SOURCE:
http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-we-are-part-of-the-sarasvati-civilisation-1123238
PROJECT SARASWATI
http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-we-are-part-of-the-sarasvati-civilisation-1123238
PROJECT SARASWATI
‘We are part of the Sarasvati Civilisation ’’
Mon, 24 Sep 2007-
S Kalyanaraman, director of the privately-funded Sarasvati Research Centre in Chennai, spoke to DNA on the Archaeological Survey of India’s findings.
S Kalyanaraman, a PhD in Public Administration, University of Philippines, and director of the privately-funded Sarasvati Research Centre in Chennai, spoke on the Archaeological Survey of India’s findings, and why he thinks the mythical river mentioned in the Rig Veda is none other than the Ghaggar.
--------------------------------
The ASI conducted excavations envisaged in the Sarasvati heritage project with its own money. What are the findings that you know of?
Bhirrana is a remarkable excavation. The discoveries there point to the possibility of identifying the Vedic people. This site shows that the origins of civilisation are in the Sarasvati river valley, circa 6000 BC. There are as yet unexcavated sites which are larger than Harappa or Mohenjodaro in Bhatinda, Gurnikalan, and Lakhmirwala.
If that is the case, then why does not the ASI go ahead with these plans?
They should. Unfortunately, Jaipal Reddy (information minister) and Ambika Soni (the culture minister) assisted by Sitaram Yechury (of the CPM) have killed Jagmohan's systematic approach. A section of ASI officials who believe in the Sarasvati are quietly working on it by calling it Ghaggar in their proposals.
Has the river been found?
The river has been found, foot by foot; unfortunately ASI doesn't talk to the ministry of water resources and the regional remote sensing services centre at Jodhpur (ISRO) to get the details of the scientific seminar on the subject. Ghaggar is Sarasvati.
The ASI should read the brilliant work by the most eminent Himalayan ecologist, Prof KS Valdiya, ‘Sarasvati: The River That Disappeared’. It is a brilliant scientific document which can provide a basis for a journey into the past along the Sarasvati river basin of periods prior to 2000, before the common era.
But there is considerable dispute about whether Sarasvati is the lost river of the Harappan civilisation. Isn’t it?
Romila Thapar (historian) asked KS Valdiya, “OK, professor, you have found the river, but how do you say she is Sarasvati?" The professor replied: "OK, madam, you look like a woman, but how do you know you are Romila? Our ancient texts, our mothers are emphatic that a mighty river Sarasvati drained in Bharatam."
So then, does this mean the Indus Valley civilisation and the Vedic civilisation or Sarasvati civilisation are one?
Yes. Indus valley was so called because the site Mohenjodaro was on the river Sindhu (Indus). Now that over 2,000 of the 2,600 sites are found to be on the river Sarasvati, the civilisation should be called the Sarasvati civilisation. It is a continuum into Bharatiya sabhyataa (culture). Every Bharatiya is a child of Sarasvati ancestors. I have proved it in eight volumes. Let Yechury and company read them and come back to me for a debate. ISRO's map of river Sarasvati adorns the PM's office and is shown to foreign dignitaries with pride.
Do you think that the ASI is an ideologically divided institution?
Yes. Ideologically driven politicians control ASI. The river's presence is so dominant, that Sarasvati cannot be wished away by mere name-change. Ghaggar is river Sarasvati's ancient channel.
S Kalyanaraman, a PhD in Public Administration, University of Philippines, and director of the privately-funded Sarasvati Research Centre in Chennai, spoke on the Archaeological Survey of India’s findings, and why he thinks the mythical river mentioned in the Rig Veda is none other than the Ghaggar.
--------------------------------
The ASI conducted excavations envisaged in the Sarasvati heritage project with its own money. What are the findings that you know of?
Bhirrana is a remarkable excavation. The discoveries there point to the possibility of identifying the Vedic people. This site shows that the origins of civilisation are in the Sarasvati river valley, circa 6000 BC. There are as yet unexcavated sites which are larger than Harappa or Mohenjodaro in Bhatinda, Gurnikalan, and Lakhmirwala.
If that is the case, then why does not the ASI go ahead with these plans?
They should. Unfortunately, Jaipal Reddy (information minister) and Ambika Soni (the culture minister) assisted by Sitaram Yechury (of the CPM) have killed Jagmohan's systematic approach. A section of ASI officials who believe in the Sarasvati are quietly working on it by calling it Ghaggar in their proposals.
Has the river been found?
The river has been found, foot by foot; unfortunately ASI doesn't talk to the ministry of water resources and the regional remote sensing services centre at Jodhpur (ISRO) to get the details of the scientific seminar on the subject. Ghaggar is Sarasvati.
The ASI should read the brilliant work by the most eminent Himalayan ecologist, Prof KS Valdiya, ‘Sarasvati: The River That Disappeared’. It is a brilliant scientific document which can provide a basis for a journey into the past along the Sarasvati river basin of periods prior to 2000, before the common era.
But there is considerable dispute about whether Sarasvati is the lost river of the Harappan civilisation. Isn’t it?
Romila Thapar (historian) asked KS Valdiya, “OK, professor, you have found the river, but how do you say she is Sarasvati?" The professor replied: "OK, madam, you look like a woman, but how do you know you are Romila? Our ancient texts, our mothers are emphatic that a mighty river Sarasvati drained in Bharatam."
So then, does this mean the Indus Valley civilisation and the Vedic civilisation or Sarasvati civilisation are one?
Yes. Indus valley was so called because the site Mohenjodaro was on the river Sindhu (Indus). Now that over 2,000 of the 2,600 sites are found to be on the river Sarasvati, the civilisation should be called the Sarasvati civilisation. It is a continuum into Bharatiya sabhyataa (culture). Every Bharatiya is a child of Sarasvati ancestors. I have proved it in eight volumes. Let Yechury and company read them and come back to me for a debate. ISRO's map of river Sarasvati adorns the PM's office and is shown to foreign dignitaries with pride.
Do you think that the ASI is an ideologically divided institution?
Yes. Ideologically driven politicians control ASI. The river's presence is so dominant, that Sarasvati cannot be wished away by mere name-change. Ghaggar is river Sarasvati's ancient channel.
No comments:
Post a Comment