Friday, May 19, 2017

Conflict in the Middle East threatens Pakistan and lynchpin of China's One Belt, One Road (r)

SOURCE:
[ a ] https://mideastsoccer.blogspot.in/2017/05/conflict-in-middle-east-threatens.html

[b] https://www.academia.edu/33006712/Conflict_in_the_Middle_East_threatens_Pakistan_and_lynchpin_of_Chinas_One_Belt_One_Road


Conflict in the Middle East threatens Pakistan and lynchpin of China's One Belt, One Road

By James M. Dorsey




Increasingly caught up in the Middle East’s multiple conflicts, Pakistan is struggling to balance relations with rivals Saudi Arabia and Iran amid concern in Islamabad that potential US-Saudi efforts to destabilize the Islamic republic could turn its crucial province of Balochistan, a lynchpin in China’s One Belt, One Road initiative, into a battleground.

Concern about Balochistan is buffeted by a sense in Islamabad of problems along its multiple borders. Pakistani officials fear that China may be seeking closer ties with India at Pakistan’s expense, despite its massive $56 billion investment in Pakistani infrastructure that centres on linking the troubled Baloch port of Gwadar, a gateway to the Gulf, with China’s restive, north-western province of Xinjiang.

Pakistani officials see a statement by China’s ambassador to India, Luo Zhaohui, that China had no interest in being dragged into the Pakistani-Indian dispute over Kashmir, as an indication that Beijing is cosying up to New Delhi at Islamabad’s expense.

Mr. Zhaohui was trying to persuade India to engage with One Belt, One Road on the eve of a summit in Beijing to promote China’s geopolitical ploy in Eurasia. Twenty-eight heads of state, including Pakistani Prime Minister Nawal Sharif, were expected to attend the summit that starts this weekend.

Adding to Pakistani fears are increased tensions with Afghanistan following a clash in early May between Pakistani and Afghan forces in which 15 people were killed and dozens wounded. The clash occurred days after Afghan President Ashraf Ghani rejected an invitation to visit Pakistan conveyed by Pakistani intelligence chief Lt. General Naveed Mukhtar.

Sources close to Mr. Ghani quoted the president as telling General Mukhtar that none of the 48 agreements signed with Pakistan during his 2014 visit to Islamabad had been implemented. The agreements included an understanding that Pakistan would bring the Taliban to the negotiating table. “I spent political capital on that. That was the deal,” the sources quoted Mr. Ghani as saying.

Sources close to the Taliban and Pakistani intelligence said Mr. Ghani’s rejection of the invitation followed two meetings in Norway on January 8 and 18 in the waning days of the Obama administration between an unidentified member of the US Congress, a CIA official, and representatives of the Taliban.

The officials said the meetings focussed on the possible of release of an American-Canadian couple who have been held by the Taliban since 2012. The sources said the talks also explored unsuccessfully ways of negotiating an end to the fighting in Afghanistan. A spokesperson for the US embassy in Islamabad declined comment.

Meanwhile, two attacks in the last 48 hours highlighted mounting tension in Balochistan against the backdrop of thinly veiled Saudi threats to stir ethnic unrest across the Baloch border in the Iranian province of Sistan-Baluchistan and among the Islamic republic’s minority Iranian Arab, Kurdish and Azerbaijani minorities.

Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) gunmen on motorbikes opened fire on construction workers in Gwadar, killing ten. The attack exploited widespread discontent among Baloch that they were not benefitting from massive Chinese investment in their province that was providing employment primarily for workers from elsewhere in Pakistan. The victims of the attack were from the Pakistani province of Sindh.

"This conspiratorial plan (CPEC) is not acceptable to the Baloch people under any circumstances. Baloch independence movements have made it clear several times that they will not abandon their people's future in the name of development projects or even democracy,” said BLA spokesman Jeander Baloch. Mr. Baloch was referring to Chinese investment in what has been dubbed the China Pakistan Economic Corridor.

The Islamic State’s South Asian wing claimed responsibility a day earlier for abombing near the Baloch capital of Quetta that targeted Senator Abdul Ghafoor Haideri, the deputy chairman of the upper house of parliament, and a member of Jamiat e Ulema Islam, a right-wing Sunni Islamist political party that is part of Prime Minister Sharif's coalition government. Twenty-five people were killed in the blast that wounded Mr. Haideri.

The two attacks as well as Friday’s US Treasury designation of Maulana Ali Muhammad Abu Turab as a specially designated terrorist highlighted the murky world of Pakistani militancy in which the lines between various groups are fluid, links to government are evident, and battles in Pakistan and Afghanistan and potentially Iran are inter-linked.

Mr. Abu Turab is a prominent Pakistani Islamic scholar of Afghan descent who serves on a government-appointed religious board, maintains close ties to Saudi Arabia, runs a string of madrassas attended by thousands of students along Balochistan’s with Afghanistan and is a major fund raiser for militant groups.

Putting Saudi Arabia on the spot, the Treasury announced the designation of Mr. Abu Turab, a leader of Ahl-i-Hadith, a Saudi-supported Pakistani Wahhabi group and board member of Pakistan’s Saudi-backed Paigham TV, who serves on Pakistan’s Council of Islamic Ideology, a government-appointed advisory body of scholars and laymen established to assist in bringing laws in line with the Qur’an and the example of the Prophet Mohammed, as he was visiting the kingdom and Qatar on the latest of numerous fund raising trips to the Gulf. 

Mr. Abu Turab also heads the Saudi-funded Movement for the Protection of the Two Holy Cities (Tehrike Tahafaz Haramain Sharifain) whose secretary general Maulana Fazlur Rehman Khalil has also been designated by the Treasury.

After years of flying low, Mr. Abu Turab appeared to have attracted US attention with his increasingly public support for Saudi Arabia as well as Pakistani militants. Mr. Abu Turab regularly shows pictures of his frequent public appearances to Saudi diplomats in Islamabad to ensure continued Saudi funding, according to sources close to him. Mr. Abu Turab called on the Pakistani government in April to support Saudi Arabia and endorse Pakistani General Raheel Sharif’s appointmentas head of the Saudi-led military coalition.

The Treasury described Mr. Abu Turab as a “facilitator…(who) helped…raise money in the Gulf and supported the movement of tens of thousands of dollars from the Gulf to Pakistan.”  The Treasury said funds raised by Mr. Abu Turab, an Afghan who was granted Pakistani citizenship, financed operations of various groups, including Pakistan’s Jama'at ul Dawa al-Qu'ran (JDQ); Lashkar-e-Tayyiba (LT), a Pakistani intelligence-backed group that at times has enjoyed support from Saudi Arabia; the Taliban; and the Islamic State’s South Asian wing.

The Treasury announcement came less than two weeks before Donald J. Trump’s visit to Saudi Arabia on his first trip abroad as US president to discuss cooperation with the kingdom and a Saudi-led, 41-nation Sunni Muslim military alliance led by General Sharif in combatting terrorism and isolating Iran.

Any discussion of efforts to destabilize Iran between US officials and the Saudi-led alliance during Mr. Trump’s visit to the kingdom would likely heighten Pakistan’s difficulty in balancing its relations with Saudi Arabia and Iran and cast a cloud over Chinese hopes that economic development would pacify nationalist and religious militants in both Balochistan and Xinjiang.

Sources close to Pakistani intelligence and Shiite leaders fear that increased conflict in Balochistan and Saudi and Iranian operations in Pakistan could not only suck it into proxy wars between the two Middle Eastern powers but also rekindle sectarian violence in Pakistan itself.

The intelligence sources said they had noticed that Shiite military officers were becoming more assertive in their empathy for Iran in discussions about regional security.  Pakistan’s Shiite minority is the world’s second largest Shiite community after pre-dominantly Shiite Iran.

The sources asserted further that Iran had recently recruited at least 3,000 Pakistani Shiites into its Xenobia brigade that is fighting in Syria in support of the regime of President Bashar al-Assad. The sources said that Pakistan had detained in early May a commander of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) who was on a recruiting mission in Balochistan.

They said the arrest marked a shift in Iran’s recruitment strategy that in the past had relied on Pakistani religious scholars and travel agents. “The Iranians have been clandestinely coming to Balochistan since the fall of the Shah (in 1979),” said a retired Pakistani intelligence chief. 

“Tenuous relations have rekindled a latent Iranian interest in furthering its territorial ambitions. Iran has tried hard to mask this latency but Pakistan remains wary of such intent,” added former vice commander of the Pakistani air force, Shahzad Chaudhry.

Pakistani Shiite leaders fear that sectarianism could be fuelled by Saudi funding of militant anti-Shiite and anti-Iranian groups like Sipah-e-Sahaba, a virulently anti-Shiite and anti-Iranian group that since being banned has rebranded itself as Ahle Sunnat Wal Jamaat, as well as its various offshoots that target Iran. Like Mr. Abu Turab, both groups operate large networks of religious seminaries in Balochistan.

Sources close to the militants said Saudi and UAE nationals of Baloch heritage were funnelling Saudi funds to Islamic scholars like Sipah’s Balochistan leader, Maulana Ramzan Mengal, and Mr. Abu Turab. They said the money was being transferred through hawala agents operating in the Middle East and South Asia.

Iran’s Tabnak News Agency charged that Mr. Trump’s visit to Saudi Arabia was designed to strengthen an anti-Iranian US-Arab alliance against Iran. “The Iranophobic project began a couple of months ago… It appears that the Arab NATO project – which has been under discussion for some time – is entering its implementation stage with American President Trump’s trip to Saudi Arabia and the invitation to 17 Arab countries to Riyadh,” the agency said. The agency is believed to be controlled by former IRGC commander Mohsen Rezaei.

Pakistan’s foreign policy woes appear to have sent its intelligence services into a paranoid tailspin. The services have stepped up in one’s face surveillance, harassment and intimidation of foreigners, prompting some diplomats in Islamabad to lodge complaints with the foreign ministry. Similarly, representatives of Western non-governmental organizations have had extensions of their visas rejected. In some cases, Pakistanis have been interrogated by intelligence agents within the hour of having met with foreigners.



Dr. James M. Dorsey is a senior fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, co-director of the University of Würzburg’s Institute for Fan Culture, and the author ofnstein: The Saudi Export of Ultra-conservatism and China and the 

The Turbulent World of Middle East Soccer blog, a book with the same title, Comparative Political Transitions between Southeast Asia and the Middle East and North Africa, co-authored with Dr. Teresita Cruz-Del Rosario and three forthcoming books, Shifting Sands, Essays on Sports and Politics in the Middle East and North Africa as well as Creating Franke Middle East: Venturing into the Maelstrom.



















Wednesday, May 17, 2017

ASSESSMENT OBOR South Asia: A Bump in the Belt and Road


SOURCE:
https://worldview.stratfor.com/article/south-asia-bump-belt-and-road?utm_campaign=LL_Content_Digest&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=52009364&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-9QUqoprw3eAr9MFZg6OBI7mxoh7P8Pood_MAVTIxzT4mGREp3B_DJUenrAtwd1h6vCwNRdeg6fmdi6sk5q9hg7jSpyHQ&_hsmi=52009364

                           SOUTH ASIA
       : A BUMP IN THE BELT AND ROAD

                










SOURCE:
https://worldview.stratfor.com/article/south-asia-bump-belt-and-road?utm_campaign=LL_Content_Digest&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=52009364&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-9QUqoprw3eAr9MFZg6OBI7mxoh7P8Pood_MAVTIxzT4mGREp3B_DJUenrAtwd1h6vCwNRdeg6fmdi6sk5q9hg7jSpyHQ&_hsmi=52009364







ASSESMENTS



SOUTH ASIA : A BUMP IN THE BELT
                             AND 
                    THE ROAD [OBOR ]






As part of its ambitious Belt and Road Initiative, China is looking to build new inroads into South Asia. The region is rife with opportunity for Beijing. By establishing new security and economic connections with neighburing South Asian countries, China hopes to quell unrest in remote Xinjiang province. South Asia also offers an easy outlet for China's manufactured goods as the country weathers an economic slowdown. In the long term, moreover, the region would afford Beijing access to new trade routes outside the Malacca Strait and the contentious South China Sea. But of all the projects China has undertaken through its Belt and Road Initiative, its ventures in South Asia are the riskiest. The region's deep geopolitical divisions and security challenges could derail Beijing's plans there. And so long as India opposes China's activities in its traditional sphere of influence, the Belt and Road Initiative in South Asia will amount to little more than a bundle of bilateral deals.












Iron Brothers

China's vision for South Asia includes plans to link up the region through ports in Sri Lanka, a potential railway from Nepal’s capital Kathmandu to Lhasa in Tibet and the nascent Bangladesh-China-India-Myanmar Economic Corridor (BCIM-EC). So far, though, it has made significant headway only on the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). CPEC proposes to connect the Chinese city of Kashgar with the deep-water port of Gwadar on the Arabian Sea through a network of roads and railways. The plan also includes numerous energy projects and free trade zones. Since Chinese President Xi Jinping clinched the deal with Islamabad in April 2015, the CPEC has moved quickly into the implementation phase, and its first projects will reach completion this year or the next.


The CPEC's rapid progress is hardly surprising. China often refers to Pakistan as its "iron brother," an affinity that traces back to the Cold War, when the two countries worked to balance against India and helped each other's nuclear development in the 1970s and 1980s. The relationship is not free of tension, of course. Nevertheless, Pakistan's isolation in South Asia has made China an indispensible partner over the years. And CPEC is an unequivocal boon for Islamabad. The Pakistani government hopes the initiative, which will focus on building energy and transportation infrastructure along with free trade zones, will remove the barriers to growth and development that have held Pakistan back for decades.
At its signing, the deal was originally projected to entail around $46 billion in spending. Most of that amount — which has since climbed to $51.5 billion — has been earmarked for energy infrastructure, including a $2.5 billion natural gas pipeline to Iran. Pakistan faces an annual energy deficit of around 4,000 megawatts; demand for energy in the country, meanwhile, is growing at a rate of 10 percent per year. Energy shortages cost Pakistan an estimated 2 to 2.5 percent of gross domestic product growth in 2015. Through CPEC, China hopes to remedy this shortfall by adding an estimated 7,000 megawatts by 2018, building eventually to 16,000 megawatts.
In addition, several road construction and rehabilitation projects — also set to wrap up by 2018 — would enhance connectivity in Pakistan's geographic core and parts of its outlying regions. The corridor makes the most of the country's geography, with many of its projects following the Indus River southwest to the coast on the Arabian Sea, where an initiative to expand and connect the Gwadar port will reduce the strain on other maritime hubs in the country. It could also help Pakistan address some of its most enduring challenges. By connecting the ethnically distinct and impoverished provinces of BalochistanKhyber-Pakhtunkhwa and the Federally Administered Tribal Areas to the country's Punjab heartland, the Pakistani government aims to increase economic opportunity and at the same time quiet unrest.













But Pakistan's geographic and ethnic tensions have already caused problems for the CPEC. Separatist militants in Balochistan have found the plan's infrastructure projects a convenient target to express their grievances. The opposition Pakistan People's Party, similarly, has accused the government of devoting more resources to CPEC initiatives in the country's predominantly Punjab regions. In response to the mounting regional strife, local governments have expanded policing along the corridor, while the Pakistani military has established a special task force and security division to patrol the Gwadar port and a nationwide special security division dedicated to protecting CPEC projects. Still, the militant and political dynamics will become only more complex as the project progresses, and more questions over the project's economic viability will arise.


Overcoming the Partition


Elsewhere in South Asia, Belt and Road will face equally daunting problems, including Afghanistan's continued disarray. The far greater challenge, however, will be securing India's cooperation on the matter. As much as the country wants to project power over its namesake subcontinent and establish strong, secure ties across its borders, it has struggled to do so in its modern history. India's partition in 1947 created lasting rifts with Pakistan and Bangladesh (then known as East Pakistan), which left its orbit after gaining independence. Nepal and Sri Lanka, on the other hand, have each sought support elsewhere to limit New Delhi's influence over their affairs. Despite its rapid growth and position at South Asia's geopolitical core, India has neither the economic clout nor the internal political coherence to overcome its domestic divisions, much less to become a powerful regional hegemon. And China's sway in its periphery threatens New Delhi's prospects for realizing that goal.

China's manufacturing prowess has already made it an important economic power in the Indian subcontinent. Today, the country is the top source of imports for Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh, as well as India; between 2010 and 2015, China's exports to Pakistan doubled. By contrast, Bangladesh is the only South Asian country among India's top 10 export destinations, ranking ninth. India simply can't compete with China when it comes to regional trade. Nepal presents a good case study. After delaying for months to consult India, Nepal decided to sign on to the initiative ahead of the May 14-15 Belt and Road Forum. Ultimately, Katmandu said it could not pass up such a massive economic opportunity. Nor has it had much success with development projects in nearby countries. India's Chabahar port venture in Iran, for instance, has foundered while similar Chinese projects in Pakistan and in Sri Lanka have proceeded apace.As China builds inroads through the region as a result of the Belt and Road Initiative, India must decide whether to throw its weight behind the campaign. Beijing would like New Delhi to participate in Belt and Road; in fact, the success of the Bangladesh-China-India-Myanmar Economic Corridor (BCIM-EC) partly depends on India's involvement. The plan, originally proposed in 1999 — long before Belt and Road — would connect Kolkata with China's Yunnan province, giving India the access it so desires to lucrative markets in Southeast Asia. By adding India to Belt and Road, China hopes to dovetail with the Act East Policy initiated in 1991, something the country's ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has emphasized since it came into power.







But Pakistan's geographic and ethnic tensions have already caused problems for the CPEC. Separatist militants in Balochistan have found the plan's infrastructure projects a convenient target to express their grievances. The opposition Pakistan People's Party, similarly, has accused the government of devoting more resources to CPEC initiatives in the country's predominantly Punjab regions. In response to the mounting regional strife, local governments have expanded policing along the corridor, while the Pakistani military has established a special task force and security division to patrol the Gwadar port and a nationwide special security division dedicated to protecting CPEC projects. Still, the militant and political dynamics will become only more complex as the project progresses, and more questions over the project's economic viability will arise.


Overcoming the Partition

Elsewhere in South Asia, Belt and Road will face equally daunting problems, including Afghanistan's continued disarray. The far greater challenge, however, will be securing India's cooperation on the matter. As much as the country wants to project power over its namesake subcontinent and establish strong, secure ties across its borders, it has struggled to do so in its modern history. India's partition in 1947 created lasting rifts with Pakistan and Bangladesh (then known as East Pakistan), which left its orbit after gaining independence. Nepal and Sri Lanka, on the other hand, have each sought support elsewhere to limit New Delhi's influence over their affairs. Despite its rapid growth and position at South Asia's geopolitical core, India has neither the economic clout nor the internal political coherence to overcome its domestic divisions, much less to become a powerful regional hegemon. And China's sway in its periphery threatens New Delhi's prospects for realizing that goal.
China's manufacturing prowess has already made it an important economic power in the Indian subcontinent. Today, the country is the top source of imports for Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh, as well as India; between 2010 and 2015, China's exports to Pakistan doubled. By contrast, Bangladesh is the only South Asian country among India's top 10 export destinations, ranking ninth. India simply can't compete with China when it comes to regional trade. Nepal presents a good case study. After delaying for months to consult India, Nepal decided to sign on to the initiative ahead of the May 14-15 Belt and Road Forum. Ultimately, Katmandu said it could not pass up such a massive economic opportunity. Nor has it had much success with development projects in nearby countries. India's Chabahar port venture in Iran, for instance, has foundered while similar Chinese projects in Pakistan and in Sri Lanka have proceeded apace.


As China builds inroads through the region as a result of the Belt and Road Initiative, India must decide whether to throw its weight behind the campaign. Beijing would like New Delhi to participate in Belt and Road; in fact, the success of the Bangladesh-China-India-Myanmar Economic Corridor (BCIM-EC) partly depends on India's involvement. The plan, originally proposed in 1999 — long before Belt and Road — would connect Kolkata with China's Yunnan province, giving India the access it so desires to lucrative markets in Southeast Asia. By adding India to Belt and Road, China hopes to dovetail with the Act East Policy initiated in 1991, something the country's ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has emphasized since it came into power.

A Tough Sell

The possible benefits notwithstanding, though, the Belt and Road Initiative also presents major risks for India. With even fewer barriers to trade in the region, Chinese goods could crowd out India's struggling manufacturing sector altogether. For that reason, New Delhi will be careful to keep Chinese imports from overwhelming its consumer market if it decides to join in on the Belt and Road Initiative. India's Cabinet has already passed a proposal mandating the use of domestic steel in state infrastructure projects.

Pakistan's prominent role in the initiative is the another deterrent for India. The rivalry between the two nuclear-equipped nations has become a defining feature of South Asian geopolitics, and it finds enduring expression in the dispute over Kashmir. India claims control of the region in its entirety, though Pakistan and China each administer portions of the territory. And it fears that the CPEC, which runs through Pakistan-controlled Kashmir as well as the Aksai Chin area under Chinese jurisdiction, will change the status quo in the contested region. As it is, the portion of Kashmir that India administers is home to a restive population and an active separatist movement; New Delhi worries that the CPEC will further undermine its authority there.


















































Wednesday, May 10, 2017

KASHMIR TERRORISM HAS BECOME A VESTED INDUSTRY

SOURCE:
http://www.rediff.com/news/interview/the-hindu-seer-who-wants-to-take-on-kashmiri-stone-pelters/20170509.htm?pos=4&src=NL20170510_4&trackid=Ae5tctheb9m4Ou8aLCKR78P/36DqPWYBAsWMfJo0sPI=&isnlp=0&isnlsp=0


KASHMIR TERRORISM HAS BECOME
                     A VESTED INDUSTRY 







                            Balyogi Arun Puri Chaitanya Maharaj, who formed the Jan Sena. 


The Hindu Seer Who Wants To Take on  Pak  Supported Hurriyat  Sponsored  Stone-Pelters



May 09, 2017

'We are not trying to disturb the peace in Kashmir. On the contrary, we want to restore peace in Kashmir.'


IMAGE: A student throws a stone at a policemen during a protest in Srinagar. Photograph: Danish Ismail/Reuters
[BY THE STRUCTURE OF DEVELOPMENT OF THE ARMS  MUSCLES ,THE GUY DEPICTED AS A STUDENT IS A PROFESSIONAL  STONE PELTTER & NOT A STUDENT - Vasundhra ]

In a mission to support security forces in Jammu and Kashmir, a squad called the Jan Sena began its journey to the Kashmir valley on May 7, to respond to the stone-pelting locals by giving them a dose of their own medicine -- pelting stones back at them.

The group, which includes Muslims and sadhus, is part of a voluntary organisation set up by Kanpur-based Balyogi Arun Puri Chaitanya Maharaj.

Balyogi Arun Puri Chaitanya Maharaj tells Rediff.com's Syed Firdaus Ashraf why the Jan Sena decided to involve itself in Kashmir.

Why are you organising this movement against Kashmiri stone-pelters?

This move has come about after we saw what happened to our jawans  in  Jammu-Kashmir post the elections (a couple of CRPF jawans were mocked, pushed around and kicked by Kashmiri protesters).

The Hurriyat and others mislead Kashmiri youngsters. Now they are insulting our army and a nation of 125 crore people.

They want Jammu and Kashmir to secede from India and therefore we have formed this Jan Sena.

When did you form this group?

We formed it a month ago. 15,000 youth have joined our Sena. We want this Sena to go to Kashmir and give a befitting reply to Kashmiri stone-pelters.

As of now, we have only one office in Kanpur, but soon we will expand to other cities across the nation.

How can one join your organisation? Will those who join it be paid?

We are not going to give any money to anybody.

Whoever loves the nation can join us.

Jammu and Kashmir is and will always be a part of India and those who share these feelings must join us.

Sena ke samman mein, Jan Sena maidan mein

 (To respect the army, the Jan Sena
                                                 has come to the battlefield)

What training are you giving people who join your group?

We have made artificial statues of human beings and are training our youth how to throw stones at these statues.

There is a proper training procedure which they have to follow. At present, we are only training our youth how to pelt stones against Kashmiri stone-pelters.

We are giving this training on the ghats of the Ganga. Other kinds of training will follow later.

When does your first batch of youth leave for Kashmir?
On May 7, we took a batch of 1,500 youth from Kanpur to Kashmir.
We performed a havan before leaving.
On April 24, we wrote to the Prime Minister's Office asking for permission to go, but we did not get any reply.
We have taken dal, chana, some wood (for lighting fire) to go to Kashmir.
As we left Kanpur, the police stopped us. They did not allow us to proceed to Kashmir.
We refused to be stopped and reached Kanauj, which is the next district to Kanpur.

What training are you giving people who join your group?

We have made artificial statues of human beings and are training our youth how to throw stones at these statues.

There is a proper training procedure which they have to follow. At present, we are only training our youth how to pelt stones against Kashmiri stone-pelters.

We are giving this training on the ghats of the Ganga. Other kinds of training will follow later.

When does your first batch of youth leave for Kashmir?
On May 7, we took a batch of 1,500 youth from Kanpur to Kashmir.

We performed a havan before leaving.

On April 24, we wrote to the Prime Minister's Office asking for permission to go, but we did not get any reply.

We have taken dal, chana, some wood (for lighting fire) to go to Kashmir.

As we left Kanpur, the police stopped us. They did not allow us to proceed to Kashmir.

We refused to be stopped and reached Kanauj, which is the next district to Kanpur.

Don't you think it is better for a sanyasi like you to speak the language of love with Kashmiris rather than the language of violence?

We have tried to reach out to the Kashmiris for long, but no solution has come out till date.

You may recall that recently an all-party delegation had gone to Kashmir to talk to Hurriyat leaders, but they refused to meet and talk to them.

So, according to you, your Sena throwing stones at Kashmiri stone-pelters is a solution to the Kashmir issue.
These people do not understand the language of love. We have spoken with love many times, but did not succeed.
You know why? Because these stone-pelters only understand the language of violence.
Why has America never been attacked post 9/11? The answer is because they went to Abbottabad in Pakistan and killed Osama bin Laden.

Were you associated with any political party earlier?

I am a Naga sanyasi. I took sanyas at the age of 14, but after seeing the Kashmir situation I realised we should help our soldiers.

We have such a huge army of people in India, but we don't support our troops.
I feel that till we don't resettle the Kashmiri Pandits, the problem of Kashmir won't be solved.
You see how the human rights of the Kashmiri Pandits were violated in Kashmir.
 Do you feel you will find a solution to the problems in Kashmir by throwing stones at the stone-pelters?
Yes, I do.
Take jallikattu. The Supreme Court had banned jallikattu, but the Tamil Nadu government brought a notification and passed the jallikattu Act.
So you see, anything is possible owing to public pressure.
If there are thousands of people from India ready to go and throw stones at Kashmiri stone-pelters, then even the Supreme Court will agree to my move.
What about violence?

Violence is the only answer to violence.
I am ready to die and let my body be wrapped in the Indian tricolour.
The Pakistani army is a wretched army. They beheaded our soldiers, which was a very horrible thing to do.

MORE KASHMIR FEATURES IN THE RELATED LINKS BELOW...
Syed Firdaus Ashraf / Rediff.com








Tuesday, May 9, 2017

THE ROUGE STATE : NO WONDER THIS PIG IS FATTER THAN THE FATTEST PIG IN MY UNIT PIGGERY

SOURCE : 
http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/nawaz-sharif-took-money-from-osama-bin-laden-to-promote-jihad-in-kashmir-says-imran-khans-party-repo-1691383




















                                         THE ROUGE STATE

NO WONDER THIS PIG IS FATTER THAN THE FATTEST PIG IN MY UNIT PIGGERY




Nawaz Sharif Took Money From Osama Bin Laden To Fund Jihad In Kashmir, Says Imran Khan's Party: Report


Pakistan's Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif has been accused of taking money from al Qaeda terrorist Osama bin Laden in order to promote and fund jihad in Kashmir. The allegation has been made by cricketer-turned-politician Imran Khan







ISLAMABAD: 

HIGHLIGHTS

  1. The allegations are based on a book written by an ex-ISI spy's wife
  2. Nawaz Sharif has been accused of taking 1.5 billion from bin Laden
  3. Imran Khan said his party would file a petition in court against Pak PM


 Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif has been accused of taking money from al Qaeda terrorist Osama bin Laden to promote jihad in Kashmir. 

The allegation has been made by opposition leader Imran Khan's party - Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf.


Imran Khan has been demanding Nawaz Sharif's resignation over alleged corruption. Fawad Chaudhry, a spokesperson from Imaran Khan's party said yesterday that he would file a petition in Pakistan's Supreme Court seeking admission of a case against Mr Sharif for "taking funds from a foreign individual to destabilise and conspire" against the country, The Express Tribune reported.

Mr Khan's party says it bases its claim against Nawaz Sharif on interviews and excerpts from a book 'Khalid Khawaja: Shaheed-e-Aman' by Shamama Khalid, wife of a former Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) spy Khalid Khawaja, who was brutally murdered in 2010 by the Pakistani Taliban.

"Relying on the revelations made in certain interviews and a book, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf intends to open up a shady chapter in the country's political history from late 1980s in an apparent bid to further malign (Nawaz) Sharif," the report in Express Tribune said.

The interviews and the book claim that Mr Sharif "took money, amounting to Rs. 1.5 billion from former al-Qaeda chief Osama Bin Laden to promote jihad in Kashmir and Afghanistan," the report said.

They also claim that later, an amount of Rs. 270 million from this money was utilised to support a no-confidence move against Benazir Bhutto in 1989, the report said.


However in 2013, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf leader Masood Sharif Khan Khattak, who is a former director general of the Intelligence Bureau (IB) had submitted a statement before the Supreme Court in a case related to misappropriation of the IB funds in 1989.

In his nine-page statement, Mr Khattak had claimed that the moving force behind the vote of no-confidence against Ms Bhutto in 1989 was not political and named former president Ghulam Ishaq Khan and former army chief Mirza Aslam Baig, claiming that they wanted to keep Ms Bhutto out of power, the report said.

Mr Chaudhry, meanwhile said, "In the past, (Nawaz) Sharif remained an active part of several conspiracies against the elected governments".

Last week, Imaran Khan's party announced to open up another legal front against Nawaz Sharif, saying it would file a petition demanding implementation on a 2012 verdict of Pakistan's top court in the Asghar Khan case which determined that Mr Sharif and other politicians had received money from an intelligence agency prior to the 1990 general election to form an alliance against the Pakistan Peoples Party.

He said the two cases would be filed this week.