Friday, October 13, 2017

ISLAM AT WAR :A Pragmatic Overview of Islamic Civil Wars

SOURCE:
http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/262936/muslim-world-permanent-refugee-crisis-daniel-greenfield






A  Pragmatic Overview of Islamic Civil Wars
By
Daniel Greenfield

Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Centre

THIS IS NOT LOOKING GOOD FOR OUR GRANDCHILDREN AND THEIR CHILDREN

A pragmatic overview of what appears to be an insoluble problem affecting much of the world as we know it today?



“Forget the Syrian Civil War for a moment. Even without the Sunnis and Shiites competing to give each other machete haircuts every sunny morning, there would still be a permanent Muslim refugee crisis.



The vast majority of civil wars over the last ten years have taken place in Muslim countries. Muslim countries are also some of the poorest in the world. And Muslim countries also have high birth rates.



Combine violence and poverty with a population boom and you get a permanent migration crisis. No matter what happens in Syria or Libya next year, that permanent migration crisis isn't going away.



The Muslim world is expanding unsustainably. In the Middle East and Asia, Muslims tend to underperform their non-Muslim neighbours both educationally and economically. Oil is the only asset that gave Muslims any advantage and in the age of fracking, its value is a lot shakier than it used to be.



The Muslim world had lost its old role as the intermediary between Asia and the West. And it has no economic function in the new world except to blackmail it by spreading violence and instability.



Muslim countries with lower literacy rates, especially for women, are never going to be economic winners at any trade that doesn't come gushing out of the ground. Nor will unstable dictatorships ever be able to provide social mobility or access to the good life. At best they'll hand out subsidies for bread.



The Muslim world has no prospects for getting any better. The Arab Spring was a Western delusion.



Growing populations divided along tribal and religious lines are competing for a limited amount of land, power and wealth. Countries without a future are set to double in size.



There are only two solutions; war or migration. Either you fight and take what you want at home. Or you go abroad and take what you want there.



Let's assume that the Iraq War had never happened. How would a religiously and ethnically divided Iraq have managed its growth from 13 million in the eighties to 30 million around the Iraq War to 76 million in 2050? The answer is a bloody civil war followed by genocide, ethnic cleansing and migration.



What's happening now would have happened anyway. It was already happening under Saddam Hussein.



Baghdad has one of the highest population densities in the world, and it has no future. The same is true across the region. The only real economic plan anyone here has is to get money from the West. 



Plan A for getting money out of the West is creating a crisis that will force it to intervene. That can mean anything from starting a war to aiding terrorists that threaten the West. Muslim countries keep shooting themselves in the foot so that Westerners will rush over to kiss the booboo and make it better.



Plan B is to move to Europe. What's This? And Plan B is a great plan. It's the only real economic plan that works. At least until the West runs out of native and naïve Westerners who foot the bill for all the migrants, refugees and outright settlers.



For thousands of dollars, a Middle Eastern Muslim can pay to be smuggled into Europe. It's a small investment with a big payoff. Even the lowest tier welfare benefits in Sweden are higher than the average salary in a typical Muslim migrant nation. And Muslim migrants are extremely attuned to the payoffs. It's why they clamor to go to Germany or Sweden, not Greece or Slovakia. And it's why they insist on big cities with an existing Muslim social welfare infrastructure, not some rural village.



A Muslim migrant is an investment for an entire extended family. Once the young men get their papers, family reunification begins. That doesn't just mean every extended family member showing up and demanding their benefits. It also means that the family members will be selling access to Europe to anyone who can afford it. Don't hike or raft your way to Europe. Mohammed or Ahmed will claim that you're a family member. Or temporarily marry you so you can bring your whole extended family along.



Mohammed gets paid. So does Mo's extended family which brokers these transactions. Human trafficking doesn't just involve rafts. It's about having the right family connections. 



And all that is just the tip of a very big business iceberg.



Where do Muslim migrants come up with a smuggling fee that amounts to several years of salary for an average worker? Some come from wealthy families. Others are sponsored by crime networks and family groups that are out to move everything from drugs to weapons to large numbers of people into Europe.



Large loans will be repaid as the new migrants begin sending their new welfare benefits back home. Many will be officially unemployed even while unofficially making money through everything from slave labour to organized crime. European authorities will blame their failure to participate in the job market on racism rather than acknowledging that they exist within the confines of an alternate economy.



It's not only individuals or families who can pursue Plan B. Turkey wants to join the European Union. It's one solution for an Islamist populist economy built on piles of debt. The EU has a choice between dealing with the stream of migrants from Turkey moving to Europe. Or all of Turkey moving into Europe.



The West didn't create this problem. Its interventions, however misguided, attempted to manage it.



Islamic violence is not a response to Western colonialism. Not only does it predate it, but as many foreign policy experts are so fond of pointing out, its greatest number of casualties are Muslims. The West did not create Muslim dysfunction. And it is not responsible for it. Instead the dysfunction of the Muslim world keeps dragging the West in. Every Western attempt to ameliorate it, from humanitarian aid to peacekeeping operations, only opens up the West to take the blame for Islamic dysfunction.



The permanent refugee crisis is a structural problem caused by the conditions of the Muslim world.



The West can't solve the crisis at its source. Only Muslims can do that. And there are no easy answers. But the West can and should avoid being dragged down into the black hole of Muslim dysfunction.



Even Germany's Merkel learned that the number of refugees is not a finite quantity that can be relieved with a charitable gesture. It's the same escalating number of people that will show up if you start throwing bags of money out of an open window. And it's a number that no country can absorb.



Muslim civil wars will continue even if the West never intervenes in them because their part of the world is fundamentally unstable. These conflicts will lead to the displacement of millions of people. But even without violence, economic opportunism alone will drive millions to the West. And those millions carry with them the dysfunction of their culture that will make them a burden and a threat.



If Muslims can't reconcile their conflicts at home, what makes us think that they will reconcile them in Europe?


Instead of resolving their problems through migration, they only export them to new shores. The same outbursts of Islamic violence, xenophobia, economic malaise and unsustainable growth follow them across seas and oceans, across continents and countries.


Distance is no answer. Travel is no cure. Solving Syria will solve nothing. The Muslim world is full of fault lines. It's growing and it's running out of room to grow. We can't save Muslims from themselves. We can only save ourselves from their violence.

The permanent Muslim refugee crisis will never stop being our crisis unless we close the door.

Tuesday, October 10, 2017

Doklam Back Again : Are There Other Hidden Goals That China Aims To Achieve?

SOURCE:
https://idrw.org/doklam-back-again-are-there-other-hidden-goals-that-china-aims-to-achieve/




           Doklam Back Again

 : Are There Other Hidden Goals 

    That China Aims To Achieve?


The Ministry of External Affairs has denied that there is any change in the status quo at Doklam as agreed on August 25 paving way for "disengagement" at the disputed site between China and Bhutan.

Following the "disengagement" understanding, Indian troops came back to their posts in Doklam. Chinese troops too pulled back. But, they stayed put at about 800 metres from the site of stand-off.







There are reports suggesting that the People Liberation Army of China has been building up its strength in the vicinity of the Doklam. China has officially reiterated its sovereign claim over Doklam plateau. But, the Indian side has maintained that the status quo agreed in August has not been altered.







Meanwhile, Indian forces have also strengthened their presence in the high mountainous regions for better acclimatisation to keep themselves ready in the event of any Chinese adventure along the borders - near Doklam or any other part of about 3,800 km-long boundary.


WHY CHINA IS INSISTENT UPON DOKLAM?

Many observers believe that Doklam build up by the Chinese side is largely due to the domestic political compulsions of President Xi Jinping, who is facing a stiff opposition in the Communist Party of China from the loyalists of former President Jiang Zemin, who continues to wield significant influence in the ruling party.

Jinping is hoping for an unprecedented third term in 2022. But, for this to happen he needs the decision to be approved by the CPC Congress, which will be held from October 18 in Beijing. The loyalists of Zemin are said to be against the idea of re-electing Jinping for the third time.


However, another set of observers believe that Doklam is a plot in the larger geostrategic game of China which it is playing with India. China is harbouring an ambition replacing the US as the world leader. Its various infrastructure projects including One Belt One Road (OBOR) initiative and development ventures in many countries are part of that strategy.


INDIA, CHINA AS RIVALS

China finds India as a big stumbling rock in its global ambition. The hangover of 1962 war makes Beijing believe that if India is again demoralised militarily - not necessarily in direct conflict, it will establish China head and shoulder above India.

The military and economic gaps between India and China have grown wider over the last four-five decades. But, since the turn of the century, India has gained much confidence in dealing with China on both military and economic fronts. With Pakistan falling prey to the monster of terrorism that it created itself, China is the only rival of India for future.

Since the days of Atal Bihari Vajpayee government, India has focused on planning developmental projects in the areas bordering China. Manmohan Singh's government worked on improving connectivity in those areas. But, the process has gained a fresh momentum under the Narendra Modi government.

The attitude towards China seems to have changed in the government. Construction of dual use - military and civilian - infrastructure in Arunachal Pradesh and other states sharing boundaries with China have been stepped up.

Security cooperation with Japan, Vietnam, Australia and the US has deepened. India is expanding its reach in the Pacific region. Narendra Modi government has increased focus on the northeast region for strategic purposes. Narendra Modi has travelled to the region, including Arunachal Pradesh, a few times.

In 2016, the US ambassador was encouraged to tour Arunachal Pradesh. Six months later in February this year, Tibetan leader Dalai Lama was permitted to tour extensively in Arunachal Pradesh including Tawang. Dalai Lama's Tawang visit received wide publicity and huge participation by the local people. This all happened while China kept expressing its opposition to validate its claim over Arunachal Pradesh, which it describes as South Tibet.


MESSAGE FROM CHINA

Doklam is a territory that is disputed between Bhutan and China. Located near India, China and Bhutan tri-junction, Doklam is inhabited by Bhutan's pastoral communities and seasonally frequented by Tibetan herders. For long, China laid claim on entire Bhutan terming it part of Tibet.

Chinese logic is this: if Tibet forms part of China (India agrees to this), then all those regions that were part of Tibetan kingdom in the past legally belong to it. It was only during 1980s that China agreed to engage with Bhutan as an independent country.

India and Bhutan have a security arrangement under which New Delhi is bound to protect sovereign rights of Thimphu from external forces. China and Bhutan have border disputes in three pockets. It is believed that China wants to test if India would actually resort to military option to defend its ally.

Doklam stand-off happened as part of the Chinese scheme of testing India's willingness in standing by its allies. Doklam tension is also an attempt by China to create a divide between India and Bhutan in order to take advantage of the small Himalayan kingdom.


Some other countries like Nepal, Sri Lanka and the Maldives have traditionally looked to India for some degree of protection. China has been trying for years now to wean away these countries from India's security system.

Some other Southeast Asian countries like Vietnam, Malaysia and Indonesia have shown increasing inclination in having some sort of security ties with India. China has been vying for similar arrangements. But, China has turned out to be unreliable partner.

China has been heavily constructing infrastructure in border areas. In some cases, these activities have helped it expand its effective territorial control. China has captured Paracel and Spratly in the South China Sea region from Vietnam with massive construction on uninhabited islands.


China may be willing to replicate its South China Sea experiment in Doklam. If China succeeds in its achieving its goals of creating wedge between India and its long standing ally Bhutan over Doklam, it may be looking to execute the same template elsewhere. So, far India has proved an equal match in geo-strategic maneuvering by China.


Sunday, October 8, 2017

DOKLAM : China Expands Road In Doklam

SOURCE:
https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/just-10-km-from-last-doklam-stand-off-china-works-on-a-road-again-1759103






     [ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2e8HzoKA0ds ]





[  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V54OnSWg-1k ]




With 500 Soldiers On Guard, China Expands                                 Road In Doklam

                                          BY

                                 Aby Vishnu Som 




HIGHLIGHTS



  1. China starts expandig road in disputed Doklam Plateau
  2. 500 soldiers accompanying construction workers
  3. New construction in same area that India holds highly sensitive









Thwarted in its last attempt, China has now shifted its 

unused road construction material North and East of 

the Doklam face-off site.


Saturday, October 7, 2017

JAI JAWAN MODI BALWAN SWACH BHARAT MODI MAHAN

SOURCE:
http://www.hindustantimes.com/punjab/a-soldier-should-wield-the-gun-not-broom-veterans/story-gMKmdczHtee1Nwun3LkQDN.html











                         JAI   JAWAN MODI BALWAN

          SWACH  BHARAT MODI MAHAN















 


              A Soldier Should Wield the Gun,Not Broom: 

                     Veterans on PMO’s clean-up Orders



Debate over PMO asking the ministry of defence 

to clean up the waste left behind by tourists in 

high-altitude locations is only getting more lively



From an online petition collecting signatures against the move to furore on WhatsApp and Twitter, the debate over Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) asking the ministry of defence (MoD) to clean up the waste left behind by tourists in high-altitude locations is only getting more lively.
The latest argument is that when the Sri Lankan tourism ministry mooted a similar proposal to its armed forces, they refused, saying their soldiers won’t touch garbage.
A former army commander, who requested anonymity, said he had no bones to pick with the order if it is part of a national effort. “In the 1960s, the armed forces used to grow wheat and rice in vacant areas and even the bungalows as part of the ‘grow more food campaign’, but the ministry must clarify whether the army will do it physically or it will get funds for it.”
But he was quick to add that if the rumour that it was part of the central government’s efforts to get the pilgrim places cleaned was true, he would be very offended.
Lt Gen Harwant Singh (retd) feels the order is downright humiliating. “Soldiering is all about pride, such an order will lower the self-esteem of a soldier. It is unfortunate that our chiefs don’t stand up to such diktats,” he said, adding that there was a difference between helping out in an emergency and wielding the broom to make up for somebody else’s inefficiency.
There were others who said the order stemmed from the misplaced notion that the armed forces had nothing to do during peace time. Calling it an “idiotic decision” in view of the threat the country faces from two sides, Col Anil Raina (retd) said the army is busy every month of the year. “From January to March, we are doing in-house training and preparing for the next nine months. Then there is field firing, followed by inspections where a unit is told whether it is war ready or not.”
Agreeing with him, the former army commander said a soldier has to account for every hour in his day. “From training and refresher courses to administrative work, he is kept physically and mentally busy. It is peace time that prepares you for war.”
Col Raina said a soldier is so busy even during peace that if you were to ask him how many nights he gets to sleep, he will reply “2- 3 nights a week”.
Brig Baljit Singh (retd) of War Decorated India, however, chose to interpret the order more cautiously. “I think the PMO implies that the army will get the work done, not that it will do it physically.” The officer went on to explain that the chief executive officer of the cantonment board, who is an employee of the defence ministry, has both staff and funds at his disposal. “He can use both to clean up areas in high altitude with scanty civil population.”
But most veterans found the order hard to swallow. Slamming it as “very stupid” Brig Harwant Singh (retd) of the Indian Ex-Servicemen Movement, bristled, “The army does not need any ‘swacchta abhiyan’. They are asking us to clean up. It amounts to gross ill-treatment of the soldier. Don’t reduce him to a safai worker.”
Seconding him, Brig Onkar Singh Goraya (retd) said the PMO can boost the cleanliness campaign by sending his people to cantonments for a tutorial in cleanliness. “Visit any military station and you won’t find a brick out of place. We do the job with minimum effort. Learn from us, don’t hand us the broom.”