Showing posts with label 7 CPC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 7 CPC. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 21, 2017

7 CPC FOR ARMED FORCES = Will Soldiers Get Pay Commission Benefits?

SOURCE
http://linkis.com/thestatesman.com/opi/lmqe1











Will Soldiers Get Pay Commission Benefits?


                                   BY

                          Harsha Kakar 

















  • March 21, 2017
  • New Delhi
It has been almost a year since the pay commission was implemented for all central government employees. The initial report of the commission had itself hurt military pride. Apart from lowering its status, it had also reduced its allowances, ensuring those occupying plush offices in secure zones in Guwahati from the IAS and allied services would draw better allowances than soldiers deployed in the highest battlefield of the world, the Siachen Glacier. The pay commission had created a rift between various central services, especially the military and the bureaucracy. The military’s demand has always remained one, status quo with other services. The military feels  it was the bureaucracy that was responsible for lowering its status to that of the Central Armed Police Forces (CAPF), well below the IAS, IPS and other allied services. Such was the anguish across the military that service chiefs were compelled to jointly reject orders for issuing directions for the pay commission’s implementation. Such an action has been unprecedented in the history of Independent India.
The hue and cry rose to such levels in media and social media circles that the Prime Minister had to intervene and refer the pay commission of the military to a separate anomalies panel under the Department of Personnel and Training (DOPT). The DOPT functions under the PMO. The PM's directions were issued despite orders by the Defence Minister to service chiefs to accept the report as released, while the anomalies could be handled subsequently. 
Had the service chiefs accepted the directions of the defence minister, not a single anomaly would have been rectified. Anomalies of the fifth and sixth pay commission continue to remain unresolved; expecting the anomalies of the seventh to be cleared would be farfetched. Had the pay commission not been released till a viable and satisfactory solution was arrived at, involving all affected parties, the present scenario of one service still awaiting its release would never have arisen. 
It has been over six months since it was referred to the anomalies commission and there are still no inputs of when it is likely to be announced. If it takes a department under the PMO over six months to implement his directions, then there are serious doubts on what can be expected. While every other central service has enjoyed the benefits, the military quietly remains hopeful. The announcement of elections in five states and the kicking in of the code of conduct made any release of the final report unlikely till the announcement of results. However, everything should have been concluded, the findings discussed with service chiefs and the report ready for release. No inputs on the same seem to flow till date. Similar is the case with another anomalies commission, concerning allowances, under the secretary of finance. Why should there be a delay now? The elections concluded almost a fortnight ago, results were announced, new governments have assumed power, hence the code of conduct no longer exists. 
The Justice Reddy commission report on the OROP was submitted to the finance ministry in October last year. It was for the government to study and announce its final recommendations. To continue to keep the issue alive, the agitation by the veterans continues at Jantar Mantar. Again, there is absolute silence on the part of the government. This raises the question of whether it is serious on implementing it, or was it just a ploy to garner votes in elections.
Both anomalies commissions have no representative of the military, the main affected party. It has members of other central services who are tasked to provide justice to the military which in reality may never happen. Is the government hoping that by delaying its release, it could push the military leadership to accept a midway mark, by which it could continue to maintain the protocol gap created by the original release? If that is the intention, then it may be a wrong action, as it would lower the standing of the chiefs in the eyes of the rank and file of the military and enhance the divide between the military and the bureaucracy as also within the military. The government is aware that there is unlikely to be any official bickering as military rules and regulations prohibit it. 
Casualties in J and K continue to rise, while the summer has yet to commence. Army deployment would increase as anti-militant operations take centre stage. Morale in the army needs to be at an all-time high, especially as local support to anti-national elements is on the rise and encounters are only going to increase. One of the most important ingredients of high morale is pay and allowances and appropriate status and respect. 
The military suffers a shortage of over nine thousand officers. Degraded status and an ignoring attitude would never help in making the service attractive for the masses. A change at the top, with the defence minister having moved to Goa, would stall the process of Non-Functional Upgradation (NFU), as also pushing for an early release of the pay commission. A temporary defence minister or a new appointee would require requisite time to understand the problems and grievances of the service, before attempting to address them. 
The Prime Minister's words of praise in his speeches or spending time with troops on Diwali, are insufficient. It is time for him to act and openly prove the genuineness of his words, release the pay commission, clearing major anomalies. It is equally surprising that the opposition can question the Prime Minister’s silence on hate crimes in the US, but refuse to question the government on delay in releasing the military’s pay commission. 
(The writer is a retired Major General of the Indian Army.)

Thursday, January 5, 2017

OROP :General Bipin Rawat Appeals Army Veterans to call off OROP Protest

SOURCE:
http://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ani/general-bipin-rawat-appeals-army-veterans-to-call-off-protest-over-orop-117010301282_1.html



General Bipin Rawat Appeals Army Veterans

             to call off 

           OROP Protest





He adds that demands related to OROP 

have been fulfilled up to certain extent  


    [ General  in  'INDIAN POLITICAL' 

context "certain extent" is a vauge term. ]



ANI  |  New Delhi 


Newly appointed Chief of Army Staff General 
on Tuesday appealed the army veterans to call off their protest over One Rank One Pension (OROP) scheme while stating that government is trying its best to provide full assistance to them.

"I would like to appeal our veterans who are sitting on a protest at Delhi's Jantar Mantar to go back to their home. The government is mulling over the issue and trying to give our veterans full assistance," General Rawat told ANI.

"As far as the is concerned, our army chief veterans and ex-servicemen would have felt that the kind of assistance that they were expecting was not given. But I would like to say that our demand has been fulfilled to a certain extent," he added.

Highlighting the initiatives taken by the Defence Ministry, Union Defence Minister earlier in the day said that around 99 per cent of the eligible cases under the will be settled by January 2017, adding that around 13,000 cases are sent to pension disbursement authorities.

Speaking at the Ministry of Defence's 'Swachhta Pakhwada' event, Parrikar further said that during last two and a half years, the ministry through ex-servicemen cell has been able to settle many of the issues.

"is one of the important issues. So far we have already paid the pension on the first or second week of January. These cases should be in total finality, 13000 cases are sent to pension disbursement authorities. Almost 99 percent of the eligible cases will be settled probably by January, one percent is settled yet as we are trying to trace them," Parrikar said.

The scheme, announced in September 2015, is meant to ensure equal pension to servicemen who retired on the same rank and after the same duration of service, regardless of the year of retirement.

However, retired soldiers have been alleging [?!!?} that the government has not addressed their concerns fully about the disparity in pension payments.



One Rank One Pension: Important Frequently Asked Question (FAQ) with model calculation by PCDA (Pension)


 Enhanced Rate of Ordinary Family Pension i.r.o. Pre 2006 Armed Forces family pensioners - Table of Enhanced Pension


 Daul Family Pension - Continuance to Disabled Children after their marriage and withholding of 10% Gratuity: PCDA Circular No. 106



























Sunday, September 11, 2016

7CPC : THE TARGET IS IN SELF DESTRUCT MODE

SOURCE:
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Forces-Stall-pay-revision-till-anomalies-removed/articleshow/54273957.cms
         
      http://www.tribuneindia.com/news/nation/armed-forces-reject-pay-panel/293509.html                

                 


Its  time the three chiefs resigned in protest against the step motherly treatment being meted out to the service and ex-servicemen Defense  Minister has NO say. The Finance Minister has deep rooted disliking for the forces.  The PM has NO time.       

                   -Ashok Wadhwa       


                IT IS NOW OR NEVER


The armed forces have upped the ante in their ongoing struggle for resolution of "core anomalies" in their salary packages by asking the Centre to keep in "abeyance" the implementation of the 7th Central Pay Commission (CPC) for them.  

In an embarrassment to the Modi government, the armed forces have rejected the salary and emoluments recommended by the Seventh Central Pay Commission, pleading that its implementation be put on hold in view of the “unresolved anomalies” that lowered the status of the forces vis-à-vis their counterparts in the police and the civil administration.


The Ministry of Defence had issued the notification on September 6 after taking into account a letter by the three services chiefs on the issue of pay parity, among other things. This notification was exclusively for the forces.

In the past 24 hours, the Army, the Navy and the Air Force have issued separate letters to inform senior commanders and the troops about the decision of the top brass.

The Chiefs of Staff Committee had met on September 7 to discuss the issue. Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar is expected to take a decision on the matter on Monday. 

Earlier, the notification for enhanced pay for the forces had been held up as the issues raised by the three services were being studied.

The main “anomaly” is that the formula adopted for determining the basic pay for the armed forces is different from the one for other Central government employees. As a result, in each rank the service officers have been awarded lower pay scales.

In March, the MoD had told an empowered panel that the status, pay and allowances of the armed forces be kept above the other “fighting” arms of the government




          UNBRIDGEABLE MISTRUST  



AN AVERAGE MEMBER OF FAUJI FRATERNITY NO LONGER TRUSTS THE GOVERNANCE OF THOSE IN POWER

IT IS TIME FOR THE POWERS WHO HAPPENS TO BE IN REIN TO PONDER OVER


Kautilya discretely but firmly reminded the king that his safety and security as well as of his empire depend on the trust and sacrifice of his soldiers.
  “The Mauryan soldier does not enrich the Royal treasuries nor fills the Royal granaries. He does not carry out trade and commerce nor produce scholars, litterateurs, artistes, artisans, sculptors, architects, craftsmen, doctors and administrators. He does not build roads and ramparts nor dig wells and reservoirs. He does not do any of this directly.

            “The soldier only and merely ensures that the tax, tribute and revenue collectors travel forth and return safely; that the farmer tills, harvests, stores and markets his produce unafraid of pillage; that the trader, merchant and financier function and travel across the length and breadth of the realm unmolested; that the savant, sculptor, maestro and mentor create works of art, literature, philosophy and astrology in quietitude; that the architect designs and builds his Vaastus without tension; that the tutor and the priest teach and preach in peace; that the rishis meditate in wordless silence; that the doctor invents cures and medicines undisturbed; that the mason and bricklayer work unhindered; that the mother and the wife go about their chores and bring up children in harmony and tranquility; that the cattle graze freely without being lifted or stolen.

            “Pataliputra reposes each night in peaceful comfort, O King, secure in the belief that the distant borders of Magadha are inviolate and the interiors are safe and secure, thanks only to the Mauryan Army standing vigil with naked swords and eyes peeled for action, day and night, in weather fair and foul, all eight praharas (round the clock), quite unmindful of personal discomfort and hardship, all through the year, year after year.
            “While the citizenry of the State contributes to see that the State prospers and flourishes, the soldier guarantees it continues to EXIST as a State! To this man, O Rajadhiraja, you owe a debt: please, therefore, see to it, on your own, that the soldier continuously gets his dues in every form and respect, be they his needs or his wants, for he is not likely to ask for them himself.”
 
            Then Kautilya, known also as Chanakya gave his king this blunt warning: “The day the soldier has to demand his dues will be a sad day for Magadha for then, on that day, you will have lost all moral sanction to be King!”





“In effect, military officers, who were earlier equated a notch above with the IPS,IFS, Indian Forest services & IAS, have been reduced to the level of the paramilitary ( in fact with HOME GUARDS " said another officer.






                         

Wednesday, August 17, 2016

7 CPC : Pay Panel shock: Male Youth may give Armed Forces a Miss [ Only Volunteer Miss may join ]


SOURCE:   http://www.hindustantimes.com/punjab/pay-panel-shock-youth-may-give-armed-forces-a-miss/story-d2Xc47cfOtf59CwlsJFUGJ.html




                                    [   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6VnAFw4ar0E  ]



Published on Jul 1, 2016
 
The 7th pay commission recommendations which the Government has accepted has not found the favour with range of beneficiaries. The most serious opposition comes from the country's three armed services. On a range of critical issues they believe they have been considered and also denied what they should have got. This episode of To The Point discuss on the principle reasons why the Military is upset and why the Government needs to think again on 7th pay commission recommendations.

India Today Television marks the entry of the nation’s most credible name in journalism - India Today into news television. Powered by a future-ready look and backed with the 40 year legacy of the India Today brand, the channel addresses the news consumption habits of an evolved digital-savvy audience while staying true to the journalistic principles of the India Today Group.


 


Pay Panel shock: Male Youth may give Armed Forces a Miss [ Only Volunteer Miss may join ] 

Chandigarh
Aug 14, 2016


A once in decade expectation among the central government employees concerning revision of salaries and allowances has come as a shock especially to the armed forces of the country. The government’s consistency to short shift the nation’s last bastion, though, is well established, the partisan treatment meted out smacks of a bid to ultimately finish the martial legacy of the nation. I term this conscious bilk as an abysmal lack of constructive vision. Let’s analyse the bag of goodies that the 7th Pay Commission has doled out to the services.


Separate Pay Matrix 
 
By outlining separate pay matrices for civilians and soldiers, the pay commission has announced the discrimination that hithertofore was a veiled conjecture.

The evident mismatch of increments between the civil and military have shocked the fraternity.

To elaborate, a sepoy getting recruited at the same time as his civilian counterpart will serve till the age of 37 as compared to a cool 60 years of the latter and thus stock as many more increments thereby drawing a fatter pension cheque.


The struggle and consequent acceptance of one rank one pension (OROP), though, diluted did not go down well with the babus is a well known fact. They have ensured a similar status for themselves. We do not grudge them that albeit the clause of the OROP regarding non- admissibility to premature retirees henceforth, shockingly does not apply to these privileged beings.


Of Allowances

The issue of allowances as enunciated by the commission, though, still not okayed by the government is a typical ‘airhead’ action. Can you imagine a soldier serving at Siachen getting one third of allowance of a babu serving at Guwahati.[Capitol City of a State ] The chairman of the commission during a media interaction has rubbed salt to the wounds by stating that an attractive allowance will motivate the IAS to willingly serve in difficult areas. Well done sir!

[ IT IS A DIRECT OPEN & SHUT CASE OF PAYING BRIBERY BY NOTHING LESS THAN "PAY COMMISSON ITSELF TO INDUCE GOVERNMENT STAFF TO WORK  ]
As witnessed during the Jat agitation in Haryana, these fellows don’t bat an eyelid to requisition armed forces in case of crisis and themselves melt in the oblivion. They are even swifter in passing the buck in disturbed areas.


The Diversionary Cheap Gimmicks

In order to cloud the big picture, the pay panel recommended doing away with entitled rations for officers. To undo the legitimate award after 30 years of its grant, shocked the armed forces as they could not fathom the wacky idea. Well, absurd that it was, obviously could not see the light of day. But, the deft members of the panel succeed in diverting our attention.


Coming back to my earlier point of lack of constructive vision by the government, the popular caption in an advertisement by armed forces headquarters to attract young people to its fold has consistently been, “Do you have it in you?”, a motivating call to the youth of the nation. During the HT youth forum, a discussion on the youth of today relegating military as their career choice was an eye opener.

A discerning youth is aware of the eroding status of a fauji. Reduced salaries, allowances, erosion in status and an apathetic attitude of ‘powers that be’ is sure to sound a death knell to the dreams of youngsters to don uniform.



avnishrms59@gmail.com
(The writer is a retired army officer who resides in Chandigarh)





 

7 CPC: ADM & MORAL -ARMED FORCES DISCRIMINATED AGAINST

SOURCE:
http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/academic-interest/armed-forces-discriminated-against-left-out-in-the-cold-by-ias-ips-government-must-explain-why-protect-soldiers/?utm_source=TOInewHP_TILwidget&utm_campaign=TOInewHP&utm_medium=Widget_Stry



                     BHAINSE KE AAGE  'BEEN BAJANA'                










‘ARMED FORCES DISCRIMINATED AGAINST, LEFT OUT IN THE COLD BY IAS,IPS ........GOVERNMENT MUST EXPLAIN WHY,PROTECT SOLDIERS '

        in Academic Interest
 
 
 
August 17, 2016,
 
 
Despite the 7th Pay Commission’s award which gave 33 lakh government servants and 14 lakh defence personnel (with 54 lakh retirees and 18 lakh veterans) salary and pension hikes from August 1, 2016, defence forces personnel and veterans have been angry. Independent Rajya Sabha MP Rajeev Chandrasekhar is a member of Parliament’s Standing Committee on Defence and tells Nalin Mehta why he thinks armed forces have been treated unfairly and why this matters
 
 
 
 
 
 


What are the armed forces’ problems with the 7th Pay Commission award?

All public servants are not the same. Those in the armed forces who serve, sacrifice and give their lives and limbs at times are a different kind of public servant. The angst of the armed forces, which is slowly converting into anger, goes back to 3rd  Pay Commission.

It has less to do with the exact money and more to do with the status of armed forces vis-à-vis other central government services. This status is not like politicians understand it or about lal battis but about status in the hierarchy of service and command.


In what way has the status of armed forces gone down?

It is a reality that over the last 15-20 years the armed forces have slowly declined in stature and relative importance and positioning vis-à-vis police and IAS. Most of the angst of the military – serving and veterans – has to do with this. There is absolutely no doubt that IAS and IPS because of their proximity to the political powers have over successive pay commissions given themselves sweeter and sweeter deals and left the military out in the cold. This is indisputable because the military has never been represented in these pay commissions.

Any normal Indian citizen who has even the remotest feeling of care for armed forces will ask why?


Is it true that there are allowance anomalies: like a DIG of paramilitary forces serving in Shillong will get an extra Rs 73,000 but an Army Brigadier there will get zero allowance?

That is precisely the point. In all these cases, they will be serving in close proximity. In Leh for example a Brigadier and DIG would be serving in the unified command. Why would you take a Brigadier or a soldier and put him down in the hierarchy below what his predecessors in the armed forces were? What is the logic?

If government has an explanation for this they should make it. If IAS or pay commission has a reason for this why are they not putting it out in public domain?


This is about much more than just preserving the civilian-military balance?

We in India are very proud that the military is subordinate to the civilian and political administrative hierarchy but subordinate does not mean disadvantaged or subservient. Why are we making this institution of armed forces get a feeling that they are getting discriminated against?


What are the national security implications?

The risk profile of our nation is only worsening. There is asymmetric warfare imposed on us. You want a motivated armed forces not a group of people who feel they are being done in.


There are grouses like non-functional upgrade (NFU) given to civilian bureaucrats and three extra increments which defence forces don’t get? Why?

There are no answers. For every question that an armed forces man or family asks, the nation owes an answer. The answer need not always be yes. But we must give an answer – 46 anomalies from 6th Pay Commission and 36 from 7th Pay Commission remain unresolved and there is no legitimate answer given on why their requests are being turned down. This is something government and ministry of defence must learn to do.


Are legitimate demands of military put aside in name of civilian supremacy because politicians don’t necessarily understand the detail?

The power of a bureaucrat to say no is not a unilateral power with no accountability. It is okay to say no, but you have to accompany that with a why.

Is there an appetite to find a solution?

There is an appetite to do right by armed forces in Parliament and government. Our armed forces should not feel for one minute that they are taking bullets despite an ungrateful nation. The occupation of armed forces has a much higher risk profile than their peers. This should be recognised in the pay matrix. I am sure nobody in Delhi will oppose it.

On one rank one pension, nobody ever said no, except that nobody understood how to do it. It took the PM and defence minister to cut through the problems and in the end you got something. The same thing must be done now.


About the Author


Nalin Mehta
            
Nalin Mehta is an award-winning social scientist, journalist and author. He is consulting editor with The Times of India and editor of the international journal South Asian History and Culture (Routledge) as well as the Routledge 'South Asian History and Culture' book series. He has previously been managing editor, Headlines Today (India Today Group), adjunct professor at Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore, and held senior positions with the Global Fund in Geneva, Switzerland, and UNAIDS. He has also held fellowships at National University of Singapore, Australian National University, Canberra, La Trobe University, Melbourne, and the International Olympics Museum, Lausanne. Mehta's books include 'Behind a Billion Screens: What Television Tells Us About Modern India', a critically acclaimed national bestseller long-listed for Business Book of the Year by Tata Literary Live 2015; ‘India on Television: How Satellite Channels Have Changed the Way We Think and Act', which won the 2009 Asian Publishing Award for Best Book; the best-selling 'Sellotape Legacy: Delhi and the Commonwealth Games', and a critically acclaimed social history of Indian sport, 'Olympics: The India Story' (co-authored). His edited books include 'Television in India: Satellites, Politics and Cultural Change' and 'Gujarat Beyond Gandhi: Identity, Conflict and Society' (co-edited)
 

  ___________________________________________________
                  
                        PROVERBIAL SOLUTION          

  THROW SOMETHING

               - BHONKTE     KE  AAGEY 
            SUKHI  ROTI KE TOOKRE  PHENKO
                   CHUP KAAR JAAEGA
________________________________________________________

                           CRUX OF THE PROBLEM



 
Major General Mrinal Suman
 
 
 
India’s Ministry of Defence (MoD) is unique in most aspects. No other country can boast of such a set-up. Not convinced? Read on.
 
 
 
Responsibility for India’s national defence is discharged through Ministry of Defence ( MoD ),  which provides the policy framework and wherewithal to the armed forces. MoD has five Secretaries, heading different departments. Here is a closer look at their functioning
 
 
________________________________________________
 
    HALWAI'S DREAM STRUCTURE
 
 WILL BE HALWAI SHOP ONLY         
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
_______________________________________
 
Department of Defence (DoD)
 
 
According to the Allocation of Business Rules of the government, the Defence Secretary heads DoD that is responsible for the defence of India and every part thereof, including preparation for defence and all such acts as may be conducive in times of war.
 
 In other words, he is tasked to
 
ensure the defence of the country.
 
 Surprised?
 
 
 Yes, it is his responsibility and not
 
 that of the Service Chiefs.
 
 
For such an onerous responsibility, it is natural to expect a highly experienced defence expert/veteran to be occupying the chair. After all, to ensure defence of the country (including preparation and execution) is no routine job. But MoD is different. Any bureaucrat can foot the bill, even if he cannot differentiate between a mortar and a howitzer or a rocket and a missile.
 
India has had Defence Secretaries whose earlier service had been limited to Rural Development, Panchayati Raj, Fisheries and Animal Husbandry. Most do not know even the basics of defence imperatives. To mask their ignorance and inadequacy, they resort to the time-tested expedient of deferring decision-making.
 
 
India is the only country that
 
 considers experience in fisheries or
 
handlooms to be good enough to
 
equip a bureaucrat to handle
 
 defence of India.
 
 
 
          No wonder we claim
 
         ‘Mera Bharat Mahan’.
 
 
 
Department of Defence Production (DDP)
 
 
Development of indigenous defence industry is DDP’s prime responsibility. Although DDP has a vast domain of 39 ordnance factories and 9 defence public sector undertakings, the performance of DDP has been pathetic to say the least. It is solely responsible for the current pitiable state of the indigenous defence industry, wherein India remains dependent on imports for 70 percent of its defence requirements.
 
 
The world over, promotion of defence industry is considered to be a highly specialised assignment. However, India is an exception. Any bureaucrat can be appointed as Secretary DDP.  Some come with no experience of industry or defence. Their incompetence manifests itself in their prejudiced and blinkered approach towards the private sector. Blocking the entry of the private sector to ensure regular flow of orders to the public sector becomes their sole mission. Instead of exploiting the enormous technological prowess of the private sector, DDP impedes its participation in defence production. 
 
 
In all ‘Buy and Make’ cases, DDP always nominates a public sector unit to receive technology for indigenous production. Instead of absorbing technology, most units choose the easier path of assembling imported sub-assemblies and selling to the services at a huge profit. The case of TATRA vehicles exposed the rot that has set in. Rather than undertaking the onerous task of manufacturing, most public sector units have become traders of imported systems under DDP’s patronage
 
 
 
Utter failure of DDP can be gauged from the fact that India has acquired the dubious distinction of being the largest importer of conventional weapons in the world with 14 percent of the global share.
 
Some achievement after seven decades of independence! DDP ought to be ashamed of it.
 
 
               But, we still have the audacity to claim .
 
 
          ‘Mera Bharat Mahan’.
 
 
 
Defence Research and Development
 
 Organisation (DRDO)
 
 
 
DRDO has 52 laboratories in multiple disciplines. It employs over 5,000 scientists and about 25,000 other scientific, technical and supporting personnel. The track record of DRDO is abysmal to say the least – a chronicle of false claims, tall promises, inexplicable delays and sub-optimal products. It has the unenviable reputation of never developing any equipment conforming to the parameters in the promised time-frame. Some claim to infamy!
 
 
Although DRDO’s annual budget is close to Rs 14,000 crore, its total success is limited to the replication of some imported products (commonly called ‘reverse engineering’ and ‘indigenisation’). Time and cost overruns are taken for granted. The history of three key projects (Arjun tank, Light Combat Aircraft and Kavery aero engine) undertaken by DRDO is a true indicator of the gross inadequacy that afflicts it.
 
 
Failure to perform its primary task of developing weapon systems has forced DRDO to delve into bizarre areas to justify its existence. Many will be shocked to learn that DRDO expends defence funds on projects like developing new breeds of angora rabbits, collecting newer varieties of orchids and identifying sharpest chillies.
 
________________________________________________
 
AUTHOR HAS MISSED THE BIGGEST CONTRIBUTION OF DRDO  " HALF PAGE ADVETISEMENTS IN NATIONAL NEWS PAPERS OFFERING "SEWERAGE SYSTEMS FOR TOWNSHIPS"
_________________________________________________
 
No other country can boast of such defence R&D, except
 
 
          ‘Mera Bharat Mahan’.
 
 
 
 
Department of Ex-serviceman
 
 Welfare (DESW)


         [ A THORN IN ROSES]

I was so sure,
But now I'm confused.
I thought I knew what I wanted,
But then you came and ruined my plans.
And I wouldn't have it any other way.
 
 
 
DESW deals with all resettlement, welfare and pensionary matters of ex-servicemen. Strangely, not a single serving or retired soldier has been posted to it. It is totally manned by bureaucrats. Interestingly, India cannot have the Minority Commission without minority members or Women’s Commission without women; but it can have DESW without ex-servicemen. Welfare of retired soldiers has been entrusted to the people who have never faced a bullet and who know little about the challenges faced by the retired soldiers. Hence, they cannot be faulted for their complete lack of empathy.

 
A comparison of DESW with the US Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) will be enlightening. All the top officers of DVA are ex-servicemen. It is headed by the Secretary of Veterans

Affairs, Robert A. McDonald, a veteran of 82nd Airborne Division. Most of the subordinate functionaries also possess extensive military experience. They appreciate that soldiering is a unique profession with challenging convolutions.

 
DESW

has acquired notoriety as the first barricade of bureaucratic negativity. Most proposals get rejected at DESW level itself. Instead of looking after the welfare of veterans and standing up for their rights/entitlements, DESW contests every judicial verdict that goes in favour of ex-servicemen, war-widows and even war casualties. As a result, troops and veterans view DESW as an antagonistic entity.

India must be the only country

where MoD does not enjoy the trust

of its veterans.

                 What a sad state of affairs in

       ‘Mera Bharat Mahan’.


 
Defence Finance Division (Def Fin)
 
Defence Finance is responsible to examine all defence matters having a financial bearing; render financial advice; assist in the formulation and implementation of all schemes/proposals involving expenditure; and assist in the formulation and implementation of defence plans. In other words, they are custodians of government funds and oversee all defence expenditure. 

 
Notwithstanding the colourful taxonomy of Defence Financial Advisors, Defence Finance officials are ill-equipped to provide any financial advice. Most are graduates in subjects like Sanskrit, English Literature and History. As they are not familiar with even the basics of finance or economics, it is unfair to expect them to grasp minutiae of financial imperatives. How can officials who know nothing of finance and are totally ignorant of defence issues contribute to the evolution of a sound defence finance plan?

 
What to talk of rendering advice, Defence Finance officials are incapable of even doing their basic job of account keeping. In March 2016, the Defence Minister shocked the nation by revealing that India’s USD 3 billion were lying forgotten with the US government for years, without earning any interest. Worse, India continued to make fresh payments to the US for new weaponry. Whether it was a case of ill-management, lack of attention or sheer incompetence,

 it could have happened only in ‘Mera Bharat Mahan’.

                    ‘Mera Bharat Mahan’.

 
Finally
 
As can be seen, MoD is responsible for all facets of national defence. Unfortunately, it suffers from major fundamental flaws in its organisation and functioning. It is entirely manned by bureaucrats and officials who are clueless about defence matters. The service headquarters are mere attached offices. They do not form part of the decision making apparatus.

 
MoD is a citadel of bureaucracy and is totally devoid of professionalism.

The world abhors dealing with it.

 Since 2014, a measly sum of USD 1.12 million has come in as FDI despite the government raising the cap to 100 percent. Incompetence results in vacillation and lack of decision making; and that dissuades all prospective investors.  

 
Most disappointingly, the political leadership remains a powerless spectator. Howsoever broad Modi’s 56 INCHES chest may be and howsoever well-meaning Parrikar may be; bureaucracy continues to call the shots and not a single (yes, not a single) reform has been implemented during the last two years. All those pre-election boasts have proved to be mere baloney. MoD carries on functioning in its lethargic and inept manner. Hopefully, our chants of  

               ‘Mera Bharat Mahan’.

 will continue to deter potential enemies of India.*****