Tuesday, September 1, 2015

OROP : WILL THE PRIME MINISTER ASK THE REAL ARUN JAITLEY TO PLEASE STAND UP ?

SOURCE:









WILL THE PRIME  MINISTER ASK THE REAL ARUN JAITLEY TO PLEASE STAND UP ?
                               BY
               RAM JETHMALANI​


MONDAY, 13 JULY 2015

 
Will the PM ask the real Arun Jaitley to                      please stand up?

 
My critics love to accuse me that whenever I criticise

                            Arun Jaitley for his

                     anti national activities,

I tend to sound very personal. Let me assure them and

my readers that I have no interest in Jaitley’s personal

life or any of his activities if they are confined to it. But

if his actions as a person, private or public, compromise

public good or our national interest, no force on earth

                             will keep me quiet.

 
 
I have written enough about how his actions as finance

minister have done  everything that is possible to 

ensure that  black money abroad  never returns to India.



 He has packed the Enforcement Directorate, who are

key to the SIT for Black Money, with persons of

questionable antecedents, many former henchmen of the

former Finance Minister, P Chidambaram, for whom he

has appeared as lawyer in the Fairfax case. And now the

appointment of the CVC, Mr. K V Chowdary, former

Chairman, Central Board of Direct Taxes

(under Chidambaram) for which Jaitley is reported to

have been present in the Selection Committee, (of which

he is not and was not member), only confirms in my mind

that his actions are anti national.



 Chowdary, the new CVC, against whom there are reams

of evidence of irregularity and impropriety, is many

shades worse than ‘tainted Thomas’ who appears so tame

now, whose selection by the previous Prime Minister

drew outrage in the nation. The Prime Minister is surely

aware that the highest flak he is receiving for anti-

national decisions, whether for the black money issue or

the selection of the tainted CVC, are all the result of the

public action of Arun Jaitley.


 And the question everyone is asking is how the Prime




Minister allowed all this to happen.


 
 
The Central Vigilance Commission is required to be an

office in combating corruption and he himself should be

possessed of unquestionable integrity. Holders of such

office have not to prove beyond reasonable doubt to

have this great qualification. This is required when a

person is to be convicted of crime and sentenced to

punishment prescribed by criminal law. I had four heavy

bundle of evidence of his complete unfitness for the

office of CVC yet the gentlemen was appointed after I

had sent one bundle to the Prime Minister and promised

to send 3 more without any delay. The Finance Minister’s

certificate of fitness proves nothing but it certainly

proves beyond doubt that Mr. Jaitley is not fit to be a

Finance Minister who is not even a member of Cabinet

Committee of Appointments. Yet he participated in the

process. It reflects on the Prime Minister too. I do not

wish to say more because the matter will be hopefully

thrashed out in courts of law or the Sovereign People of

India.



 
 
I was quite surprised to see an article in the May edition

of the Caravan magazine that does an in depth analysis of

Jaitley’s rise to power, how he managed always to step

higher, through a deliberate cultivation of the media, the

power brokers, corporate, the glitterati, and the

influence and power that he came to acquire over them,

officially and unofficially. Media moghuls, many of them

his good friends, refused to publish any information that

exposed or criticised his questionable, and sometimes

corrupt actions.



I give my highest compliments for Caravan magazine, for

their courageous piece “Talk of the Town”, despite the

facts they are writing forthrightly about not only the

present Minister for Information and Publicity, but also

the Finance Minister, with his intimidating outfit called

the Enforcement Directorate.

 
 
The article explains Arun Jaitley’s steady rise to the

commanding heights that we perceive today, beginning

from his student union days of 1974,


riding a well calculated, well orchestrated strategy right

from the start of net-working, disinformation and

manipulation, and befriending and controlling the media.


He realised the strategic necessity of befriending media

captains. He used the latter as his political career

progressed to stifle information about his murky side

in some of the prestigious Indian newspapers of some

extremely dubious legal opinions given regarding

allocation of coal blocs, a scam that the BJP was loudly

accusing the UPA Government of.





These facts were effectively obliterated from the

mainstream national media. So too, have his past

relations with Chidambaram and NDTV, with Vodaphone,

and Ketan Parekh who faced charges of defrauding the

Madhavpura Mercantile Cooperative Bank, been deleted

by mainstream media.



 
He also cultivated the right Delhi durbar style for building

up his social, corporate and media constituency, in lieu

of the political constituency that he so badly lacked, all

of it based on expediency to move on, and not ideology.

And with their support he appears to have become

master of the plantation industryfor planting stories and

entrenching disinformation about his political foes and

friends, and people whom he wanted to demolish.

Several leaks planted in media, that have tried to damage

reputation of many of his party colleagues are reportedly

traced to him.
 



According to the Caravan article, Jaitley appears to have

hobnobbed with every important politician of the

Congress, the BJP and other parties, and is a

pathological gossip and bad mouther, even of his

friends and political leaders, including Prime Minister

Vajpayee, and Advani, who has been his greatest

benefactor. He hobnobbed with the Judiciary as Law

Minister, misused his power, particularly regarding

appointment of judges, inspite of advice and opinions

from the IB.


 
 
His relationship with Narendra Modi seems interesting. To

begin with, both were trying to draw advantage from

each other’s strengths. Jaitley, a suave English speaking

Delhi durbari with no political base, but by now, with a

vast high society, business and media network; and Modi

with a vast political base, but no savvy, sophisticated

Delhi durbar. In the Vajpayee years, Jaitley had to play

second fiddle to Promod Mahajan, who was much higher

in the BJP pecking order, but after Mahajan’s death, he

found his great opportunity to rise within the party.

 
 
His elections from Amritsar was a disaster, but Modi

instead rewarded him and for whatever reason, placed

Defence and Finance in his control. His ironfist in velvet

glove romance with the press continues, more so, after

he was removed from Defence, and given the ministry of

Information and Broadcasting, where he can call the

shots with greater force to black our stories about his

own misdeeds.
 

 
I had warned Modi ji not to set him up as the party

candidate and I assured him that he will lose



. My advice was based on my belief shared by millions

that Jaitley

is a member of the notorious 160 club which

hoped and worked on the project of ensuring that BJP

does not get an absolute majority in Lok Sabha.


 
 
His role as President of Delhi and District Cricket

Association a post he is said to have headed for 13 years,

has brought to light by eminent veteran cricketers like

Bishen Singh Bedi and Kirti Azad, smacks of nothing less

than manipulation, nepotism and corruption. The usual

cheap corruption tricks of a low level minion,

construction of a stadium, falsification of bills and

accounts. The Ministry of Corporate Affairs constituted a

three-member team of the Serious Fraud Investigation

Office to investigate Azad’s claims, but by the time the

SFIO’s report was completed, in March 2014, Jaitley was

no longer DDCA president, and he did not contest the

2013 election. The SFIO’s report confirmed Azad’s

allegations of financial irregularity, but Jaitley managed

to escape any indictment for the corruption under his

watch. Clearly, a scam closed up by the scamster who

occupies a position of great power in our country.
























 
 

OROP ; PORTRAIT OF A WARRIOR



                            PORTRAIT OF A WARRIOR

                                          

Sharan_Ahuja 22 hours ago

          
OROP.FLASH RR COL PUSHPINDER WITH MOTHER REFUSES TO EAT Going bad. to worse.. May GOD KEEP HIM TICKING.. Rgds sharan
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Monday, August 31, 2015

OROP : OPEN LETTER TO THE FIFTH COLUMN POWER GRABBERS OF TROIKA OF DESH DROHIS








This is an open letter written to what has emerged as a troika of axis powers inimical to the interests of the Armed Forces.
On the first point of the troika is the honourable finance minister, Mr. Arun Jaitley, who is ably supported in conveying various incorrect state of procedures and issues by the other two points of the troika - Mr. Rajat Sharma (from the electronic media) and the management of The Times of India (from the print media).

 I qualify my statement as given above with reference to a statement given by the Finance Minister with regard to OROP two days ago followed by two/three articles in The Times of India, one as late as this morning and the repeated viewing by the India TV channel of as supposed rift between the officers on one hand and JCOs and Other Ranks on the other hand.

 A few figures would be in order


 a) Total No. of Ex-servicemen: 26 Lakhs pan India
b) Total No. of widows: 6 Lakhs pan India


 Out of this, beneficiaries of OROP
i) JCOs/ ORs/ Widows: 86%
ii) Officers: 14%
iii) Total Payout:
Officers: 2200 Cr (Approx)
JCOs/ORs/Widows: 6200 Cr (Approx)

 Having said that, I think we would put to rest issues raised both by TOI and India TV as to who is going to benefit more.

 Now, let us point our finger at the fountainhead of all controversy, Mr. Arun Jaitley who has had the temerity of questioning the very definition of OROP as accepted by parliaments thrice over and pulled up by the Supreme Court of India.


It would be interesting to note that the Defence Ministry which is the nodal point for all matters relating to the Defence Forces has completed all the calculations and permutations to the last detail and submitted to the Finance Ministry as far back as 17th March this year. 

 It is, therefore, quite surprising that five months down the line, the finance ministry has not shown the ability to give the All Clear to the PMO for implementation. 

 What is further shocking is the kind of excuses and issues being brought up from time to time to somehow derail any modicum of talk or understanding between stakeholders that could have resulted in a resolution by now. 

 I would hasten to add that this particular part of my letter has been prepared by one of the most learned senior officers of the Indian Air Force who is an authority on OROP.
 

 It is reliably learnt that a certain meeting taken by the Defence Minister where representatives of Service HQ as well as members of the governing/executive committee of ESM organizations were present, the following was made clear and obvious and approved by the Defence Minister: -

 1. There isn’t an annual increment of pension because increment is for every additional year of service rendered to the Nation either as Services personnel or as a civilian Govt employee.


 Elucidation A: - Increments are paid for every subsequent year in service i.e pay of a serving personnel A with 25 years’ service will be 3% lesser than the pay of a serving personnel B with 26 years of service.

 Elucidation B: - Pension is paid on the basis of the last pay drawn for the number of years of service rendered. In the above example, A will get a pension for 25 years of service and B will get a pension for 26 years of service. An increment will mean that A will get the pension of B, who has rendered 26 years of service and pension of B will have to be incremented and become pension for 27 years of service.

 The Origin of the 3% annual increment in pensions


 2. However from a summary of the minutes of the first meeting it is well worth noting that it appears that the seeds of the mischief of an increment were sown in the incorrect recording of minutes of this meeting compiled by O/o CGDA in the following manner: -

 2.1 At Para 4 (c) of the minutes, O/o CGDA recorded the minutes as follows: -


 As future enhancements have to be automatically passed on to the pensioners,Services proposal for incremental increase in pension on 1st July every year shall be considered.


 2.2. The mischief that is now being projected in the media and misquotes by some leaders of ESM was corrected by Rear Admiral P Joshi, Chairman PARC & Naval Pay Commission Cell when he deleted the above and inserted and initialed in the margin in his own handwriting before he signed the minutes of the JWG: -


 As future enhancements have to be automatically passed on to the pensioners, Service proposal for annual revision of OROP tables should be considered.


 3. There would be an annual review in OROP. This is to remove the following anomalies: -


 3.1. If C retires in a certain rank with 20 years service on 30 June of that year will draw less than D who retires with 20 years of service on 31st July of the same year because D gets the benefit of 3% increment on 1st July.


 3.2. Bunching effect of 4 years in 4th CPC, 3 years in 5th CPC and 2 years in 6th CPC


 3.3. Implementation of AVSC Phase I w.e.f 16th December 2004. It has resulted in officers being promoted to say Select rank of Lt Col in the 18th but those after 16thDecember 2004 being promoted in the 14th year.



 4. Perusal of the modified/enhanced parity tables indicate a pension of Rs 7065 for a Sepoy in the 20 to 27 years service bracket and become Rs 7175 if the Sepoy served 27.5 years or more. Similar cap will occur for all personnel within a time frame of 5 years. Therefore, alarm bells rung by vitiated persons are based on lack of information or mala-fide misunderstanding the issue of OROP
 

 5. It has been calculated and re validated with data for the period of 5 years and the financial effect is estimated to be 0.85% or Rs 185 crore.

 6. The first annual review was scheduled to take place on 1st Jul 2015 and the next annual review would take place on 1st January 2016, when the recommendations of the 7th CPC kick in. Thereafter all annual reviews would be effective from 1st January of that year.

 7. It is understood that the 7th CPC is very clear about the differences between Civilian pension and Military pension. Due to the Civilian Govt employees serving till the age of 60 years, it has been termed mature pension. Because Services personnel retire at younger ages, Military pension has been termed “aborted” pension, deserving a different method of being dealt with.

 

 8. It is also understood that the ESM present at the meeting (Lt Gen Balbir Singh, Maj Gen Satbir Singh, Brig Katara, Gp Capt Gandhi etc) had vouched for the DGL prepared for OROP and the arguments in favour of matters cited in above paragraphs.


 9. I reproduce gist of the Resolution 1/I/S/2008 which approved the recommendations of the 6th CPC with certain modifications: -

 9.1. Para 1, Note 1: The edge presently accorded to Indian Administrative Service and Indian Foreign Service at three grades STS, JAG and SG will continue in the form of two additional increments @ 3% each will be adjusted in the pay band(emphasis supplied).
 

 Interpretation: The 3% increments are for IAS & Indian Foreign Service for the 3 grades and it will be absorbed in the Pay Bands of the 6th CPC. There isn’t anything for Armed Forces like the Lt Gen (retd) believes.
 

 9.2. Annex I (VII) – Annual increment states 3% across the board except for high performers who will get 4% increments in certain grades.
 

 9.3. SAI (and SNI/SAFI) No. 1 and 2/S/2008 also do not (Repeat) do not contain anymention of two increments of 3%.

 10. Therefore, the 3% annual increase quoted is nothing but a red herring. Is that why we have ESM on fast unto death believing that 3% increment has to be part of OROP?

 

 
Now some data


 11. Up to the rank of Major (and equivalents) who are in service will have lower pay in Apr 2014 than say Apr 2007 effect of AVSC which was effective from 16 Dec 2004 .
 

 12. Similarly, in higher ranks there is no guarantee that a Col with 28 years service in Apr 2014 will draw a lower pay and pension than a Col in the 28th year completed in Apr 2015 or Apr 2016, simply due to the fact of higher fixation to 2014 retiree in January 2006. In fact most cells in the DGL tables will not change every year.



13. Conclusion:
The above tables clearly show that in steady state, pension will not be revised every year.
 

 Majors/Lt Colonels/Colonels promoted earlier will draw the same pay and pension as the one promoted after him.

 Once pension is reset on 1.4.2014 thereafter no change will take place except on the implementation of the recommendations of the 7th CPC.

 For ORs and JCOs (retd) readers – tables are being prepared and will be posted ASAP. Please understand that there are factors such as Group X, Y and the erstwhile Z as well as maximum benefit etc and many JCOs having reached the top of the table on 17 Jan 2013.
 

 14. I hope clear the air and reduce the fog of mistrust and, consequent but inadvertent misinformation & misunderstanding of the red herring of 3% (annual) increment in pensions.


 

 Having belied the much touted assertions of past pay-outs, I now come to the second part which relates to the Officers-JCOs-ORs relationship. 

 The Indian Armed Forces have a rock-steady relationship among the various ranks, differences of opinions notwithstanding. A platoon is led by one officer and has 35 JOCOs/ORs. Similarly, a company has a ratio of 2:118 and a Regt/Battalion 25:1000. For the uninitiated, it is these entities who, working cohesively, achieve the results that this nation demands of them.


The Chetwoodian motto is followed in letter and spirit even after retirement. 

 Therefore, OROP, as explained above is mainly correcting a portion of the perceived wrong done to all our men in the last 67 years. It may be noted by all readers that baring a motley crowd of 12 JCO/OR, sitting on a platform separately from that of the UFESM, does not constitute a rift in such a strong bond. As you may not have noticed, Mr. Rajat Sharma and the management of TOI, the OROP agitation is running across 60-70 cities pan India with a happy mix of Officers, JCOs and Other Ranks affiliated to UFESM. 

 I hope this clears the air and you will stop issuing Press Releases and statements that cause harm to those who have made it their business to prevent you from coming to any harm.
Your initial ignorance of the agitation was better than this half-baked information being put out.

 Col. Anil Kaul, VrC
Media Advisor
UFESM

 

OROP : CLICK , OPEN , SIGN & FORWARD


 Change.org ·



Let us clear the public perception, as also aid the “Decision Making”. Babus project the “Defence Pension Budget” as one figure which sounds fairly large. A major argument against OROP is that this would increase exponentially. The fact is 45%...
change.org

Sunday, August 30, 2015

OROP : LETTER TO THE PRESIDENT & SUPREME COMMANDER OF ARMED FORCES OF INDIA



         OROP : LETTER TO THE PRESIDENT
                                       &
              SUPREME COMMANDER
                                      OF
                  ARMED FORCES OF INDIA


                          Most Immediate


Resposibility of life of an Ex Servicemen  on Fast Unto Death


From
Aggrieved ESM of India.



To,

His Excellency The  President of India

Subject :Danger of Life of  Ex Servicemen  on   Indefinite fast/Relay Hunger Strike


Your Excellency


We are the veterans of tri services of India and your Excellency is our supreme commander.  We the Ex Servicemen (ESM) are sitting on agitation Relay Hunger Strike (RHS) since 15th jun 2015 at Jantar Mantar  for One Rank One Pension (OROP ) and today is 76th day of Relay Hunger Strike.


Fast Unto Death- We were expecting that Government of India will announce OROP immediately after we started RHS. That did not happen. Then we expected that the Government of  India will announce OROP on 15th of Aug but we were disappointed again. Prime Minister did not declare implementation of  OROP and hence under protest Two ESMs  sat on FUD on 16thAug 2015. A soldier is supposed to kill enemy before laying down his life for country. But under your rule a soldier’s life is at stake and is being  wasted as he is being deprived for his legitimate dues.


One ESM Col Pushpender Singh is on Fast Unto Death. He  was hospitalized because his medical condition was deteriorated  after 9th day of Fast Unto Death. He was replaced by two more Ex Servicemen and every day more Ex Servicemen are joining FUD voluntarily even after repeated request by the organizers not to go on FUD . As on today 10 Ex Servicemen are observing FUD.


Hav Major Singh who Started FUD on 16th Aug 2015 is on 14th day of FUD. Panel of Doctors have declared that his medical condition is deteriorated  to dangerous level and he need s to be hospitalized immediately to save his life. Hav Major Singh has refused to be evacuated to the hospital and he is steadfast in his resolve that he will not take any medical treatment till OROP is implemented as per the approved definition.


Your Excellency and the GOI will be solely responsible if any damage / mishap happens to Hav Major Singh or any other ESM because of hunger strike. Your excellency  you are requested to kindly  instruct the GOI to implement  OROP as per the MOD GOI letter Dated 26th Feb 2014. It is pertinent to mention that there are some issues where financial cost can not be the sole determinant factor. Thee pensions of defense veterans is one of these. 



 OROP stands approved both by the UPA as well as the present NDA govt . However, its implementation has not been carried out so far for the reason best known to your govt. In our meetings with DM. We had been informed that the proposal for implementation of OROP costing Rs8298.48 Crs had been
approved by the DM and forwarded to the Ministry of Finance on 17th mar 2015. It is here, where OROP file seems to have been stuck. 

May we request you to kindly instruct your Government of India to immediately implement OROP without any dilution whatsoever 


“Jis desh ke Sainik Sadko par us Desh ka Durbhagya Hai”

Aggrieved ESM of India.

Lt Col Inderjeet Singh                        
Lt Gen Balbir Singh                
Maj Gen Satbir Singh
























 

OROP : The OROP Betrayal and its Consequences- ‘Start-up OROP; Stand Up Veterans’.

SOURCE;
http://www.dailypioneer.com/columnists/edit/the-orop-betrayal-and-its-consequences.html




              ‘Start-up OROP; Stand Up Veterans’


     The OROP Betrayal and its Consequences


The executive’s continued delay in implementing one-rank-one-pension shows a victory for the bureaucracy.The Prime Minister must personally intervene, else there will be an unprecedented crisis in civil-military ties




A very agitated Colonel Sheel Puri, a veteran of many wars and Vir Chakra winner, called from Kolkata on Saturday to say he watched on TV the insensitive manhandling by the police of an 83-year old ex-Serviceman protesting at the Jantar Mantar over one-rank-one-pension. His shirt torn and medals asunder, the person in question was a war veteran. The police action was horribly wrong — inflicting an indignity on the patriotic Armed Forces just when all eyes and ears were focused on Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Independence Day speech from the ramparts of the Red Fort.


He was widely expected to announce the implementation of the OROP, which he had promised at least thrice earlier, including once after becoming Prime Minister. In a surprising U-turn — one more to the 56 turnabouts since he came to power — he said, “Even after I came into Government, I have not been able to do OROP till now. I am assuring my soldiers once again, in principle OROP has been accepted. But talks with stakeholders are on”.


The ‘talks’ bit is new. It represents a victory for the babudom in stalling the OROP, shows how lightly the Government takes the veterans, and what little work was done by past Governments on OROP over the last 20 years and this Government for 17 months. The capture of the vote-bank was more important than delivering on promises.


Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar has no face to show as he has periodically given new dates for implementation of the OROP. His latest is ‘four more days’. Similarly, other Ministers are not embarrassed revising dates. A former Army Chief, Gen VK Singh, who ran rings around the previous Government regarding his age issue, is silent as a Minister on an issue that concerns the larger veterans’ community. (Remember ‘duty’ and ‘disgust’?) So is another Minister, Col Rajyavardhan Rathore.


India has 2,25,000 military pensioners/veterans with around 6,00,000 widows who draw lifetime pensions. With a family of four persons, approximately 10 million pensioners constitute the vote-bank and will benefit from the OROP. Ex-Servicemen are questioning the delay in implementing of OROP which was accepted in principle 17 months ago and are blaming it on the ‘bad intention’ of the bureaucracy. Once again, the bureaucracy has triumphed in blocking the legitimate rights of veterans invoking the principle of national good.
The Armed Forces have suffered, since independence, at the hands of a bureaucracy, that has usurped civilian control of the military from politicians — the hallmark of plural democracy. This frees politicians for the one job they do best: Canvas for votes on notional promises. Bureaucracy has systematically undermined the interests of the Armed Forces from progressive dimunition of status to short-changing them on their perks and privileges.


Though some of the blame for the dilution in authority and standing has to be taken by the military for letting itself be divided and ruled. Lured by jobs as Ambassadors, Governors and members of Army tribunals, service chiefs and top military commanders have allowed the OROP to drift. After all, today’s soldier is tomorrow’s veteran — 50,000 soldiers join the veterans’ rank every year.


Four Service chiefs wrote an open letter to the President of India, the Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces, to intervene and end the Government’s consistent ignoring and humiliation of veterans. Many old soldiers believe that the Government does not take peaceful protests and veterans seriously. “They are a spent force” is the view of some babus.
Many soldiers and veterans who voted for the BJP are severely disillusioned with it for positioning itself as a nationalist, pro-fauji and strong on defence-and-security-policy party, primarily to win votes. “Look at the U-turn it has made on Pakistan after promising a no-nonsense robust and muscular response to Pakistan’s duplicity” is a common refrain. It is dangerous to play with the sentiments of the veterans as the OROP has become a metaphor for the respect and dignity with which the Government and country hold them.


Dismayed by police action roughing up veterans to evict them from Jantar Mantar as they would constitute a security threat, another 10 former Service chiefs wrote to the Prime Minister condemning police action and expressing regret over the inability of the political leadership to resolve the issue. Many of them have appeared on television to register their disappointment over the unnecessary delay in implementation and its impact on the morale of soldiers.


Someone ill-advised the Finance Ministry, which is doing the arithmetic of OROP monies, that time is on its side, as the protests will dissipate.


Rather late in the day, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley said that several interpretations of the “principle” were holding up its arithmetical translation.

To reduce the financial burden, the Government is considering a new base year of 2011 instead of 2014 agreed earlier. The figures being bandied vary from the original Rs8,300 crore to Rs13,000 crore enhancing the annual pension bill of Rs55,000 crore. The Government chose former Army Chief, Gen VP Malik, as a mediator to break the impasse over the base year. Unable to bridge the gap, Gen Malik quit. What separates the two sides is just Rs5,000 crore.


Rumours are flying thick and fast. Unable and unwilling to resolve the tangle, the Government may hand over the OROP issue to the Seventh Pay Commission. Another reason for the delay is locking the OROP in a statutory framework. Veterans though have dug in with the intent to progressively intensify protests.

 They are clear on two issues — no tampering with the definition of OROP accepted by Parliament in 2011; parity in pension for those retiring in the same rank and duration of service, irrespective of the time of retirement; and the date of implementation from April 1 2014.

Government giving a timeframe for OROP implementation will break the stalemate.


The Armed Forces are a stand-alone institution incomparable with any civilian service and Central armed police forces. The bogey that ‘others’ will demand an OROP is being spread by the babus. The veterans’ movement has been sanctified by 14 former Service chiefs, which is unprecedented. Undoing the injustice of the last 50 years to veterans is the key.


Mr Modi’s personal credibility is at stake.


 Civil-military relations have reached a breaking point.

Only his direct engagement with the aggrieved will avert an unprecedented crisis. Apology for police action will be gracious. Re-phrasing his Independence Day slogan is in order: ‘Start-up OROP; stand up veterans’.



‘Start-up OROP; stand up veterans’.