Showing posts with label MOD - DEFENCE MINISTER. Show all posts
Showing posts with label MOD - DEFENCE MINISTER. Show all posts

Friday, March 17, 2017

Why PM needs a Parrikar 2.0 as Raksha Mantri

SOURCE:
https://www.defencenews.org/2017/03/pm-needs-parrikar-2-0-raksha-mantri.html



Why PM needs a Parrikar 2.0 as Raksha Mantri


In 28 months, Manohar Parrikar as defense minister developed easy relationships with the top brass of the three Services as was rarely ever witnessed before. He threw caution to the winds and managed to pull the forces out of a downward spiral in operational capabilities.

Now that Manohar Parrikar’s return to Goa is done and dusted, the immediate priority for Prime Minister Narendra Modi will be to find an equally hard working, transparent and approachable Raksha Mantri for India.
Though Arun Jaitley, the perennial ‘go-to’ man, has been given additional charge of the defense ministry, surely he cannot be expected to handle two large and critical ministries simultaneously.

However, whosoever is the new occupant in South Block in the coming months will find it a hard act to follow since Parrikar, in his 28-month stint, had brought in a new sense of vigor and purpose in the largely moribund MoD.

Before Parrikar took over as defense minister, he had been variously described to me as a reluctant politician, an even more reluctant minister at the Center and an outsider in the power corridors of Delhi.

To my mind, after getting acquainted with him over the past two-and-a-half years, Parrikar can be best described as a simple man who is not a simpleton; a man of frugal habits who shunned all visible trappings of power and was quick to understand complex issues.

Parrikar Will Be missed at Defense Ministry

Those attributes not only allowed him to grasp the intricacies and complexities of the important ministry, but also enabled him to put his own stamp on the day-to-day functioning of the MoD.

There have been slip-ups and some embarrassments too because well-entrenched vested interests tried to undermine his authority.
I remember meeting him for the first time in February 2015 (before that, I had only heard of Parrikar as an unusual politician).

One of the questions he had was: “What, in your view, is the biggest challenge here?”

At first, because of unfamiliarity with him, I had thought of playing safe and gave a standard reply that, “It is a large, sensitive and important ministry and therefore not easy to understand quickly.”

But his easy manner encouraged me to be bolder and remark: “Your greatest challenge will be the status quo mindset that pervades through the civil and military bureaucracy. Everyone will tell you that such and such thing cannot be done because there has been no precedent to it. If you can overcome that trend, maybe you would have made a big start.”
I cannot judge if Parrikar took that input (not advice) seriously, but whoever I came across since then — whether in the Services or in the defense industry — swore by Parrikar’s efforts to re-engerise the MoD and bring in more accountability.

This in itself is a big change because at the best of times, the MoD is a lumbering giant, slow to stir and act.

It is not only entrusted with the defense of the country but is also the administrative ministry for India’s nearly 15 lakh military personnel (Army, Navy, Air Force and Coast Guard).

It also has one of the largest budgets in the government. For 2017-18, for instance, it has been allocated Rs 359,854 crore ($53.5 billion).

Critics have quibbled over the comparatively low increase in the defense budget this year. But that is the least of the challenges.

Instead, reducing timelines for acquisitions, better and optimum utilization of available resources, bringing in more accountability and transparency in the MoD’s functioning and making sure most critical voids in India’s defense preparedness are made up in quick time, have been the focus areas in South Block.

But above all, the MoD under Parrikar saw to it that the prime minister’s Make in India initiative gets the necessary impetus in defense production.

Promulgation of Defense of Procurement Policy-2016 was the first step towards making fundamental changes in the way weapons platforms are acquired in India.

The Buy IDDM (Indigenously Designed, Developed and Manufactured) category, introduced in DPP-2016, now gets the topmost priority among six categories that constitute the new DPP, which is the guiding document for all defense purchases in India.

Make Indian, Buy Indian: Defense Minister’s Mantra
In effect, this means all those Indian companies who have the capability of designing and developing their products indigenously will from now on get the first preference in most purchases that the three armed forces undertake.
Under the new category for IDDM equipment, it will be mandatory for 40 per cent of the content to be sourced locally.
The new DPP has many fresh ideas designed to accelerate defense acquisitions while encouraging indigenous companies under the flagship program of Make in India.
For instance, in order to cut down delays, the DPP henceforth mandates that all Acceptances of Necessity of a particular platform will be valid only for only six months as against the 12 months deadline that it currently provides.
Moreover, no AON will be notified until it is accompanied by a finalized RFP (Request for Proposal or detailed tender). In essence, this eliminates one intermediate stage since notifying an RFP after an AON used to be inordinately delayed.
Prioritization of Projects Was The First Step
Defense acquisitions are expensive and since very little was purchased in the past five years, the backlog just added to the problem.
A review of proposed projects made over the previous five years found that the bureaucracy in the ministry — both civil and military — was sitting on some 400-odd big and small projects that were critical to the three armed forces. A thorough review revealed that nearly one-third of the 400-odd projects were now irrelevant. So they were discarded.
About 50 projects were accelerated since they were of critical importance.
Next, important schemes across the three services that needed immediate funding and implementation were identified.
The figures speak for themselves: The MoD cleared a total of 124 new contracts worth Rs 209,751 crores since the Modi government came to power.
These include artillery guns, attack and medium lift helicopters for the Army (Chinook and Apache helicopters from the US); frigates and mine counter-measure vessels for the Navy and Akash missiles for the Air Force.
Post-September 2016, when India conducted ‘surgical strikes’ against Pakistan, it seemed for a while that Pakistan may mobilize for a larger conflict,
India’s Cabinet Committee on Security authorized the three forces to make fast track acquisitions worth nearly Rs 20,000 crores making it one of the most productive years for the MoD.
This had to be done on priority because the previous government had neglected even the basic requirements.
The previous Comptroller and Auditor General report tabled in Parliament made for grim reading.
‘Stocking of ammunition even at “minimum acceptable risk level” was not ensured, as availability of ammunition as on March 2013 was below this level in respect of 125 out of a total of 170 types of ammunition.’
Also, in 50 per cent of the total types of ammunition, the holding was ‘critical’ — insufficient for even 10 days of fighting, the report added.
This has now been corrected by making sure that ammunition for 10 days of intense fighting is always in stock.
Once that objective is achieved, the ministry will look at further replenishing the stocks.
The delegated financial powers for the vice-chiefs of the three Services and army commanders have been enhanced to allow speedier purchases.
This is a big change in the notoriously slow and opaque functioning that has historically besieged the MoD.
In another major decision, the government opened up the defence sector for FDI, allowing 49 percent FDI through the automatic route and up to 100 percent FDI on a case to case basis.
Also, the restrictions on what was ‘state-of-the-art technology’ has been reduced to ‘modern technology’. This would increase the number of defence companies investing in India.
Procurement and modernization of three services apart, the biggest decision by the Modi government was to grant the One Rank One pension — a 40-year-old demand of the veterans.
Although there have been some voices of disgruntlement on the issue, the fact is, this government showed the necessary political will and resolve to give due dignity to military veterans.
Significantly, the MoD has now allowed authorized, registered agents to represent companies and eliminate delays or cancellation of contracts because of anonymous complaints. Anonymous letters are now a no-go.
The ministry wants to use the power to ban a firm only in the rarest case. The previous government had indiscriminately blacklisted over a dozen firms, severely restricting the options of the forces to source equipment.
Despite Parrikar’s efficiency and good intentions, a toxic legacy left behind by a decade and more of lethargy and timidity under A K Antony will take sustained efforts by Parrikar’s successor to ensure that the MoD effectively discharges its duties towards securing the nation.
Half-done initiatives like choosing the strategic partners for making defense platforms in India, reforming higher defence management (appointing a CDS — even if 4-star), creating joint commands for space, cyber and special operations will have to be followed upon by Parrikar’s successor.
It is for Prime Minister Modi to choose the right man — or woman — to do that, and do it fast.

Wednesday, March 15, 2017

PARIKKAR DEFENCE MATRIC FAIL HO GYA, GRADED TO THIRD CLASS WITH GRACE MARKS

SOURCE:
http://www.tribuneindia.com/news/comment/parrikar-only-added-to-list-of-status-quoists/377081.html




PARIKKAR DEFENCE  MATRIC  FAIL HO GYA, GRADED TO THIRD CLASS                  WITH GRACE MARKS





 Mar 15, 2017,

              Parrikar only added 

                                   to 

                 list of status-quoists


         Lt Gen Vijay Oberoi (retd)

At the behest of bureaucracy, Parrikar started interfering in the internal affairs of the armed forces, instead of leaving them to the chiefs. It was also during his helmsman-ship that the defence budget touched a nadir, at less than 1.6% of the GDP.




Speculation about the change of the current Defence Minister had been going on even before the recently held elections in many states were announced. With the Goa Governor inviting Manohar Parrikar to form the government, it is no longer speculation.

Parrikar remained Defence Minister for less than two and a half years, which, of course, is just a statistic. More important is how his tenure has been as the political head of the Indian military.Before one carries out an analysis, it may be pertinent to have a look at the task a Minister of Defence is required to perform and how his predecessors have fared.

Since Independence, the country has had a total of 25 defence ministers, of which six were also prime ministers. Like other ministers, there is no fixed tenure for the defence minister, who is appointed or removed by the prime minster. The minister is often assisted by a minister of state for defence and, less commonly, the lower-ranked deputy minister of defence. The first defence minister of independent India was Baldev Singh, who was appointed even in the Interim Government, from September 2, 1946, and then continued after Independence till 1952.

If one were to make a broad statement, it appears to a military person like me that the Indian armed forces have not been singularly lucky in having wise, efficient and professionally knowledgeable defence ministers most of the time. This is despite the fact that the minister has an extremely important role to play in the council of ministers. The reason is that a Defence Minister is a member of the powerful Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) — the earlier avatar was the Cabinet Committee on Political Affairs — and which is the highest policy making body in the country on all aspects of national security.


If one were to ask the officials of the Ministry of Defence (MoD) the same question, they will either refuse to commit themselves or express happiness at each one of them, because they continued to rule the roost irrespective of who defence minister was! That, in brief and without any further explanation, is the difference between the outlooks of military and civil officials.

Returning to who has been the most effective defence minister, I will with out any hesitation take the name of Arun Singh, without any  hesitation was only a minister of state as Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi had kept the portfolio of defence with himself.
The reason was that he appreciated the nuances of security issues; was aware of the requirements of the military and what made it tick; and did not pander to the foibles and intrigues of the generalist bureaucracy.

‘Kicking upstairs’ is a well-known phrase; I wonder if there an expression such as ‘kicking downstairs’! Be that as it may, there is also no clarity relating to the inter se importance between a Cabinet minister at the Centre and a chief minister of a state.

 Even in the past, there have been cases of movements to and from the Centre to the states, and vice versa. Sharad Pawar was appointed Defence Minister on June 26, 1991, but in March 1993 he was moved to Maharashtra as chief minister.

When Parrikar took over as defence minister from Arun Jaitley on November 9, 2014, there was a sense of relief as well as optimism. Jaitley, then wearing two hats, had his eyes only on the North Block. The country in general and the military in particular could not understand why these two important ministries had been placed under one incumbent, especially one who had been rejected by the people in the elections and had come by the Rajya Sabha route.

The military welcomed Parrikar for being more professional and technically sound than a politician. They reposed their faith in him and expected that he would ensure a better deal for them; would assist them in regaining their pride and élan that had been severely eroded over the past two decades; and were looking forward to moves towards modernisation that had virtually stopped. However, they were disappointed to see that his party colleagues saw him as a provincial politician and he was unable to change the dispensation or the system.

Parrikar’s tenure as defence minister had its ups and downs; perhaps more of the latter as far as the military is concernedAt the behest of the bureaucracy,he started interfering in the internal affairs of the armed forces, instead of leaving them to the chiefs of the Services, which is rightly their domain. He made somewhat of a mess of the long-pending and highly emotive issue of granting OROP as it was meant to be, because of succumbing to the balderdash of inadequacy of funds — the excuse given by the Finance Ministry as well as bureaucrats of the MoD. 

In the bargain, he not only alienated the armed forces but also affected the morale of the forces. 
Ultimately, while the military continued to struggle to get their dues in financial terms, the bureaucrats, police and other civil administrative services walked away smugly with all kinds of enhancements, perks and the like. Even the so-called NFU is being denied, despite a judicial ruling on the issue!

Besides financial matters, it was during the helmsman-ship of Parrikar that the plummeting of the defence budget reached a nadir, with less than 1.6 per cent of the GDP being allotted in this year’s budget. That brings down the military to the same level as it existed in 1962, the outcome of which is well-known to the nation. Even in percentage terms, the year-on-year growth of 5.6 per cent is ridiculously low. In the previous year too, it was equally bad. Other parameters on which the defence budget could be assessed are also dismal, e.g., it is only 12.77 per cent of the Central government expenditure (CGE). The Army, Navy and Air Force have received only 60, 67 and 54 per cent, respectively, of the funds they had sought for modernisation. In addition, out of the total outlay of Rs 2.74 lakh crore, only Rs 86,488 crore has been earmarked for modernisation. What makes it worse is that the bulk of this capital outlay will be used to pay “committed liabilities” of earlier arms contracts, instead of new projects.


When a Defence Minister joins the committee culture of the bureaucracy, as Parrikar has done, with recommendations of the committees either pending or extended or lying in cupboards without any action, then all is obviously at a standstill on the security of the nation.



Perhaps the worst action that Parrikar took was joining his party colleagues in grossly taking credit for the professionally competent actions of the army in its much publicised surgical strike and virtually politicising the Indian military, which takes pride in its apolitical ethos.

Parrikar is a well-meaning, intelligent and highly educated person, but he was perhaps too much of a gentleman to squarely face his well-entrenched colleagues in the party and the government. This resulted in his doing very little to assist the armed forces in many aspects, some of which have been highlighted above.

—The writer is a former vice chief of army staff.

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

PS"
[http://www.tribuneindia.com/news/editorials/defence-minister-leaves/377059.html ]
Opinion » Editorials

 Mar 15, 2017. 



Defence Minister leaves


A job not even half done

In Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s ordered way of doing things, Manohar Parrikar was ordained to accomplish several radical makeovers in the Defence Ministry. Plucked from the obscurity of the politically lightweight state of Goa, the IIT graduate was brought to Delhi to wipe off the sloth and sleaze that had supposedly accumulated in the Defence Ministry during AK Antony’s stewardship. There was the question of uplifting the soldier’s morale that had been dented because of the UPA Government’s pusillanimity; speeding up purchases held up because of Antony's indecisiveness; rearranging the higher defence management; and of course ensuring that all major weapon systems are manufactured in India. It seemed that all Parrikar had to do was to come up with approach papers and in Modi’s linear world of instant solutions, implementation could start straight away.

Now that Parrikar has returned to the more familiar world of Goa, were his two years in the Defence Ministry well spent? Parrikar did accomplish the larger political purpose of equating the armed forces with the BJP’s concept of nationalism. So the Army’s surgical strike was tom-tommed all over the country, especially in poll-bound Uttar Pradesh, as the ruling party’s Brahmastra to violence emanating from unresolved political questions. Any grievance against public policy was shouted down by comparing the soldier’s perseverance and sense of loyalty against all odds with the citizen’s inability to take an inconvenience in his stride.


But in his Ministry, Parrikar will earn a C grade with the remarks, “showed sincerity but needed to apply himself to the job.” Indeed murmurs from the Defence Ministry all through his tenure were about Parrikar readily forsaking the perseverance required for the job for the joys of settling petty political squabbles in Goa.
 Was it any wonder that all through his tenure, the Ministry fell short in purchasing equipment? The suicide rate is again in the worrying range and a radical rearranging of defence management awaits another minister. Modi might have won a resounding victory in UP, but a mid-term evaluation of the Defence Ministry would indicate it has been all sound and very little actual work.