Tuesday, January 12, 2016

ON PERPETUATED POLTICIAN'S & REPORTER'S MILTARY COUP





 ON PERPETUATED  POLTICIAN'S 
                                    & 
REPORTER'S MILTARY COUP   



                         Please find below Gen VK Singh's

 statement, addressed to Mr.Snehesh of 

PTI, in response to the irresponsible and 

absurd statements by Mr Manish Tiwari 

and Shekhar Gupta:


             To Whom It May Concern


A certain right honourable out-of-work former MP a couple of days ago decided to make a straight-faced ‘admission’ to the People of India that the insinuated Coup story carried by a national newspaper in 2012 ‘was unfortunately true’.


In my autobiography, Courage & Conviction, I had devoted two paragraphs to this ludicrous story, which had been written out of pique or on instructions of his mentor in the then PMO, by the editor of the newspaper (I believe he had felt insulted that there was another media person – who he considered inferior to him – present when he came to me to seek clarification about such rumours or the pique was because I had refused to do the Walk the Talk programme of his). The ‘story’ that was subsequently picked up by the entire national media was nothing but pure bunkum and everyone in the chain of command knew it and said so. Mr Coupta, the editor, in question, had egg all over his face and even rookie journalists across the country were laughing at him.


Mr Coupta, of course, having done the damage, has now spent the last few years trying to get away from the lingering smell of his own creation, which will probably haunt him for the rest of his life. Perhaps when his hour or reckoning comes, in his conscience the Coup story will have competition from the sensationalized article that he wrote about the Golden Temple attack in 1984. Anyone interested in seeing what he had to say then can easily get the story from the archives. He even had artillery firing from Jallianwala Bagh! ‘National Interest’ indeed!!


Then along comes Mr T, until yesterday the brash face of the party in power, who despite knowing the facts of the case fully well, decides to brazenly tell a lie. He is much too intelligent a person not to know what he was doing or saying and he is a lawyer too. Let me also emphasize that by trying to get at me he has once again caused collateral damage to the 13 lac strong patriotic force that protects the country and so that he and Mr Coupta can sleep peacefully. In one stroke he has cast doubts not only on the integrity of this force but also of the government he was a part of and the then RM and PM – both men who are held in high esteem by his own Party.


As has been the case in the past, there are plenty of Mr Coupta’s colleagues out there who immediately focused on Mr T’s remark and made shrill pronouncements on TV. Before I knew it, I had mikes being thrust at me from all quarters asking for a ‘byte’.



Despite being sick and tired of constantly defending myself from fabricated stories, I once again repeated that the story was pure rubbish and suggested to Mr T and his followers to read my book.


Mr T promptly retorted that he will certainly do so if I promise to read his book, which is in the offing, whatever that means! Normally, out of politeness and as a courtesy to a fellow human being, I would agree. But in Mr T’s case, I see no reason why I should, since he has already established, in the one stroke of opportunistic sensationalism, that he has absolutely no regard for the truth.


Since we are talking of military literature, may I suggest that Mr T reads General S. P. P. Thorat’s From Reveille to Retreat (republished version is in the offing), Brigadier John Dalvi's Himalayan Blunder and the more recent book by Shiv Kunal Verma 1962: The War That Wasn’t. If he is honest with himself and can rise above being a blind camp follower, he will see what the cynical politics of his forefathers did to this country half a century ago.


Using the bogey of a military coup and then by politicizing one of the finest armies in the world, his party presided over an absolute disaster and it was men from my own battalion, 2 Rajput, who paid the price with hundreds of other soldiers. We lost 282 men in one hour while the remainder were wounded and were made POWs. There were just a dozen or so survivors – that is why I’m getting ‘antsy’. My sworn oath to protect this country means one has to not just look beyond the borders but also tackle the likes Mr T and Mr C.


It’s a vicious circle – Mr T gives Mr Coupta a certificate on the bidding of some vested party; Mr Coupta goes on TV to give Mr T a slap on the back for being a politician who has the guts to back him up and hey presto, the world is a happy place as Mr T and Mr C are both back in the headlines. Apart from the venerable old Mr Mani Shankar Aiyar, the wise one who asked Pakistan to help him in bringing down the elected Prime Minister of this country, I really cannot hear anyone even from Mr T’s party applauding.


As for the media, especially a particularly shrill channel that seems to have a single point agenda where the anchor suffers from a regular period of outrage everyday at 9 p.m., my simple advice is please grow up. This was a laughable story in 2012, it is a laughable story today. May I remind you that in the words of Rudyard Kipling, the unforgiving minute is sixty seconds worth of distance run… so please stop wasting the time of this country. There are too many pressing problems that need attention. Leave some of us alone to do our job.

Thank You,

Gen VK Singh


















OROP KRANTI : ओआरओपी पर जारी है गतिरोध, नही थमा प्रदर्शन का सिलसिला

SOURCE ::https://tnapost.com/nation/orop-an-excursive-interview-with-retired-group-captain-vk-gandhi10012016/





OROP KRANTI :: MAG GEN SATBIR SINGH - Letter to Members of Parliament regarding





Satbir satbirsm@gmail.com via googlegroups.com 

AttachmentsJan 11 (1 day ago)


to iesm_group

                                                                     Dated: 11 Jan 2016

UNITED FRONT OF EX –SERVICEMEN (UFESM)
ONE RANK ONE PENSION (OROP)
Dear Veterans,
Letter to Members of Parliament regarding One Rank One Pension (OROP) dated 11 Jan 2016 is enclosed herewith for your information and widest circulation please.

With Regards
Maj Gen Satbir Singh, SM (Retd)                                                                    
Advisor United Front of ESM & Chairman IESM                                                     
Tele No : 0124-4110579,09312404269                                                            



                                                                                                                                                     Dated: 11 Jan 2016



UNITED FRONT OF EX –SERVICEMEN (UFESM)
ONE RANK ONE PENSION (OROP)
Dear Members of Parliament,

You are all aware of the issue of One Rank One Pension of Armed Forces. This issue is being debated since 1984 and finally OROP was strongly recommended by Koshiari Committee in 2011
As per Koshyari Committee Report, and the deposition by Secretary (ESW), Ministry of Defence, before the Committee One Rank One Pension is defined as.

Definition
 "One Rank One Pension implies that uniform pension be paid to the Armed Forces Personnel retiring in the same rank with the same length of service irrespective of their date of retirement and any future enhancement in the rates of pension to be automatically passed on to the past pensioners”.

The above definition of OROP has been accepted by both houses of the Parliament. Honorable Supreme Court has also ruled in favor of OROP in  many judgments. The same definition was included in the Executive Order of the Govt of India for the Implementation of OROP vide its letter No- 12(01)/2014-D (Pen/Pol) dated 26 Feb 2014 (Copy enclosed).

The One Rank One Pension which has been announced on Sep 5, 2015 and notified on Nov 7, 2015 is not the real OROP. It has many anomalies  illustrated below which if not corrected will completely destroy the definition of OROP approved by the Parliament.

1.    Revision every 5 years instead of every year: This defeats the very concept and definition of OROP.
Illustration: 20 YEARS OF SERVICE FOR THE FOLLOWING 2 SEPOYS:

Sepoy A and Sepoy B join army on 1 July 1991
Sepoy A- retires in Nov 2011- Rs.4000/- as basic wage. Pension = Rs.2000/-.
Sepoy B - retires in March 2012- Rs 4500/- as basic wage (Increment as per Jan 1st). Pension = Rs. 2250/-
A is getting Rs 250+ DA = Rs. 600/- less than B and having served for the same length of service of 20 yrs.
Loss incurred - Rs.7200/- per year or Rs 36,000/- in 5 years.

2.   Govt has announced that Benefit of OROP will be effective with effect from 1.7.2014: Instead of 01 Apr 2014, thereby causing a loss to the ESM of 2100 Crores that is presuming annual expenditure of Rs 8400/ crore on OROP . 
Illustration: All articles approved in any budget are applicable from 1st April each year. Hence OROP should also be effective from 1st April 2014.

By making it effective from 1st July 2014 government is putting ESM at a loss of Rs.2100/-Crores for three months

3.  Govt has announced that Base year for award of OROP to be the calendar year of 2013 instead of Financial Year of 31 March 2014. This defeats the definition of OROP and puts the old pensioners at loss as compared to the present pensioners. This will also mean that a pensioner holding senior rank will get pension less than his junior rank.
Illustration: if Base year for pension is likely to be 2013 as against 31 Mar 2014 when OROP is applicable from 1st April 2014. This put a soldier behind by one year / annual increment which is Rs. 500/-. However if the effective date for implementation is planned to be 1 July 2014 then the pension should be based on 30 June 2014.

4.    Fixation of pension as the mean average of the pay band instead of the top level: This adds insult to injury and defeats the definition of OROP. Puts the old pensioners at loss as compared to the present pensioners.

Illustration: By making it the mean of the year 2013 the defence personnel retiring with pension above the mean will be at disadvantage.  This would require application of protection clause for a large number of retirees.
Supposing A soldier retires in 1980 on completion of 20 years of service.

OROP means his pension should be brought at par with the pension of the soldier retiring on 31st March 2014 with 20 years of service. By taking mean of min and max pension of 2013, the soldier will be put to financial loss. This loss can only be calculated once pension tables are declared by CGDA.

5. One person judicial committee instead of a five person committee: This commission will not have representative from ESM but will have a member from IAS as secretary. Hence, it is expected that the recommendations of the committee will be influenced by IAS lobby (based on inputs from the IAS lobby). Recommendations of 7 CPC are indications wherein Armed Forces have not been given due justice. However announcement of judicial committee by GOI alongwith the notification is a clear indication that GOI is sure that this notification is faulty and will not be accepted by the Defence Fraternity.  

In the age of smartphones and Social Media, no person is left unaware of the happenings in any part of the country. The serving members of the Armed forces are well aware of the acts of the government and the Protest Movement by the Ex-Servicemen at Jantar Mantar and across the country. The present Prime Minister made a promise to the Armed Forces at Rewari before the General Elections in 2014 that his Government will deliver OROP on taking oath of office if elected to form Govt.  Implementation of OROP was also included in the President address to both houses of Parliament when the NDA Govt took over. That promise has not been fulfilled by this Government even after one and half year. 

It is a common knowledge that more than 70% of  serving soldiers are relatives of the Ex-servicemen. Ill treatments of veterans will have direct demotivating effect on the serving soldiers.
It is also noteworthy that there is shortage of 30% in the Armed Forces. Policies adopted by the government have led to a situation where the youth of today is demotivated to join the Armed Forces. Clearly, this shall lead to more reduced number than existing today. These deficiencies are serious nature and have direct bearing on National Security.

May we request you to ponder over the situation and think about the security of India in coming years. May we also request you to ask for serious discussion in Parliament on National Security and nail the Government so that every Indian is educated about the fraud being played on the nation by the GOI. May we also  ask you to raise questions in the  Parliament and ask the government to Implement One Rank One Pension (OROP) after removal of the seven shortcomings pointed out and issue fresh Notification exactly as per approved definition of OROP.

With Regards

Maj Gen Satbir Singh, SM (Retd)                                                                    
Advisor United Front of ESM & Chairman IESM                                                     
Tele No : 0124-4110579,09312404269                                                            


PAK TERRORISM - PATHANKOT :Pathankot Attack And Talks With Pakistan














      Debate: Pathankot Attack And Talks                         With Pakistan

Published on Jan 4, 2016

Today bodies of two terrorists have been found after detonating the canteen. Know who should be held responsible for the Pathankot terror attack.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qnnu8AC8x0s






Published on Jan 4, 2016

Videos on the go! Watch News World India LIVE TV and stay updated anytime, anywhere with News World India's App. Click To Download 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qnnu8AC8x0s




     





  Attack | Did Punjab Police Fail To Counter A Strike?                               The Newshour Debate
                                  (4th Jan 2016)





Published on Jan 4, 2016

On The Newshour Debate, TIMES NOW Editor-in-Chief Arnab Goswami, with panellists- Dr Sudhanshu Trivedi, National Spokesperson, BJP & Political Advisor to Rajnath Singh; Harcharan Bains, Advisor on National Affairs to CM Punjab & General Secy, SAD; RSN Singh, Former RAW Officer; Lt General (Retd) Ata Hasnain, Defence Analyst; Maroof Raza, Consulting Editor, Strategic Affairs and Vikram Singh, Former DGP, Uttar Pradesh, discussed if the cops failed to thwart a strike.



          Pathankot Attack : The Newshour Debate
                                    (6th Jan 2016)






https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1b3C2L-Lzqk







Published on Jan 6, 2016

TIMES NOW's Editor-in-Chief Arnab Goswami, and panelists -- Dr Sambit Patra, National Spokesperson, BJP; Manjit Singh GK, President, Delhi Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee; Lt General (Retd) Vinod Bhatia, Fmr DGMO & Defence Analyst; C Pal Singh, Fmr IG Punjab Police; Maroof Raza, Consulting Editor, Strategic Affairs; and T R Kakkar, Former Police Commissioner, Delhi -- discuss the glaring contradictions getting exposed over Pathankot terror attack, NIA questioning Gurdaspur SP Salwinder's Singh's abduction theory, blatant discrepancies presented in different versions, and whether SP version would hold up, and whether he could be believed.