwok3 wan6-dung6
IPA[tʰāːi.pʰɛ̏ːŋ tʰíːn.kʷɔ̄ːk̚ wɐ̀n.tòŋ]
Southern Min
Hokkien POJThài-pêng-thian-kok ūn-tōng
Eastern Min
Fuzhou BUCTái-bìng-tiĕng-guók ông-dông

The Taiping Rebellion, also known as the Taiping Civil War or the Taiping Revolution, was a massive rebellion or civil war that was waged in China from 1850 to 1864, between the Manchu Qing dynasty and the Hakka-led Taiping Heavenly Kingdom – though following the fall of Nanjing the last rebel army was not wiped out until 1871. After fighting the bloodiest civil war in world history, with 30 to 50 million dead, the established Qing government won decisively, although the outcome is considered a pyrrhic victory.[5]

The uprising was commanded by Hong Xiuquan, an ethnic Hakka (a Han Chinese subgroup) and the self-proclaimed brother of Jesus Christ. Its goals were religious, nationalist, and political in nature; Hong sought the conversion of the Han Chinese people to the Taiping's syncretic version of Christianity, to overthrow the Manchus-led Qing Dynasty, and a state transformation.[6][7] Rather than supplanting the ruling class, the Taipings sought to upend the moral and social order of China.[8] The Taipings established the Heavenly Kingdom as an oppositional state based in Tianjing (now Nanjing) and gained control of a significant part of southern China, eventually expanding to command a population base of nearly 30 million people.

For more than a decade, the Taiping occupied and fought across much of the mid and lower Yangtze valley, ultimately devolving into total civil war. It was the largest in China since the Manchu conquest of China in 1644, involving every province of China proper except Gansu. It ranks as one of the bloodiest wars in human history, the bloodiest civil war, and the largest conflict of the 19th century. In terms of deaths, the civil war is comparable to World War I.[9][4] 30 million people fled the conquered regions to foreign settlements or other parts of China.[10] The Taiping were extremely intolerant: they carried out widespread massacres of Manchus, the ethnic minority of the ruling Imperial House of Aisin-Gioro, whom they believed to be demons, and forced strict religious mandates on their people.

Weakened severely by an attempted coup (the Tianjing incident) and the failure of the siege of Beijing, the Taipings were defeated by decentralized, irregular armies such as the Xiang Army commanded by Zeng Guofan. Having already moved down the Yangtze River and recaptured the important city of Anqing, Zeng's Xiang Army besieged Nanjing during May, 1862. Two years later, on June 1, 1864, Hong Xiuquan died and Nanjing fell during the Third Battle of Nanjing, barely a month later. The 14 year civil war greatly weakened the Qing dynasty, which would collapse less than 50 years after the end of the war. It exacerbated sectarian tension and accelerated the rise of regionalism, foreshadowing the Warlord Era that would come after another Hakka, Sun Yat-Sen, overthrew the Qing in the 1911 Xinhai Revolution.

Contents

  • 1Names
  • 2History
    • 2.1Origins
    • 2.2Early years
    • 2.3Middle years
    • 2.4Fall of the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom
    • 2.5Aftermath
    • 2.6Death toll
    • 2.7Concurrent rebellions
  • 3Taiping Heavenly Kingdom's policies
  • 4Military
    • 4.1Taiping forces
      • 4.1.1Ethnic structure of the Taiping army
      • 4.1.2Social structure of the Taiping Army
    • 4.2Qing forces
  • 5Total war
  • 6Legacy
  • 7In popular culture
  • 8Relationship with the Western powers
  • 9See also
  • 10References
  • 11Sources
    • 11.1Modern monographs and surveys
    • 11.2Scholarly articles
    • 11.3Primary sources
  • 12Further reading
    • 12.1Modern monographs and surveys
    • 12.2Scholarly articles
    • 12.3Fiction
    • 12.4Contemporaneous accounts
  • 13External links

Names

The terms which writers use for the conflict and its participants often represent their different opinions. During the 19th century, the Qing did not describe the conflict as either a civil war or a movement because doing so would have lent credibility to the Taiping, instead, they referred to the tumultuous civil war as a period of chaos (亂), rebellion (逆) or military ascendancy (軍興).[11] They often referred to it as the Hong-Yang Rebellion (洪楊之亂), referring to the two most prominent leaders. It was also dismissively referred to as the Red Sheep Rebellion (紅羊之亂) because "Hong-Yang" sounds like "Red Sheep" in Chinese.[12]


In modern China, the war is often referred to as the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom Movement, due to the fact that the Taiping espoused a doctrine which was both nationalist and communist, and the Taiping represented a popular ideology which was based on either Han nationalism or protocommunist values. The scholar Jian Youwen is among those who refer to the rebellion as the "Taiping Revolutionary Movement" on the grounds that it worked towards a complete change in the political and social system, rather than working towards the replacement of one dynasty with another.[6] Many Western historians refer to the conflict in general as the "Taiping Rebellion". Recently, however, scholars such as Tobie Meyer-Fong and Stephen Platt have argued that the term "Taiping Rebellion" is biased because it insinuates that the Qing government was a legitimate government which was fighting against the illegitimate Taiping rebels. Instead, they argue that the conflict should be called a "civil war".[11] Other historians such as Jürgen Osterhammel term the conflict "Taiping Revolution" because of the rebels' radical transformational objectives and the social revolution that they initiated.[13]

Little is known about how the Taiping referred to the war, but the Taiping often referred to the Qing in general and the Manchus in particular as some variant of demons or monsters (妖), representing Hong's proclamation that they were fighting a holy war to rid the world of demons and establish paradise on earth.[14] The Qing referred to the Taiping as Yue Bandits (粵匪 or 粵賊) in official sources, a reference was made to their origins in the southeastern province of Guangdong. More colloquially, the Chinese called the Taiping some variant of Long-Hairs (長毛鬼、長髪鬼、髪逆、髪賊), because they did not shave their foreheads and braid their hair into a queue as Qing subjects were obligated to do, allowing their hair to grow long.[11] In the 19th century, Western observers, depending on their ideology, referred to the Taiping as the "revolutionaries", "insurgents" or "rebels". In English, the Heavenly Kingdom of Peace has often been shortened to simply the Taipings, from the word "Peace" in the Heavenly Kingdom of Peace, but it was never a term that either the Taipings or their enemies used to refer to them.[citation needed]



History

Origins

During the 19th century, the Qing dynasty experienced a series of famines, natural disasters, economic problems and defeats at the hands of foreign powers; these events have come to be collectively known as China's "century of humiliation".[15] Farmers were heavily overtaxed, rents rose dramatically, and peasants started to desert their lands in droves.[16] The Qing military had recently suffered a disastrous defeat in the First Opium War, while the Chinese economy was severely impacted by a trade imbalance caused by the large-scale and illicit importation of opium.[17] Banditry became more common, and numerous secret societies and self-defense units formed, all of which led to an increase in small-scale warfare.[18]

A drawing of Hong Xiuquan, dating from about 1860.

Meanwhile, the population of China had increased rapidly, nearly doubling between 1766 and 1833, while the amount of cultivated land was stable.[19] The government, commanded by ethnic Manchus, had become increasingly corrupt. It was weak in the southern regions where local clans dominated.[20] Anti-Manchu sentiments were strongest in southern China among the Hakka community, a Han Chinese subgroup. Meanwhile, Christian missionaries were active.[21]

In 1837 Hong Xiuquan, a Hakka from a poor village in Guangdong, once again failed the imperial examination, frustrating his ambition to become a scholar-official in the civil service. He returned home, fell sick and was bedridden for several days, during which he experienced mystical visions.[22][23][24] In 1843, after carefully reading a pamphlet which he had received from a Protestant Christian missionary several years earlier, Hong declared that he now understood that his vision meant that he was the younger brother of Jesus and that he had been sent to rid China of the "devils", including the corrupt Qing government and Confucian teachings.[25][26] In 1847 Hong went to Guangzhou, where he studied the Bible with Issachar Jacox Roberts, an American Baptist missionary.[27] Roberts refused to baptize him and later stated that Hong's followers were "bent on making their burlesque religious pretensions serve their political purpose".[28]

Qing dynasty, c. 1820

Soon after Hong began preaching across Guangxi in 1844, his follower Feng Yunshan founded the God Worshipping Society, a movement which followed Hong's fusion of Christianity, Daoism, Confucianism and indigenous millenarianism, which Hong presented as a restoration of the ancient Chinese faith in Shangdi.[29][30][31] The Taiping faith, says one historian, "developed into a dynamic new Chinese religion ... Taiping Christianity".[31] The movement at first grew by suppressing groups of bandits and pirates in southern China in the late 1840s, then suppression by Qing authorities led it to evolve into guerrilla warfare and subsequently a widespread civil war. Eventually, two other God Worshippers claimed to possess the ability to speak as members of the "Celestial Family", the Father in the case of Yang Xiuqing and Jesus Christ in the case of Xiao Chaogui.[32][33]

Early Years

The Taiping Rebellion began in the southern province of Guangxi when local officials launched a campaign of religious persecution against the God Worshipping Society. In early January 1851, following a small-scale battle in late December 1850, a 10,000-strong rebel army organized by Feng Yunshan and Wei Changhui routed Qing forces stationed in Jintian (present-day Guiping, Guangxi). Taiping forces successfully repulsed an attempted imperial reprisal by the Green Standard Army against the Jintian uprising.

On January 11, 1851, Hong declared himself the Heavenly King of the Heavenly Kingdom of Peace (or Taiping Heavenly Kingdom), from which comes the term "Taipings" is commonly used for them in English language studies. The Taipings began marching north in September 1851 to escape Qing forces closing in on them. The Taiping army pressed north into Hunan following the Xiang River, besieging Changsha, occupying Yuezhou, and then capturing Wuchang in December 1852 after reaching the Yangtze River. At this point the Taiping leadership decided to move east along the Yangtze River. Anqing was captured in February 1852.

Taiping leaders may have reached out to Triad organizations, which had many cells in South China and among government troops. Taiping titles echoed Triad usage, whether consciously or not, which made it more attractive for Triads to join the movement.[34][35] In 1852, Qing government troops captured Hong Daquan, a rebel who had assumed the title Tian De Wang (King of Heavenly Virtue). Hong Daquan's confession claimed that Hong Xiuquan had made him co-sovereign of the Heavenly Kingdom and given him that title, but was more likely an echo of an earlier but unconnected White Lotus Rebellion. However, the capture of Nanjing in that year led to a deterioration of relations between the Taiping rebels and the triads.[36]

Middle Years

The Royal seal of the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom.

On March 19, 1853, the Taipings captured the city of Nanjing and Hong declared it the Heavenly Capital of his kingdom. Since the Taipings considered the Manchus to be demons, they first killed all the Manchu men, then forced the Manchu women outside the city and burned them to death.[37] Shortly thereafter, the Taiping launched concurrent Northern and Western expeditions, in an effort to relieve pressure on Nanjing and achieve significant territorial gains.[38][39] The former expedition was a complete failure but the latter achieved limited success.[39][40]

In 1853 Hong Xiuquan withdrew from active control of policies and administration to rule exclusively by written proclamations. He lived in luxury and had many women in his inner chamber, and often issued religious strictures. He clashed with Yang Xiuqing, who challenged his often impractical policies, and became suspicious of Yang's ambitions, his extensive network of spies and his claims of authority when "speaking as God". This tension culminated in the 1856 Tianjing Incident, wherein Yang and his followers were slaughtered by Wei Changhui, Qin Rigang, and their troops on Hong Xiuquan's orders.[41] Shi Dakai's objection to the bloodshed led to his family and retinue being killed by Wei and Qin with Wei ultimately planning to imprison Hong.[42] Wei's plans were ultimately thwarted and he and Qin were executed by Hong.[42] Shi Dakai was given control of five Taiping armies, which were consolidated into one. But fearing for his life, he departed from Tianjing and headed west towards Sichuan.

With Hong withdrawn from view and Yang out of the picture, the remaining Taiping leaders[who?] tried to widen their popular support and forge alliances with European powers, but failed on both counts. The Europeans decided to stay officially neutral, though European military advisors served with the Qing army.

Inside China, the rebellion faced resistance from the traditionalist rural classes because of hostility to Chinese customs and Confucian values. The landowning upper class, unsettled by the Taiping ideology and the policy of strict separation of the sexes, even for married couples, sided with government forces.

In Hunan, a local irregular army called the Xiang Army or Hunan Army, under the personal leadership of Zeng Guofan, became the main armed force fighting for the Qing against the Taiping. Zeng's Xiang Army proved effective in gradually turning back the Taiping advance in the western theater of the war and ultimately retaking much of Hubei and Jiangxi provinces. In December 1856 Qing forces retook Wuchang for the final time. The Xiang Army captured Jiujiang in May 1858 and then the rest of Jiangxi province by September.

In 1859 Hong Rengan, Hong Xiuquan's cousin, joined the Taiping forces in Nanjing and was given considerable power by Hong.[37] Hong Rengan developed an ambitious plan to expand the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom's boundaries.

In May 1860 the Taiping defeated the imperial forces that had been besieging Nanjing since 1853, eliminating them from the region and opening the way for a successful invasion of southern Jiangsu and Zhejiang provinces, the wealthiest region of the Qing Empire. The Taiping rebels were successful in taking Hangzhou on March 19, 1860, Changzhou on May 26, and Suzhou on June 2 to the east. While Taiping forces were preoccupied in Jiangsu, Zeng's forces moved down the Yangtze River.

Fall of the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom

Qing troops retaking Suzhou city

An attempt to take Shanghai in August 1860 was repulsed by an army of Qing troops supported by European officers under the command of Frederick Townsend Ward assisted by local strategic support of the French diplomat Albert-Édouard Levieux de Caligny. This army would become known as the "Ever Victorious Army", a seasoned and well trained Qing military force commanded by Charles George Gordon, and would be instrumental in the defeat of the Taiping rebels.

In 1861, around the time of the death of the Xianfeng Emperor and ascension of the Tongzhi Emperor, Zeng Guofan's Xiang Army captured Anqing with help from a naval blockade imposed by the Royal Navy on the city.[43] Near the end of 1861 the Taipings launched a final Eastern Expedition. Ningbo was easily captured on December 9, and Hangzhou was besieged and finally captured on December 31, 1861. Taiping troops surrounded Shanghai in January 1862, but were unable to capture it.

The Ever-Victorious Army repulsed another attack on Shanghai in 1862 and helped to defend other treaty ports such as Ningbo, reclaimed on May 10. They also aided imperial troops in reconquering Taiping strongholds along the Yangtze River.

In 1863, Shi Dakai surrendered to the Qing near the Sichuan capital Chengdu and was executed by slow-slicing.[44] Some of his followers escaped or were released and continued the fight against the Qing.

Qing forces were reorganised under the command of Zeng Guofan, Zuo Zongtang and Li Hongzhang, and the Qing reconquest began in earnest. Zeng Guofan began in Hunan by recruiting a peasant army, later known as the Xiang Army, based on the teachings of the 16th century Ming-dynasty general Qi Jiguang.[citation needed] By early 1864, Qing control in most areas had been reestablished.[45]

In May 1862, the Xiang Army began directly besieging Nanjing and managed to hold firm despite numerous attempts by the numerically superior Taiping Army to dislodge them. Hong Xiuquan declared that God would defend Nanjing, but in June 1864, with Qing forces approaching, he died of food poisoning as a consequence of eating wild vegetables when the city ran low on food supplies. He was sick for 20 days before succumbing and a few days after his death, Qing forces took the city. His body was buried in the former Ming Imperial Palace, and was later exhumed on orders of Zeng Guofan to verify his death, and then cremated. Hong's ashes were later blasted out of a cannon in order to ensure that his remains have no resting place as eternal punishment for the uprising.

Four months before the fall of the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom, Hong Xiuquan abdicated in favor of his eldest son, Hong Tianguifu, who was 15 years old. The younger Hong was inexperienced and powerless, so the kingdom was quickly destroyed when Nanjing fell in July 1864 to the imperial armies after protracted street-by-street fighting. Tianguifu and few others escaped but were soon caught and executed. Most of the Taiping princes were executed. A small remainder of loyal Taiping forces had continued to fight in northern Zhejiang, rallying around Tianguifu, but after Tianguifu's capture on October 25, 1864, Taiping resistance was gradually pushed into the highlands of Jiangxi, Zhejiang, Fujian and finally Guangdong, where one of the last Taiping loyalists, Wang Haiyang, was defeated on January 29, 1866.


Aftermath

A historic monument to the Taiping Rebellion in Mengshan town, in Wuzhou, Guangxi, which was an early seat of Government of the Taiping

Although the fall of Nanjing in 1864 marked the destruction of the Taiping regime, the fight was not yet over. There were still several hundred thousand Taiping troops continuing the fight, with more than a quarter-million fighting in the border regions of Jiangxi and Fujian alone. It was not until August 1871 that the last Taiping army led by Shi Dakai's commander, Li Fuzhong (李福忠, was completely wiped out by government forces in the border region of Hunan, Guizhou and Guangxi.[46]

Taiping wars also spilled over into Vietnam with devastating effects. In 1860, Wu Lingyun (吳凌雲), an ethnic Zhuang Taiping leader, proclaimed himself King of Dingling (廷陵國) in the Sino-Vietnamese border regions. Dingling was destroyed during a Qing campaign in 1868, his son Wu Yazhong, also called Wu Kun (吳鯤) fled to Vietnam but was killed in 1869 in Bắc Ninh by a Qing-Vietnamese coalition. Wu Kun's troops broke up and became marauding armies such as the Yellow Flag Army led by Huang Chongying (黃崇英) and the Black Flag Army (Chinese: 黑旗軍; pinyin: Hēiqí Jūn; Vietnamese: Quân cờ đen) led by Liu Yongfu. The latter would become a prominent warlord in Upper Tonkin and would later help the Nguyễn dynasty to engage against the French during the Sino-French War in the 1880s. He later became the second and last leader of the short-lived Republic of Formosa (5 June–21 October 1895).

Other "Flag Gangs" armed with the latest weapons, disintegrated into bandit groups that plundered remnants of the Lan Xang kingdom, and were then engaged in combat against the incompetent forces of King Rama V (r. 1868–1910) until 1890, when the last of the groups eventually disbanded. Their victims did not know where the bandits had come from and, when they plundered Buddhist temples, they were mistaken for Chinese Muslims from Yunnan called Hui in Mandarin and Haw in the Lao language (Thai: ฮ่อ,[47]) which resulted in the protracted series of conflicts being misnamed the Haw wars.

Death Toll

With no reliable census at the time, estimates of the death toll of the rebellion are necessarily based on projections. The most widely cited sources estimate the total number of deaths during the 15 years of the rebellion to be approximately 20–30 million civilians and soldiers; a recent Chinese study estimates up to 70 million deaths.[48][49] Most of the deaths were attributed to plague and famine.

Concurrent Rebellions

A battle of the Panthay Rebellion, from the set Victory over the Muslims, set of twelve paintings in ink and color on silk

The Nian Rebellion (1853–1868), and several Chinese Muslim rebellions in the southwest (Panthay Rebellion, 1855–1873) and the northwest (Dungan revolt, 1862–1877) continued to pose considerable problems for the Qing dynasty.

Occasionally the Nian rebels would collaborate with Taiping forces, for instance during the Northern Expedition.[50] As the Taiping rebellion lost ground, particularly after the fall of Nanjing in 1864, former Taiping soldiers and commanders like Lai Wenguang were incorporated into Nian ranks.

After the failure of the Red Turban Rebellion (1854–1856) to capture Guangzhou, their soldiers retreated north into Jiangxi and combined forces with Shi Dakai.[51] After the defeat of the Li Yonghe and Lan Chaoding rebellion in Sichuan, remnants combined with Taiping forces in Shaanxi.[52] Remnant forces of the Small Swords Society uprising in Shanghai regrouped with the Taiping army.[53]

Du Wenxiu, who led the Panthay Rebellion in Yunnan, was in contact with the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom. He was not aiming his rebellion at Han Chinese, but was anti-Qing and wanted to destroy the Qing government.[54][55] Du's forces led multiple non-Muslim forces, including Han Chinese, Li, Bai, and Hani peoples.[56] They were assisted by non-Muslim Shan and Kakhyen and other hill tribes in the revolt.[57]

The other Muslim rebellion, the Dungan revolt, was the reverse: it was not aimed at overthrowing the Qing dynasty since its leader Ma Hualong accepted an imperial title. Rather, it erupted due to intersectional fighting between Muslim factions and Han Chinese. Various groups fought each other during the Dungan revolt without any coherent goal.[58] According to modern researchers,[59] the Dungan rebellion began in 1862 not as a planned uprising but as a coalescence of many local brawls and riots triggered by trivial causes, among these were false rumours that the Hui Muslims were aiding the Taiping rebels. However, the Hui Ma Xiaoshi claimed that the Shaanxi Muslim rebellion was connected to the Taiping.[60]

Jonathan Spence says that a key reason for the Taiping's defeat was its overall inability to coordinate with other rebellions.[61]

 Taiping Heavenly Kingdom's Policies


Main article: Taiping Heavenly Kingdom
A miniature of the Palace of Heavenly Kingdom in Nanjing
The Heavenly King's throne in Nanjing

The rebels announced social reforms, including strict separation of the sexes, abolition of foot binding, land socialisation, and "suppression" of private trade; they also outlawed the importation of opium into all Taiping territories.[62] In regards to religion, the Kingdom tried to replace Confucianism, Buddhism and Chinese folk religion with the Taiping's version of Christianity, God Worshipping, which held that Hong Xiuquan was the younger brother of Jesus. The libraries of the Buddhist monasteries were destroyed, almost completely in the case of the Yangtze Delta area.[63] Temples of Daoism, Confucianism, and other traditional beliefs were often defaced.[51] Traditionalist works like those of Confucious were burned and their sellers executed. The Taiping were especially oppossed to idolatry, destroying idols wherever found with great prejudice. Though the destruction of idols was initially welcomed by foreign missionaries, missionaries eventually came to fear the zealotry of the Taiping that they had a hand in creating. Separation of the sexes was strictly enforced in the first few years, although it tapered off in later years. Part of the extremeness came from a mistranslation of the Ten Commandments, which led to the seventh commandment also forbidding "licentiousness" as well as adultery. It was so severe that parents and children of the opposite sex could not interact, and even married couples were discouraged from having sex.[64]


 Military

Taiping Forces

The Taiping army was the rebellion's key strength. It was marked by a high level of discipline and fanaticism.[citation needed] They typically wore a uniform of red jackets with blue trousers, and grew their hair long so in China they were nicknamed "long hair". In the beginning of the rebellion, the large numbers of women serving in the Taiping army also distinguished it from other 19th-century armies. However, after 1853 there ceased being many women in the Taiping army. Hong Xuanjiao, Su Sanniang and Qiu Ersao are examples of women who became leaders of the Taiping army's female soldiers.

Combat was always bloody and extremely brutal, with little artillery but huge forces equipped with small arms. Both armies would attempt to push each other off of the battlefield, and though casualties were high, few battles were decisively won. The Taiping army's main strategy of conquest was to take major cities, consolidate their hold on the cities, then march out into the surrounding countryside to recruit local farmers and battle government forces. Estimates of the overall size of the Taiping army are around 2,000,000 soldiers. The army's organization was allegedly inspired by that of the Qin dynasty. Each army corp consisted of roughly 13,000 men. These corps were placed into armies of varying sizes. In addition to the main Taiping forces organised along the above lines, there were also thousands of pro-Taiping groups fielding their own forces of irregulars.

The rebels were relatively well-equipped with modern weapons. They were not supported by foreign governments, but they bought modern munitions - including firearms, artillery, and ammunition - from foreign suppliers; the rebels were buying weapons by 1853.[65] Munitions - partially sourced from Western manufacturers and military stores - were smuggled into China, mainly by English and Americans. An April 1862 shipment from an American dealer "well known for their dealings with rebels" included 2,783 (percussion cap) muskets, 66 carbines, 4 rifles, and 895 field artillery guns; the dealer carried passports signed by the Loyal King. The rebels also manufactured weapons, and imported manufacturing equipment. In the summer of 1862, a Western observer noted that rebel factories in Nanjing were producing superior guns - including heavy cannon - than the Qing. The rebels augmented their modern arsenal with captured equipment.[66] Just before his execution, Taiping Loyal King Li Xiucheng advised the Qing to buy, and to learn how to replicate, the best foreign cannon and gun carriages to prepare for war with foreign powers.[67]

As early as 1853, foreigners from various countries joined the rebels in combat and administrative roles, and were in a position to observe the Taiping in battle. The rebels were courageous under fire, erected defensive works quickly, and used mobile pontoon bridges. One tactic was to ring a Qing emplacement in fire, and killing the fleeing Qing troops as they emerged individually.[65]

There was also a small Taiping Navy, composed of captured boats, that operated along the Yangtze and its tributaries. Among the Navy's commanders was the Hang King Tang Zhengcai.

Ethnic Structure of the Taiping Army


See also: Ethnic minorities in China and List of ethnic groups in China


Ethnically, the Taiping army was at the outset formed largely from these groups: the Hakka, a Han Chinese subgroup; the Cantonese, local residents of Guangdong province; and the Zhuang (a non-Han ethnic group). It is no coincidence that Hong Xiuquan and the other Taiping royals were Hakka.

As a Han subgroup, the Hakka were frequently marginalised economically and politically, having migrated to the regions which their descendants presently inhabit only after other Han groups were already established there. For example, when the Hakka settled in Guangdong and parts of Guangxi, speakers of Yue Chinese (Cantonese) were already the dominant regional Han group there and they had been so for some time, just as speakers of various dialects of Min are locally dominant in Fujian province.

The Hakka settled throughout southern China and beyond, but as latecomers they generally had to establish their communities on rugged, less fertile land scattered on the fringes of the local majority group's settlements. As their name ("guest households") suggests, the Hakka were generally treated as migrant newcomers, and often subjected to hostility and derision from the local majority Han populations. Consequently, the Hakka, to a greater extent than other Han Chinese, have been historically associated with popular unrest and rebellion.

The retaking of Nanjing by Qing troops

The other significant ethnic group in the Taiping army was the Zhuang, an indigenous people of Tai origin and China's largest non-Han ethnic minority group. Over the centuries, Zhuang communities had been adopting Han Chinese culture. This was possible because Han culture in the region accommodates a great deal of linguistic diversity, so the Zhuang could be absorbed as if the Zhuang language were just another Han Chinese dialect (which it is not). Because Zhuang communities were integrating with the Han at different rates, a certain amount of friction between the Han and the Zhuang was inevitable, with Zhuang unrest leading to armed uprisings on occasion.[68]

Social structure of the Taiping Army

Socially and economically, the Taiping rebels came almost exclusively from the lowest classes. Many of the southern Taiping troops were former miners, especially those coming from the Zhuang. Very few Taiping rebels, even in the leadership caste, came from the imperial bureaucracy. Almost none were landlords and in occupied territories landlords were often executed.

Qing Forces

Main article: Military of the Qing dynasty
A scene of the Taiping Rebellion

Opposing the rebellion was an imperial army with over a million regulars and unknown thousands of regional militias and foreign mercenaries operating in support. Among the imperial forces was the elite Ever Victorious Army, consisting of Chinese soldiers led by a Western officer corps (see Frederick Townsend Ward and Charles Gordon) and supplied by European arms companies like Willoughbe & Ponsonby.[69] A particularly famous imperial force was Zeng Guofan's Xiang Army. Zuo Zongtang from Hunan province was another important Qing general who contributed in suppressing the Taiping Rebellion. Where the armies under the control of dynasty itself were unable to defeat the Taiping, these gentry-led Yong Ying armies were able to succeed.[70]

Although keeping accurate records was something imperial China traditionally did very well, the decentralized nature of the imperial war effort (relying on regional forces) and the fact that the war was a civil war and therefore very chaotic, meant that reliable figures are impossible to find. The destruction of the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom also meant that the majority of any records it possessed were destroyed, the percentage of records said to have survived is around 10%.

Over the course of the conflict, around 90% of recruits to the Taiping side would be killed or defect.[71]

The organisation of the Qing Imperial Army was thus:

  • Eight Banners Army: 250,000 soldiers[72]
  • Green Standard Army: ~610,000 soldiers[73]
  • Xiang (Hunan) Army: 130,000 soldiers[74]
  • Huai (Anhui) Army: 70,000 soldiers[74]
  • Chu Army: 40,000 soldiers[74]
  • Ever Victorious Army: 5,000 soldiers[75]
  • Village Militias: unknown thousands


 Total War


The Taiping Rebellion was a total war. Almost every citizen who had not fled the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom was given military training and conscripted into the army to fight against Qing imperial forces. Under the Taiping household registration system, one adult male from each household was tobe conscripted into the Army.[76]

During this conflict, both sides tried to deprive each other of the resources which they needed in order to continue the war and it became standard practice for each to destroy the opposing side's agricultural areas, butcher the populations of cities and generally exact a brutal price from the inhabitants of captured enemy lands in order to drastically weaken the opposition's war effort. This war was total in the sense that civilians on both sides participated in the war effort to a significant extent and the armies on both sides waged war against both the civilian population and military forces. Contemporary accounts describe the amount of desolation which befell rural areas as a result of the conflict.[50]

In every area which they captured, the Taiping immediately exterminated the entire Manchu population. In the province of Hunan one Qing loyalist who observed the genocidal massacres which the Taiping forces committed against the Manchus wrote that the "pitiful Manchus", the Manchu men, women and children were executed by the Taiping forces. The Taiping rebels were seen chanting while slaughtering the Manchus in Hefei.[77] After capturing Nanjing, Taiping forces killed about 40,000 Manchu civilians.[78] On 27 October 1853 they crossed the Yellow River in T'sang-chou and murdered 10,000 Manchus.[79]

Since the rebellion began in Guangxi, Qing forces allowed no rebels speaking its dialect to surrender.[80] Reportedly in the province of Guangdong, it is written that 1,000,000 were executed because after the collapse of the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom, the Qing dynasty launched waves of massacres against the Hakkas, that at their height killed up to 30,000 each day.[81][82] These policies of mass murder of civilians occurred elsewhere in China, including Anhui,[83][84] and Nanjing.[85] This resulted in a massive civilian flight and death toll with some 600 towns destroyed[86] and other bloody policies resulting.

Legacy

Beyond the staggering amount of human and economic devastation which resulted from it, the Taiping Rebellion led to lasting changes within the late Qing dynasty. Power was, to a limited extent, decentralized, and ethnic Han Chinese officials were more widely employed in high positions than they had previously been.[87] The traditional Manchu banner forces upon which the Qing dynasty depended had failed. They were gradually replaced with the use of personally-organized armies. Those armies evolved into forces used by local war lords who dominated China after the fall of the Qing dynasty.[88][89] Ultimately, the Taiping Rebellion inspired Sun Yat-sen and other future revolutionaries, and some surviving Taiping veterans even joined the Revive China Society[90] as well as the Chinese Communist Party, which characterised the rebellion as a proto-communist uprising.[91]

Famine, disease and massacres, along with social disruption, led to a sharp decline in population, especially in the Yangtze delta region. The result was a shortage in labor supply for the first time in centuries, and labor became relatively more valuable than land.[92]

Merchants in Shanxi and the Huizhou region of Anhui became less prominent because the rebellion disrupted trade in much of the country.[92] However, trade in coastal regions, especially in Guangzhou (Canton) and Ningbo was less affected by violence than trade in inland areas was. Streams of refugees who entered Shanghai contributed to the economic development of the city, which was previously less commercially relevant than other cities in the area were. Only a tenth of Taiping-published records survive to this day because they were mostly destroyed by the Qing in an attempt to rewrite the history of the conflict.[93] 3

Historian John King Fairbank compares the Taiping rebels with the communists under Mao Zedong who came to power a century later:

In addition to the zeal, vigor, and puritanical discipline so often found in new political movements, they shared certain traditional Chinese interests, such as propagating and maintaining doctrinal orthodoxy, recruiting an elite of talent, realizing a utopian social order, and developing military power based on farmer-soldiers. Furthermore, both made use of foreign ideologies which required translation into Chinese with inevitable modifications in the process.[94]

    In Popular  Culture

The Taiping Rebellion has been treated in historical novels. Robert Elegant's 1983 Mandarin depicts the time from the point of view of a Jewish family living in Shanghai.[95] In Flashman and the Dragon, the fictional Harry Paget Flashman recounts his adventures during the Second Opium War and the Taiping Rebellion. In Lisa See's novel Snow Flower and the Secret Fan the title character is married to a man who lives in Jintian and the characters get caught up in the action. Amy Tan's The Hundred Secret Senses takes place in part during the time of the Taiping Rebellion. Rebels of the Heavenly Kingdom by Katherine Paterson is a young adult novel set during the Taiping Rebellion. Li Bo's Tienkuo: The Heavenly Kingdom takes place within the Taiping capital at Nanjing [96]

The war has also been depicted in television shows and films. In 2000 CCTV produced The Taiping Heavenly Kingdom, a 46-episode series about the Taiping Rebellion. In 1988 Hong Kong's TVB produced Twilight of a Nation, a 45-episode drama about the Taiping Rebellion. The Warlords is a 2007 historical film set in the 1860s showing Gen. Pang Qinyun, leader of the Shan Regiment, as responsible for the capture of Suzhou and Nanjing.


 Relationship with the Western Powers

The Taiping government maintained an ambivalent relationship with the Western powers who were active in China during this period.[62] Due to the religious aspects of the rebellion, the Taiping government perceived Westerners as "brothers and sisters from overseas".[62] The Taiping government proved especially welcoming to Western missionaries.[62] In 1853, Hong Xiuquan invited American missionary Issachar Jacox Roberts to come to Nanking to aid in the administration of his government.[97] After Roberts arrived in Nanking in 1861 and met with Hong, he was commissioned by him as the director of foreign affairs.[97]

While some missionaries like Roberts were enthusiastic in the first few years about the Taiping rebellion, Western skepticism existed from the inception of the rebellion.[62] According to historian Prescott Clarke, Westerners in China became separated into two different groups in regards to their views on the rebellion, with one side depicting the rebels as mere robbers whose intention was to gather wealth through revolting against the Qing, and the other side depicting the rebel army as religious fanatics provoked by skillful leaders to fight against the Qing to the death.[98]

The government officials of the Western powers were optimistic about the Taiping government's chance of victory in the early stages.[99] According to historian Eugene P. Boardman, the Qing dynasty's enforcement of the treaty of 1842–1844 was frustrating the American and English officials, especially in terms of open trade.[99] According to Boardman the Christian nature of the Taiping opened up the possibility for a more cooperative trade partnership. Many Western officials visited the capital of Taiping between 1863 and 1864, and American commissioner Robert Milligan McLane considered granting official recognition of the Taiping government.[99]

According to Clarke the Western missionaries changed their opinions upon further inspections of the rebellion.[98] That change was captured in a letter from the American missionary Divie Bethune McCartee. Upon visiting Nanking, McCartee described the situation in the city as "Dreadful destruction of life." As for the actual practice of Christianity in the city, McCartee said "I saw no signs of anything resembling Christianity in or near Nanking".[100] Similarly to McCartee, Hong's director of foreign affairs I. J. Roberts wrote, "His religious toleration, and multiplicity of chapels turns out to be a farce, of no avail in the spread of Christianity – worse than useless."[97]

After the conclusion of the Second Opium War, Royal Navy officer Sir James Hope led a expedition to Nanking in February 1861.[98] This expedition was the largest party of Westerners to visit Taiping territories, with the inclusion of many British military personnel, entrepreneurs, missionaries, other unofficial observers and two French representatives.[98] Upon visiting the capital, some members of the expedition wrote that "devastation marked our journey" in reference to the conditions in Taiping territories.[101] Some reports suggested a great deal of indiscriminate slaughter of civilians conducted by the Taiping army in newly controlled areas.[101] In late 1861, Hope made a brief visit to Nanking to come to an agreement with the Taiping rebels not to attack the city of Shanghai, a proposal which was refused by the Taiping government.[102] According to Clarke, this refusal of cooperation and Taiping's occupation of Ningpo in December led to the limited intervention against the rebellion by the British and French in the following years.[98]  

 See Also

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Taiping Rebellion.
  • Boxer Rebellion
  • Christianity in China
  • List of revolutions and rebellions
  • List of wars and anthropogenic disasters by death toll
  • Miao Rebellion (1854–1873)
  • Nian Rebellion
  • Punti-Hakka Clan Wars
  • Millennarianism in colonial societies

 

References

  1. ^ Heath (1994), pp. 11–16.
  2. ^ Heath (1994), p. 4.
  3. ^ Heath (1994), p. 7.
  4. ^ Jump up to:a b Platt (2012), p. p. xxiii.
  5. ^ Osterhammel (2015), pp. 652–54.
  6. ^ Jump up to:a b Jian Youwen (1973), pp. 4–7.
  7. ^ C. A. Curwen, Taiping Rebel: The Deposition of Li Hsiu-ch'eng 1 (1977)
  8. ^ Michael (1966), p. 7.
  9. ^ https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/12582157-global-trends
  10. ^ Bickers, Robert; Jackson, Isabella (2016). Treaty Ports in Modern China: Law, Land and Power. p. 224. ISBN 978-1-317-26628-0.
  11. ^ Jump up to:a b c Meyer-Fong (2013), pp. 11–12.
  12. ^ Meyer-Fong, Tobie. "War". What Remains: Coming to Terms with Civil War in 19th Century China. Stanford University Press, September 26, 2013.
  13. ^ Osterhammel (2015), pp. 652–654.
  14. ^ Spence (1996), pp. 115–16, 160–163, 181–82.
  15. ^ Chesneaux, Jean. Peasant Revolts in China, 1840–1949. Translated by C. A. Curwen. New York: W. W. Norton, 1973. pp. 23–24
  16. ^ Michael (1966), p. 4,10.
  17. ^ Michael (1966), pp. 15–16.
  18. ^ Michael (1966), pp. 10–12.
  19. ^ Michael (1966), pp. 14–15.
  20. ^ C. A. Curwen, Taiping Rebel: The Deposition of Li Hsiu-ch'eng (1977) p. 2
  21. ^ Pamela Kyle Crossley, The Wobbling Pivot: China Since 1800 (2010) 103
  22. ^ Jian Youwen (1973), pp. 15–18.
  23. ^ Michael (1966), p. 23.
  24. ^ Spence (1996), pp. 47–49.
  25. ^ Jian Youwen (1973), p. 20.
  26. ^ Spence (1996), p. 64.
  27. ^ Teng, Yuah Chung. "Reverend Issachar Jacox Roberts and the Taiping Rebellion". The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol 23, No. 1 (November 1963), pp. 55–67
  28. ^ Rhee, Hong Beom (2007). Asian Millenarianism: An Interdisciplinary Study of the Taiping and Tonghak Rebellions in a Global Context. Youngstown, New York: Cambria Press. pp. 163, 172, 186–187, 191. ISBN 978-1-934043-42-4.
  29. ^ Spence (1996), pp. 78–80.
  30. ^ Kilcourse (2016), p. [page needed].
  31. ^ Jump up to:a b Reilly (2004), p. 4.
  32. ^ Spence (1996), pp. 97-99.
  33. ^ Michael (1966), p. 35.
  34. ^ Reilly (2011), pp. 44–45.
  35. ^ Perry (1982).
  36. ^ Perry (1982), p. 348, 350.
  37. ^ Jump up to:a b Reilly (2004), p. 139.
  38. ^ Michael (1966), p. 93.
  39. ^ Jump up to:a b Maochun Yu, "The Taiping Rebellion: A Military Assessment of Revolution and Counterrevolution", printed in A Military History of China 138 (David A. Graff & Robin Higham eds., 2002)
  40. ^ Michael (1966), pp. 94–95.
  41. ^ Spence (1996), pp. 237, 242–244.
  42. ^ Jump up to:a b Spence (1996), p. 244.
  43. ^ Elleman.
  44. ^ Elleman, p. 52.
  45. ^ Richard J. Smith, Mercenaries and Mandarins: The Ever-Victorious Army in Nineteenth Century China (Millwood, New York: KTO Press, 1978),passim.
  46. ^ Tucker, Spencer C. (2017). The roots and consequences of civil wars and revolutions: conflicts that changed world history. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO. p. 229. ISBN 978-1-4408-4294-8. OCLC 956379787.
  47. ^ Glenn S. (March 15, 2012). "ฮ่อ Haaw". Royal Institute – 1982. Thai-language.com. Archived from the original (Dictionary) on May 1, 2012. Retrieved April 5, 2012.
  48. ^ "Taiping Rebellion", Britannica Concise
  49. ^ "Necrometrics". Nineteenth Century Death Tolls cites a number of sources, some of which are reliable.
  50. ^ Jump up to:a b Spence (1996), p. [page needed].
  51. ^ Jump up to:a b Platt (2012), p. [page needed].
  52. ^ 王新龙 (2013). 大清王朝4. 青苹果数据中心.
  53. ^ Li, Xiaobing (2012). China at War: An Encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO. p. 415. ISBN 978-1-59884-415-3.
  54. ^ Michael Dillon (1999). China's Muslim Hui community: migration, settlement and sects. Richmond: Curzon Press. p. 59. ISBN 0-7007-1026-4. Retrieved 2010-06-28.
  55. ^ David G. Atwill (2005). The Chinese sultanate: Islam, ethnicity, and the Panthay Rebellion in southwest China, 1856–1873. Stanford University Press. p. 139. ISBN 0-8047-5159-5. Retrieved 2010-06-28.
  56. ^ Chinese studies in philosophy, Volume 28. M. E. Sharpe. 1997. p. 67. Retrieved 2010-06-28.
  57. ^ Albert Fytche (1878). Burma past and present. C. K. Paul & Co. p. 300. Retrieved 2010-06-28. joined by hill tribes of shans.
  58. ^ Garnaut, Anthony. "From Yunnan to Xinjiang:Governor Yang Zengxin and his Dungan Generals" (PDF). Pacific and Asian History, Australian National University. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-03-09. Retrieved 2010-07-14. p. 98
  59. ^ Lipman (1998), pp. 120–121.
  60. ^ Gibb, H. A. R. (1954). Encyclopedia of Islam, Volumes 1–5. Brill Archive. p. 849. ISBN 90-04-07164-4. Retrieved 2011-03-26.
  61. ^ Spence (1999), p. 176.
  62. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Wagner, Rudolf G. (2008-11-10). "Taiping Rebellion". Brill's Encyclopedia of China.
  63. ^ Tarocco, Francesca (2007), The Cultural Practices of Modern Chinese Buddhism: Attuning the Dharma, London: Routledge, p. 48, ISBN 978-1-136-75439-5.
  64. ^ Reilly (2011), p. 138-141.
  65. ^ Jump up to:a b Spence (1996), chapter 16.
  66. ^ Spence (1996), chapter 21.
  67. ^ Spence (1996), chapter 22.
  68. ^ Ramsey, Robert, S. (1987). The Languages of China. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. pp. 167, 232–236. ISBN 0-691-06694-9.
  69. ^ J. Chappell (2018). Some Corner of a Chinese Field: The politics of remembering foreign veterans of the Taiping civil war. Modern Asian Studies, 1–38. doi:10.1017/S0026749X16000986
  70. ^ Michael (1966), p. [page needed].
  71. ^ Deng, Kent G. (2011) "China's Political Economy in Modern Times: Changes and Economic Consequences, 1800–2000". Routledge, Business & Economies. 320 pages
  72. ^ Heath (1994), p. 11.
  73. ^ Heath (1994), pp. 13–14.
  74. ^ Jump up to:a b c Heath (1994), p. 16.
  75. ^ Heath (1994), p. 33.
  76. ^ Spence (1996), chapter 13.
  77. ^ Reilly (2011), p. 139.
  78. ^ Matthew White (2011). Atrocities: The 100 Deadliest Episodes in Human History. W. W. Norton. p. 289. ISBN 978-0-393-08192-3.
  79. ^ Micheal Clodfelter (2002). Warfare and Armed Conflicts: A Statistical Reference to Casualty and Other Figures. Mcfarland. p. 256. ISBN 978-0-7864-1204-4.
  80. ^ Ho Ping-ti. STUDIES ON THE POPULATION OF CHINA, 1368–1953. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1959. p. 237
  81. ^ The Hakka Odyssey & their Taiwan homeland – Page 120 Clyde Kiang – 1992
  82. ^ Purcell, Victor. CHINA. London: Ernest Benn, 1962. p. 167
  83. ^ Quoted in Purcell, Victor. CHINA. London: Ernest Benn, 1962. p. 239.
  84. ^ Chesneaux, Jean. PEASANT REVOLTS IN CHINA, 1840–1949. Translated by C. A. Curwen. New York: W. W. Norton, 1973. p. 40
  85. ^ Pelissier, Roger. THE AWAKENING OF CHINA: 1793–1949. Edited and Translated by Martin Kieffer. New York: Putnam, 1967. p. 109
  86. ^ Purcell, Victor. CHINA. London: Ernest Benn, 1962. p. 168
  87. ^ Jian Youwen (1973), p. 8.
  88. ^ Franz H. Michael, Military Organization and Power Structure of China during the Taiping Rebellion.
  89. ^ David Strand, and Ming K. Chan, "Militarism and Militarization in Modern Chinese History". Trends in History 2.2 (1981): 53–69.
  90. ^ Jian Youwen (1973), p. 9.
  91. ^ Daniel Little (2009). "Marx and the Taipings". Retrieved 23 December 2012.
  92. ^ Jump up to:a b Rowe, William T. (2012). China's Last Empire: The Great Qing. ISBN 978-0-674-06624-3.
  93. ^ "The Jen Yu-wen Collection on the Taiping Revolutionary Movement". The Yale University Library Gazette. 49 (3): 293–296. January 1975.
  94. ^ John King Fairbank, et al. East Asia: The modern transformation (1965) 2:162.
  95. ^ Kirkus (1983), "Mandarin, by Robert S. Elegant", Kirkus
  96. ^ Li Bo Tienkuo: The Heavenly Kingdom ISBN 1-5426-6057-2
  97. ^ Jump up to:a b c Teng, Yuan Chung (1963). "Reverend Issachar Jacox Roberts and the Taiping Rebellion". The Journal of Asian Studies. 23 (1): 55–67. doi:10.2307/2050633. ISSN 0021-9118. JSTOR 2050633.
  98. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Clarke, Prescott; Gregory (1982). Western reports on the Taiping : a selection of documents. Canberra: Australian National University Press. p. 118.
  99. ^ Jump up to:a b c Boardman, Eugene P. (1951). "Christian Influence Upon the Ideology of the Taiping Rebellion". The Far Eastern Quarterly. 10 (2): 115–124. doi:10.2307/2049091. ISSN 0363-6917. JSTOR 2049091.
  100. ^ "A letter from Dr D B McCartee". Western reports on the Taiping: a selection of documents. Clarke, 1982.
  101. ^ Jump up to:a b "A Report by R. J. Forest". Western reports on the Taiping: A selection of documents. Clarke, 1982.
  102. ^ "OUR CHINA CORRESPONDENCE.; Affairs at Ningpo Admiral Hope Finds Fault with the Rebels Proceedings of the Insurrectionists Distress at Shanghai How Foreigners are to be Protected". The New York Times. March 29, 1862. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved March 1, 2021.

Sources

Modern Monographs and Surveys

  • Heath, Ian (1994). The Taiping Rebellion, 1851–1866. Osprey Military Men-at-Arms Series. London; Long Island City: Osprey. ISBN 1-85532-346-X. Emphasis on the military history.
  • Jian Youwen (1973). The Taiping Revolutionary Movement. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN 0-300-01542-9. Translated and condensed from the author's publications in Chinese; especially strong on the military campaigns, based on the author's wide travels in China in the 1920s and 1930s.
  • Kilcourse, Carl S. (2016). Taiping Theology: The Localization of Christianity in China, 1843–64. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-1-137-53728-7.
  • Meyer-Fong, Tobie S. (2013). What Remains: Coming to Terms with Civil War in 19th Century China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. ISBN 978-0-8047-5425-5. A study of the victims, their experience of the war, and the memorializationof the war.
  • Osterhammel, Jürgen (2015). The Transformation of the World: A Global History of the Nineteenth Century. Translated by Patrick Camiller. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-16980-4.
  • Platt, Stephen R. (2012). Autumn in the Heavenly Kingdom: China, the West, and the Epic Story of the Taiping Civil War. New York: Knopf. ISBN 978-0-307-27173-0. Detailed narrative analysis.
  • Reilly, Thomas H. (2004). The Taiping Heavenly Kingdom: Rebellion and the Blasphemy of Empire. Seattle: University of Washington Press. ISBN 0-295-98430-9. Focuses on the religious basis of the rebellion.
  • Reilly, Thomas H. (2011). The Taiping Heavenly Kingdom: Rebellion and the Blasphemy of Empire. Seattle: University of Washington Press. ISBN 978-0-295-80192-6.
  • Spence, Jonathan D. (1996). God's Chinese Son: The Taiping Heavenly Kingdom of Hong Xiuquan. New York: W.W. Norton. ISBN 0-393-03844-0.
  • Spence, Jonathan D. (1999). The Search for Modern China. New York: Norton. ISBN 9780393973518. Standard textbook.

Scholarly Articles

  • Perry, Elizabeth J. (1982). "Taipings and Triads: The Role of Religion in Inter-rebel Relations". In Bak, János M.; Benecke, Gerhard (eds.). Religion and Rural Revolt: Papers Presented to the Fourth Interdisciplinary Workshop on Peasant Studies, University of British Columbia, 1982. Manchester: Manchester University Press. pp. 342–353. ISBN 0-7190-0990-1.

Primary sources[edit]

  • Michael, Franz H. (1966), The Taiping Rebellion: History and Documents, Seattle: University of Washington Press. 3 vols. Volumes two and three select and translate basic documents.

Further reading

Modern monographs and surveys

  • Caleb Carr, The Devil Soldier: The Story of Frederick Townsend Ward (1994) ISBN 0-679-41114-3.
  • Carl J. Danko, Foreign Devils and God-Worshipers: Western Mercenaries and Cross-Cultural Realism During the Taiping Rebellion (Army Command And General Staff College, 2017) online
  • John King Fairbank, et al. East Asia: The modern transformation (1965) 2:155–178. online
  • Jack Gray, Rebellions and Revolutions: China from the 1800s to the 1980s (1990), ISBN 0-19-821576-2
  • Immanuel C. Y. Hsu, The Rise of Modern China (1999), ISBN 0-19-512504-5. Standard textbook; online
  • Philip A. Kuhn, Rebellion and Its Enemies in Late Imperial China; Militarization and Social Structure, 1796–1864 (Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press, 1970). Influential analysis of the rise of rebellion and the organization of its suppression. online
  • Philip A. Kuhn, "The Taiping Rebellion," in John K. Fairbank, ed., Cambridge History of China Vol Ten Pt One (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press, 1970): 264–317.
  • Rudolf G. Wagner. Reenacting the Heavenly Vision: The Role of Religion in the Taiping Rebellion. (Berkeley: Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California, Berkeley, China Research Monograph 25, 1982). ISBN 0-912966-60-2.
  • Mary Clabaugh Wright. The Last Stand of Chinese Conservatism: The T'ung-Chih Restoration, 1862–1874. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1957; rpr. 1974 ISBN 0-8047-0476-7. Account of the Han Chinese/ Manchu coalition which revived the dynasty and defeated the Taipings.

Scholarly Articles

  • Chappell, Jonathan (2016). "The limits of the Shanghai bridgehead: understanding British intervention in the Taiping rebellion 1860–62" (PDF). Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History. 44 (4): 533–550. doi:10.1080/03086534.2016.1210251.
  • Huan, J. I. N. (2017). "In Search of a Chinese Utopia: The Taiping Rebellion as a Literary Event". A New Literary History of Modern China. Harvard University Press.
  • Kuhn, Philip A. (July 1977). "Origins of the Taiping Vision: Cross-Cultural Dimensions of a Chinese Rebellion". Comparative Studies in Society and History. 9(3): 350–366. doi:10.1017/S0010417500008756. JSTOR 177996.
  • Levenson, Joseph R. (1962). "Confucian and Taiping "Heaven": The Political Implications of Clashing Religious Concepts". Comparative Studies in Society and History. 4 (4): 436–453. doi:10.1017/S0010417500001390. JSTOR 177693.
  • Michael, Franz H. (November 1949). "Military Organization and Power Structure of China during the Taiping Rebellion". Pacific Historical Review. 18 (4): 469–483. doi:10.2307/3635664. JSTOR 3635664.
  • Zheng, Xiaowei (2018). "The Literary Turn: An Introduction of the Special Issue on Ways of Writing the Taiping Civil War". Frontiers of History in China. 13 (2): 167–172.

Fiction

  • Chin, Shunshin (2001). The Taiping Rebellion. Translated by Joshua A. Fogel. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe. ISBN 0-7656-0100-1.
  • Hosea Ballou Morse, In the Days of the Taipings, Being the Recollections of Ting Kienchang, Otherwise Meisun, Sometime Scoutmaster and Captain in the Ever-Victorious Army and Interpreter-in-Chief to General Ward and General Gordon(Salem, MA: The Essex institute, 1927; Reprinted: San Francisco: Chinese Materials Center, 1974).
  • George MacDonald Fraser. Flashman and the Dragon. New York: Knopf, 1986. ISBN 0-394-55357-8. A volume in The Flashman Papers series.

Contemporaneous Accounts

  • Lindley, Augustus (1970) [1866]. Ti-ping Tien-Kwoh: The History of the Ti-Ping Revolution. OCLC 3467844.
  • Xiucheng, Li (1970). The Autobiography of the Chung-Wang (Confession of the Loyal Prince). Translated by Lay, W.T. ISBN 978-0-275-02723-0.
  • Thomas Taylor Meadows, The Chinese and Their Rebellions, Viewed in Connection with Their National Philosophy, Ethics, Legislation, and Administration. To Which Is Added, an Essay on Civilization and Its Present State in the East and West. (London: Smith, Elder; Bombay: Smith, Taylor, 1856). American Libraries eBook text
  • Brine, Lindesay, The Taeping rebellion in China (London: J. Murray, 1862)
  • Ven. Archdeacon Moule, Personal Recollections of the T'ai-p'ing Rebellion 1861–63(Shanghai: Printed at the "Celestial Empire" Office 1884).

External links

Library resources about
Taiping Rebellion

  • Resources in your library
  • Resources in other libraries
  • Taiping Rebellion Videos – Chronological presentation of the Taiping Rebellion, with details and anecdotes.
  • Taiping Rebellion.com – Narrative history, with many illustrations, a Timeline, and a detailed Map of the Rebellion.
  • The Taiping Rebellion – BBC discussion with Rana Mitter, University of Oxford; Frances Wood British Library; and Julia Lovell, University of London.


hide
  • v
  • t
  • e
Qing dynasty topics
History
Early
(1616–1683)
  • Jurchen unification
  • Later Jin
  • Seven Grievances
  • Later Jin invasion of Joseon
  • Qing invasion of Joseon
  • Transition from Ming to Qing 
    • Battle of Shanhai Pass
  • Great Clearance
  • Revolt of the Three Feudatories
High Qing
(1683–1839)
  • Sino-Russian border conflicts
  • Dzungar–Qing Wars
  • Chinese expedition to Tibet (1720)
  • Chinese Rites controversy
  • Ten Great Campaigns
  • Miao Rebellion (1735–36)
  • Lhasa riot of 1750
  • Revolt of the Altishahr Khojas
  • Āfāqī Khoja Holy War
  • Sino-Burmese War (1765–1769)
  • Lin Shuangwen rebellion
  • Battle of Ngọc Hồi-Đống Đa
  • Sino-Nepalese War
  • Miao Rebellion (1795–1806)
  • White Lotus Rebellion
Late
(1840–1912)
  • First Opium War
  • Dogra–Tibetan War (Sino-Sikh War)
  • Taiping Rebellion
  • Nian Rebellion
  • Red Turban Rebellion (1854–1856)
  • Small Swords Society
  • Miao Rebellion (1854–1873)
  • Nepalese–Tibetan War
  • Panthay Rebellion
  • Second Opium War
  • Punti–Hakka Clan Wars
  • Amur Acquisition
  • Self-Strengthening Movement
  • Tongzhi Restoration
  • Dungan Revolt (1862–1877)
  • Mudan incident
  • Tianjin Massacre
  • Margary Affair
  • Japanese invasion of Taiwan (1874)
  • Northern Chinese Famine
  • Qing reconquest of Xinjiang
  • Sino-French War
  • Sikkim expedition
  • Jindandao incident
  • First Sino-Japanese War
  • Gongche Shangshu movement
  • Dungan revolt (1895–96)
  • Hundred Days' Reform
  • Third plague pandemic
  • Boxer Rebellion 
    • Red Lanterns
  • Eight-Nation Alliance 
    • Declaration of war
  • Late Qing reforms
  • British expedition to Tibet
  • 1905 Batang uprising
  • 1909 Provincial Assembly elections
  • Chinese expedition to Tibet (1910)
  • Manchurian plague
  • Railway Protection Movement
  • 1911 Revolution 
    • Wuchang Uprising
    • Xinhai Lhasa turmoil
    • Mongolian Revolution of 1911
    • Xinhai Revolution in Xinjiang
    • Imperial Edict of the Abdication of Puyi
  • Manchu Restoration
Government
  • Emperor 
    • List
    • Family tree
  • Amban
  • Cup of Solid Gold
  • Deliberative Council
  • Flag of the Qing dynasty
  • Grand Council
  • Great Qing Legal Code
  • Imperial Clan Court
  • Imperial Commissioner
  • Imperial Household Department
  • Lifan Yuan
  • Ministry of Posts and Communications
  • Nine Gates Infantry Commander
  • Provincial governor
  • Provincial military commander
  • Principles of the Constitution (1908)
  • Royal and noble ranks of the Qing dynasty
  • Ta-Ching Government Bank
  • Viceroys 
    • Zhili
    • Shaan-Gan
    • Liangjiang
    • Huguang
    • Sichuan
    • Min-Zhe
    • Liangguang
    • Yun-Gui
    • Three Northeast Provinces
  • Zongli Yamen
Military
  • Military of the Qing dynasty
  • Beiyang Army
  • Chu Army
  • Eight Banners
  • Ever Victorious Army
  • Green Standard Army
  • Huai Army
  • Hushenying
  • Imperial Guards
  • New Army
  • Peking Field Force
  • Shuishiying
  • Wuwei Corps
  • Xiang Army
Special regions
  • Qing dynasty in Inner Asia
  • Manchuria under Qing rule
  • Mongolia under Qing rule 
    • Administrative divisions
  • Tibet under Qing rule 
    • Golden Urn
    • List of imperial residents
  • Xinjiang under Qing rule 
    • General of Ili
  • Taiwan under Qing rule 
    • Provincial Administration Hall
Palaces &
mausoleums
  • Chengde Mountain Resort
  • Forbidden City
  • Mukden Palace
  • Old Summer Palace
  • Summer Palace
  • Eastern Qing tombs
  • Fuling Mausoleum
  • Zhao Mausoleum (Qing dynasty)
  • Imperial Tombs of the Ming and Qing Dynasties
  • Western Qing tombs
Society &
culture
  • Booi Aha
  • Changzhou School of Thought
  • Dibao
  • Four Wangs
  • Gujin Tushu Jicheng
  • History of Ming
  • Islam during the Qing dynasty
  • Kangxi Dictionary
  • Kaozheng
  • Literary inquisition
  • Manchu Han Imperial Feast
  • Peiwen Yunfu
  • Pentaglot Dictionary
  • Qing official headwear
  • Qing poetry
  • Quan Tangshi
  • Queue
  • Researches on Manchu Origins
  • Sacred Edict of the Kangxi Emperor
  • Shamanism in the Qing dynasty
  • Siku Quanshu 
    • Zongmu Tiyao
Treaties
  • Treaty of Kyakhta (1727)
  • Treaty of Nerchinsk
  • Unequal treaty 
    • Boxer Protocol
    • Burlingame Treaty
    • Chefoo Convention
    • Convention Between Great Britain and China Respecting Tibet
    • Convention for the Extension of Hong Kong Territory
    • Convention of Peking
    • Convention of Tientsin
    • Li–Lobanov Treaty
    • Sino-Portuguese Treaty of Peking
    • Treaty of Aigun
    • Treaty of the Bogue
    • Treaty of Canton
    • Treaty of Kulja
    • Treaty of Nanking
    • Treaty of Saint Petersburg (1881)
    • Treaty of Shimonoseki
    • Treaty of Tarbagatai
    • Treaty of Tientsin
    • Treaty of Wanghia
    • Treaty of Whampoa
Currency
Coinage
  • Zhiqian
  • Kangxi Tongbao
  • Qianlong Tongbao
  • Hongqian
  • Da-Qing Tongbi
  • Da-Qing Jinbi
Paper money
  • Da-Qing Baochao
  • Hubu Guanpiao
  • Banknotes of the Ta-Ching Government Bank
Other topics
  • Aisin Gioro
  • Anti-Qing sentiment
  • Canton System
  • Chuang Guandong
  • Draft History of Qing
  • Imperial hunt of the Qing dynasty
  • Manchu people
  • Names of the Qing dynasty
  • New Qing History
  • Qing conquest theory
  • Timeline of late anti-Qing rebellions
  • Treaty ports
  • Willow Palisade
hide
  • v
  • t
  • e
Taiping Rebellion
Battles and campaigns
  • Jintian
  • Changsha
  • Wuchang
  • 1st Nanjing
  • Western Expedition
  • Northern Expedition
  • Eastern Expedition
  • 1st Jiangnan
  • Tianjing incident
  • Sanhe
  • 2nd Jiangnan
  • Ningbo
  • Anqing
  • Shanghai
  • Guanzhong
  • Cixi
  • Changzhou
  • 3rd Nanking
  • Hubei
  • Fujian
Taiping Heavenly Kingdom leaders
  • Hong Xiuquan
  • Hong Tianguifu Executed
  • Hong Xuanjiao
  • Yang Xiuqing †
  • Feng Yunshan †
  • Xiao Chaogui †
  • Wei Changhui †
  • Hong Rengan Executed
  • Shi Dakai Executed
  • Li Xiucheng Executed
  • Chen Yucheng Executed
  • Li Shixian †
  • Qin Rigang Executed
  • Co-Commanders:
  • Zhang Lexing † (Nian Rebels)
  • Su Sanniang
  • Qiu Ersao † (Red Turban rebels)
Qing dynasty leaders and personnel
  • Xianfeng Emperor
  • Empress Dowager Cixi
  • Zeng Guofan
  • Sengge Rinchen
  • Guanwen
  • Li Hongzhang
  • Luo Bingzhang
  • Jirhangga †
  • Zuo Zongtang
  • Zhang Guoliang †
  • He Chun †
  • Xiang Rong †
  • Frederick Townsend Ward †
  • Second French Empire Auguste Protet †
Other notable figures
  • Fu Shanxiang
  • Hu Jiumei
  • Yang Fuqing †
Miscellaneous topics
  • Noble ranks
See also:
Authority control: National libraries Edit this at Wikidata
  • United States
Categories: 
  • Taiping Rebellion
  • 1850 in China
  • 1851 in China
  • 1852 in China
  • 1853 in China
  • 1854 in China
  • 1855 in China
  • 1856 in China
  • 1857 in China
  • 1858 in China
  • 1859 in China
  • 1860 in China
  • 1861 in China
  • 1862 in China
  • 1863 in China
  • 1864 in China
  • 19th century in China
  • 19th-century rebellions
  • Taiping Heavenly Kingdom
  • Peasant revolts
  • Persecution of Buddhists
  • Rebellions in the Qing dynasty
  • Religion-based civil wars
  • Wars involving France
  • Wars involving the Qing dynasty
  • Wars involving the United Kingdom
  • Christianity in China
  • Christianization
  • Eight Banners

Navigation menu


  • This page was last edited on 23 June 2021, at 10:15 (UTC)

Posted by Vasundhra at 8:26 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: CHINA, CHINA HISTORY, CHINA REBELLIONS, CHINA WARS

Wednesday, July 7, 2021

AFGHANISTAN : The Afghan Endgame: The US Retreats, Taliban Returns

 SOURCE :

 The Afghan endgame: The US retreats, Taliban returns (msn.com)

PEACE HAS NO CHANCE IN AFGHANISTAN

The Afghan Endgame: The US Retreats, Taliban Returns

                           


PRELUDES TO CIVIL WAR IN AFGHANISTAN & BLOOD SHED IN JAMMU AND KASHMIR OF INDIA- PAKISTAN


The US presence in this latest war brought about a modicum of stability beginning in 2001 but at a heavy cost (AFP)

With the last batch of American soldiers returning home from Bagram Air Base, once the symbol of the United States (US)’s presence in Afghanistan, on July 2, the longest war in the America’s history is drawing to an end. However, around 650 soldiers will stay back with the limited mission of protecting the US embassy and Kabul’s international airport.

In order to allay fears that the US is abandoning Afghanistan, President Joe Biden hosted an Oval Office meeting on June 25 with Afghan President Ashraf Ghani and Chairman of the High Council for National Reconciliation, Abdullah Abdullah.

While Biden’s conversation may have been reassuring for the two beleaguered Afghan leaders, most people knew that it could well be the last time a US president would be hosting a pro-American Afghan president at the White House.

Afghanistan’s situation today is precarious. The Taliban, already in the country, assisted by those streaming in from Pakistan, have captured broad swathes of territory with little resistance from Afghan government troops. On the weekend after President Biden’s announcement, the Taliban swept through a series of districts in northern Afghanistan and more than 1,000 Afghan government troops fled across the border.

Some intelligence reports now predict a Taliban takeover of Afghanistan within six months to two years ( ? ) of the US departure. The consequences of this could be disastrous for the people of Afghanistan and peace in the region.

Under Taliban rule, many of the gains made during the past two decades, especially in the areas of literacy and women’s empowerment, might be wiped away. It is also questionable whether the Taliban will deliver on the counterterrorism guarantees it has made.

Why is this turnaround on Afghanistan taking place? The primary reasons include the US mindset on Afghanistan, the positions of the players in the region, and the nature of Afghanistan itself.

The US entered Afghanistan after 9/11 to destroy the Taliban and in pursuit of Osama bin Laden. Outside of that primary purpose, the mission has been extremely muddled and increasingly expensive in terms of money and lives. It has claimed 2,400 American troops and 3,800 private soldiers employed by the US military, with costs running into billions of dollars.

Whatever domestic support was there to begin with for the war, has shrunk over time with the majority of Americans today opposed to US involvement in Afghanistan. President Barack Obama reduced troop presence considerably between 2012 and 2016. President Donald Trump announced a full pull out by May 1, 2021, if the Taliban met the commitments it made in the Agreement for Bringing Peace to Afghanistan on February 29, 2020. President Biden sealed the deal by beating the September 11, 2021, deadline that he had set for withdrawal.

Nations in the region and those invested or interested in Afghanistan have seen the writing on the wall regarding its future.

New Delhi, which has long been a significant player in Afghanistan, has been preparing for the US withdrawal and the potential fall of Kabul. Many have linked the Indian government’s recent talks with Kashmiri leaders to the US withdrawal and a potential return of the Taliban to Kabul.

India is not the only country in the region concerned about the Taliban’s rise. Iran, China, Russia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and the Gulf states, some of which bankrolled the Afghan mujahideen fighting the Soviet occupation in the 1980s, all have skin in the Afghan game. Like India, it is reported that Russia, Iran, China and others have held negotiations with the Taliban.

One country, as before, will play an outsized role in relations with Afghanistan going forward and that is its neighbour and long time benefactor of the Taliban, Pakistan. Islamabad’s influence on the Taliban may have dwindled over the decades, but Pakistan is thought to still hold considerable sway over the militia.

Afghanistan has been in an almost endless state of conflict and civil war since 1978. The US presence in this latest war brought about a modicum of stability beginning in 2001 but at a heavy cost. Over the past two decades, more than 66,000 Afghan soldiers and 100,000 civilians have died, and over 2.7 million rendered homeless.

There is no simple answer to what lies ahead. It appears likely, however, that in the near-term, the Taliban will gain control of much of the country, except for Kabul which is well-fortified and protected by the US and a selected international presence. However, the US embassy in Kabul already has an “emergency action plan” in place and arrangements are being made for the evacuation of thousands of Afghan interpreters who assisted the US during this war.

The Taliban has been emboldened by the American withdrawal and the prospects for a negotiated peace for Afghanistan have grown exceedingly dim.

In spite of this, it should be remembered that hope dies last. Peace talks must be pursued. Peace must be given a chance. It is the last and best hope for Afghanistan and its beleaguered people.

Frank F Islam is an entrepreneur, civic leader, and thought leader based in Washington DC


The Afghan endgame: The US retreats, Taliban returns 

& 

PEACE HAS NO CHANCE IN AFGHANISTAN

Posted by Vasundhra at 8:45 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

Sunday, July 4, 2021

MODERNIZATION OF ARMED FORCES : Pearls of Wisdom on Air Power as Enunciated

SOURCE:

 (a)  https://frontierindia.com/pearls-of-wisdom-on-air-power-as-enunciated-by-circumstantial-cds-general-bipin-rawat/

  (b)  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwhbsvN9o_I 

 (c)  https://youtu.be/7timgL3mEa4



VIDEO NO 1/2

#CDSGenBipinRawat #TheatreCommand #IndianArmy #IndiaToday

Chief Of Defence Staff General Bipin Rawat spoke exclusively to India Today and talked about the Integrated Theatre Command System and recent drone attacks in Jammu IAF.


       VIDEO No 1/2  CLICK TO OPEN.......................HERE


                             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


VIDEO NO 2/2

#Bhadauria #AirChief #IndiaToday

Global Defence Summit: IAF Chief RKS Bhadauria Talks About New Assets And Capabilities Of Air Force


     VIDEO No 2/2  CLICK TO OPEN......................HERE

==============================



Pearls of Wisdom on Air Power
as Enunciated
by
‘Circumstantial’ CDS,General Bipin Rawat

Arrogance and ignorance combination makes a heady cocktail.


On hearing the pearls of wisdom spread by Bipin Rawat on the issue of his understanding of Air Power during an interview on the issue of impending creation of Theatre Commands by Gaurav Sawant for India Today TV Channel on 2nd July, 2021 reminded me of General Yahya Khan and Iraqi President Saddam Hussein.

May I be explicit; I have no intention of expressing my disrespect either to General Yahya Khan or President Saddam Hussein, both of whom are now deceased and were heads of state of respective countries. I do not wish to compare them, status wise, with a secretary level officer of Government of India. It is their utterly flawed collective understanding of use/employment of Air Power that makes them comparable with one another.

General Yahya Khan
Seeds of creation of Bangla Desh were sown not only due to Sheikh Mujib winning elections followed by butchering of Bengalis but also due to a monumental strategic blunder committed by General Yahya Khan in deciding to withdraw nearly all Air Power elements from erstwhile East Pakistan, specially fighters, the famous F-86 Sabre Jets. As per PAF ORBAT document of 1971 vintage in Air Force Station, Kalaikunda, FOUR F-86 SQUADRONS WERE BASED IN EAST PAKISTAN AS ON MARCH 1971. General Yahya ordered entire fighter fleet to move to West Pakistan. Whatever remained was destroyed by IAF fighters. Famous encounter of FOUR F-86 vs FOUR IAF GNATS on 22nd November, 1971 clinched the issue in favour of IAF conclusively, when THREE OUT OF FOUR SABRES WERE SHOT DOWN AND FOURTH WAS HIT BUT GOT AWAY. Total absence of Enemy Air Power enabled IAF, IN and Indian Army to operate with impunity under „gifted‟ AIR SUPERIORITY CONDITIONS. As a professional I must add; Air Superiority over erstwhile East Pakistan during 1971 Indo-Pak war was not achieved entirely by IAF actions. It was a „GIFT‟ by General Yahya Khan, who did not know about „A‟ of Air Power, having been a land lubber all his life. Had PAF strike elements been available in the east, there may not have been successful TANGAIL DROP and MEGHNA RIVER CROSSING MISSIONS of Indian Army elements. Pakistan did not have to defeat Mukti Vahini and Indian Military combined onslaught; it had to merely extend the war duration to enable third party intervention. Pak failed to extend the war duration because of absence of Air Power. Rest, as is said, is history. Presence of US Navy VIIth Fleet in neighbourhood made no difference.

President Saddam Hussein

During Operation Desert Storm I, President Saddam ordered most of Iraqi Air Force elements, fighters in particular, to move to safe sanctuaries in Iran. Had President Saddam allowed formidable strike elements to at least attempt a retaliatory strike on one of the seven Aircraft Carriers even by flying a ONE WAY MISSION, combined land based elements of MNF and carrier borne elements of US Navy would not have accomplished, what they did/could.

In both above cases decision makers, the proverbial land lubbers, had no clue about Air Power employment and its ability to alter/decide the outcome of war by remaining a threat in being and operating independently.
Bipin Rawat is no different. He does not understand „A‟ of Air Power as is evident by his ignorant utterances during the interview.

1. Bipin Rawat said; I quote “Air Defence Command is being created to control everything that flies in the air, be it aircraft, missile or an artillery shell-----“ Unquote. 

 Dear Bipin you have no clue of Air Defence. You are mixing up ‘Coordination of Fire Control’ with Air Defence. Your flawed understanding that by setting up AD Command, there would be no fratricide indicates your total ignorance of dynamics of how an air defence scenario evolves within seconds with rapidly changing situation. Fratricide is an integral part of war; it can be minimized not eliminated. Your mention of Heptr shooting (without saying so in as many words) indicates your total lack of understanding/knowledge of rules of engagement with a developing threat defined by a mere blip on radar scope.


2. Bipin Rawat said; I quote “ Air Force is a supporting service viz Artillery and Engineers-------“
Dear Bipin, I actually feel ashamed that both you and I are product of same
establishment. Your views calling sister service as support service thus comparing IAF with support services of Army borders on professional insanity and lack of professional integrity. In any case let me express my indignation with Army philosophy of categorizing soldiers as ‘ARMS’ and ‘SERVICES’. You can continue with that in the Army. In IAFeveryone is a soldier of only one category. It is this jaundiced mindset that enables youto address a sister service with such derogatory reference. I can only pity you

3. Bipin Rawat said on KRC Report; Creation of CDS; 20 years delay. 

Dear Bipin by making such irresponsible statement you have called the previous governments and more importantly your professional parents, the former Service Chiefs during that period as incompetent, unprofessional and irresponsible for delaying creation of Chief of Defence Staff. In fact it was their collective wisdom, which ensured that the unwanted, unwarranted appointment of Chief of Defence Staff did not emerge. Does it not concern you that KRC did not have an IAF/IN member? As an honest professional of unquestionable professional integrity, it should!

4. Bipin Rawat answered when the anchor asked “Why the hurry to meet deadlines”

Dear Bipin, your answer to the above question would be fit to be classified as the vaguest answer by a „supposed‟ professional on a highly important strategic issue as to what was the need to alter the time tested and war proven Indian Military structure of Regional Command. If my memory Serves me right, the last regional command of Indian Military was SOUTH WESTERN ARMY COMMAND around 15 years back, which is after KRC report was submitted. Are you trying to call the then government, COAS and other decision making functionaries, who decided to create an An Army Regional Command as late as 2005-6 as incompetent? Did you have professional and moral courage to express a contrarion view in Writing to powers that be? If not why not? Scared to miss the next rank!

5. Announcement of Creation of Theatre Commands. A sound, matured and professionally competent leader would have first discussed the issue with three Service Chiefs in private, arrived at a consensus and then announced the proposed change. It is your crowning failure of leadership, which has resulted in full blown controversy appearing in public domain. Your arrogance has caused immeasurable damage to inter service harmony prevailing. What is worse is general public laughing all the way after witnessing in fighting within services caused by your intemperate attitude. You have failed miserably.

6. You are yet to answer few elementary questions posed to you nearly two years back.When did any study ever recommend creation of Theatre Commands? KRC did not! Did you author a paper on the issue, duly circulated, vetted and approved or was it your reading of US Army précis. Do you know a fundamental difference between USA and India; USA does not have a single km of hostile border. India has more than 10,000 km of hostile/not so friendly borders.
Firstly, enumerate the specific incident/s under actual operational conditions wherein the existing command structure was found wanting for mounting an operation?

Secondly, enumerate explicitly the deficiencies in the existing set up.
Thirdly, how would creation of theatre command ensure that existing deficiencies would be eliminated?

Fourthly, is there a white paper enunciating the need for change from geographical commands to theatre commands?

Fifthly, would these proponents of ‘STRATEGIC REVERSE ENGINEERING’, explicitly state the gains that would accrue because of their irrational proposal to replace the existing geographical commands with Theatre Commands?

There are issues that did not feature during your interview. These are;

7. OROP. OROP issue ignited when former Military personnel decided to go on a
DHARNA. You were COAS. Before I go any further let me express and reiterate my view on OROP agitation, which is now more than 2000 days old. “The demand of former military personnel for OROP policy implementation as per Koshiyari Committee report duly approved by parliament is a perfectly legitimate demand. However deciding to agitate like trade unionist is an unbecoming conduct not expected from military personnel.” You have, however, neither mustered enough courage to face the soldiers you once commanded and convince them to abandon un-military like conduct of agitating as trade unionist nor convince the government to release OROP as recommended. You as COAS and now CDS have failed to break the OROP deadlock, your primary responsibility.

8. Inter-Service Exposure. From your numerous half baked utterances viz increasingretirement ages etc, it is quite evident that your knowledge of basics wrt HRmanagement is NIL. Usage of terms in respect of Air Force during interview viz „Air " Component Commander‟ etc is indicative of your almost NIL inter service exposure.Undergoing DSSC course and Higher Command course is not inter service exposure.Inter Service exposure implies having served with a different service formation and/or been on the teaching staff of defence institutions of higher learning viz DSSC/WAR COLLEGES.

We lost 1962 war due to failure of political leadership. We cannot afford to lose any future war because of an ignorant military leader. Please back off. It is still not too late to minimize/contain the damage to inter service harmony created by your senseless utterances to support an indefensible, unwanted and unwarranted proposal to create Theatre Commands. As the CDS you do not „own‟ Indian Military

Stay safe! God Bless! Gp Capt TP Srivastava 9818926254

Posted by Vasundhra at 8:39 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)
Chat Software

Search This Blog

Followers

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2025 (1)
    • ▼  January (1)
      • INDIA’S QUEST FOR AN INDIGENOUS NAVAL FIGHTER
  • ►  2024 (10)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (8)
  • ►  2023 (161)
    • ►  December (63)
    • ►  November (15)
    • ►  October (22)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (25)
    • ►  January (30)
  • ►  2022 (356)
    • ►  December (49)
    • ►  November (42)
    • ►  October (36)
    • ►  September (31)
    • ►  August (25)
    • ►  July (17)
    • ►  June (42)
    • ►  May (46)
    • ►  April (53)
    • ►  March (14)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2021 (66)
    • ►  October (7)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (33)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (12)
  • ►  2020 (186)
    • ►  December (12)
    • ►  November (19)
    • ►  October (15)
    • ►  September (15)
    • ►  August (26)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (31)
    • ►  March (43)
    • ►  February (12)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2019 (64)
    • ►  November (7)
    • ►  October (8)
    • ►  September (21)
    • ►  August (8)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (11)
  • ►  2018 (71)
    • ►  December (11)
    • ►  November (8)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (5)
    • ►  July (7)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (9)
    • ►  January (17)
  • ►  2017 (249)
    • ►  December (22)
    • ►  November (30)
    • ►  October (13)
    • ►  September (10)
    • ►  August (10)
    • ►  July (21)
    • ►  June (17)
    • ►  May (21)
    • ►  April (31)
    • ►  March (31)
    • ►  February (18)
    • ►  January (25)
  • ►  2016 (349)
    • ►  December (44)
    • ►  November (31)
    • ►  October (18)
    • ►  September (41)
    • ►  August (27)
    • ►  July (17)
    • ►  June (18)
    • ►  May (25)
    • ►  April (24)
    • ►  March (37)
    • ►  February (34)
    • ►  January (33)
  • ►  2015 (758)
    • ►  December (56)
    • ►  November (66)
    • ►  October (77)
    • ►  September (117)
    • ►  August (100)
    • ►  July (77)
    • ►  June (68)
    • ►  May (42)
    • ►  April (86)
    • ►  March (61)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2014 (22)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  May (1)
  • ►  2013 (14)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2012 (14)
    • ►  December (8)
    • ►  September (6)
Simple theme. Theme images by gaffera. Powered by Blogger.