ON THIS DAY FORTY TWO YEARS AGO -ON 15 DEC 1971

       ON THIS DAY FORTY TWO YEARS AGO

                            ON 15 DEC 1971



   ( Remembrances   of a VETERAN received just a few minutes back)







..................December 15 we fought the toughest battle in six tree area. I was at Parbat Ali after providing firm base for the capture of Parbat Ali, I got a desperate call from Maj Alhuwalia to report back to the battalion. We ran across few sand  dunes and reached the battalion. Alhuwalia showed me a clump of trees at a distance of approximately two kilometers from the bn headquarters and directed me to report to Lt Col Basanth singh at that location. When I reached that location, there were many causalities lying near a small village huts waiting to be evacuated, few were dead, others were bleeding to death, Maj Arora was shot, Capt Bedi was blown over a mine field, Capt Bahadur was killed and lying in a mine field, Captain Sen Gupta, the Arty op was badly injured and his TA was killed, Capt Shahi  was badly injured,A company O group was shattered in arty fire, Pakistani air OP was flying over us and started registering our location and the enemy arty fire intensity increased with great accuracy. Col Basant Singh appeared cool and in soft voice he told me that he is stalling the attack and directed me to hold on to the objective at any cost, he placed B company and shattered A coy under my command till he arranged  company commander for B coy, he ordered Maj Virk to take over B company with immediate effect, unfortunately it did not materialize till next day, there was some personality clash between Maj Alhuwalia and Virk. Soon the arty fire metamorphosed in to waves of barrage, Chandra it was really frightening at the initial stage, but the desert sand absorbed the arty fire gradually we regained confidence, we held on to six tree area while neighbouring battalion ,as enjoying  Pakistani fire power demonstration on us, the fire power demonstration continued till late in the evening, we suffered few causalities and we soon got them evacuated them under the cover of darkness, by 16 Dec  there were rumors about end of war. After the war six tree area became a tourist spot for VIPs. We had to make expensive snacks for the VIPs and we enjoyed snacks and cool drinks when they left the location, during their visit they advised us how to fight the battle and modern tactics etc etc. Bastards every one can advise & make grandeur plans with two eggs omelette in the stomach  Tough age is catching up the memory of 71 war is vivid in my mind. I rang up most of our war veterans including Col Basant Singh. The sad aspect is that ALL OF US who are alive today are a forgotten entity even  the Battalion is also oblivion  of our existence yet they celebrate the Battle Honour Day on this very day every year.....................


















 

MACHINATIONS OF A MACHIAVELLIAN

             



                  PART ONE of THREE PARTS


  MACHINATIONS OF A MACHIAVELLIAN


                                        CHAPTER -1

                    THE GENERAL OF THE GENERALS

                                MACHIAVELLIAN

                                     " SHEKAR GUPTA "




Source:

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/national-interest-disarming-kashmir/1204466/3

      National Interest: Disarming Kashmir

Shekhar Gupta :

 

 

 

 Sat Dec 07 2013, 01:52 hrs

Use Modi's call for debate on Art 370 for a bold rethink —


               begin with role of the army.

















 First, a disclosure. Narendra Modi's call for a fresh debate on Article 370 is not the provocation for this week's 'National Interest', though it could very well have been so.

My inspiration, on the other hand, was more personal. At breakfast in a hotel coffee shop in Mumbai last week, a guest walked up. After saying nice things to me about our paper, he said he had only one complaint: that we had paid no attention to the plight of Kashmiri Pandits, while we go on and on about the Gujarat riots of 2002. I argued it wasn't a zero-sum game and both were terrible contemporary tragedies, and that it wasn't fair to say that the media had underplayed one while exaggerating the other.



   But an argumentative Indian doesn't give in so easily, particularly one who is a regular Indian Express reader. So he asked me how exercised anybody had been about the "half a million Pandits exiled" from Kashmir and "2,000 killed in cold blood", while "a thousand Muslims killed in Gujarat" was such a big story. He said he wasn't a Kashmiri Pandit either. He had merely married one.



   Now, there is nothing more painful, even infuriating, than the idea that the lives and safety of one set of your countrymen be valued differently from another's, just because they happen to be from different faiths or regions. So I said, at the risk of over-simplification and with some convenient rounding off of numbers, that if you think a half million Pandits were exiled, a half million Indian soldiers armed with the most illiberal of laws have been fighting to "rectify" things in the state. And if you say that 2,000 Pandits have been killed, something like a hundred thousand Kashmiri Muslims have been killed (though not all necessarily by our soldiers) in Kashmir's 24-year maelstrom (remember, the attacks on Pandits started in 1989). So what are you complaining about? But if you think that was crude on my part (which it was), listen to his response: "Oh, really, that many Kashmiri Muslims have been killed! Then it's ok. But why isn't the media telling the world that?" I realised that this argument was going someplace I did not particularly want to go. Definitely not when a very busy day was just beginning.







   It was the very same afternoon that Modi made his statement on Article 370, and it was interesting coming from somebody ranking at the very top of secular demonology. It is early days, but I'll stick my neck out and say it is the first time you have heard a new idea on India's most significant internal and external security challenge from a BJP leader since Atal Bihari Vajpayee's brilliant and statesmanly offer to talk to Kashmiris within the framework of "insaniyat" (humanity) and not limit himself to that cliched parameter, India's Constitution. Vajpayee knew better than most that the deepest, most painful scars are emotional. The healing touch for them has to be emotional too. It can't be a few more leaves out of your chequebook, nor any further tightening of the spiral of curfews and executions. 




  If you were a strategic affairs analyst, one of your biggest frustrations with the UPA would be that it has wasted 10 years of peace, so rare in India's history. In these 10 years, India could have embarked on an irreversible and visionary modernisation, re-equipping and re-orienting its armed forces. But given the Bapu Nadkarni-style leadership of our defence establishment, we have avoided any change or risk-taking altogether (Nadkarni rarely let anybody score or got him out, he also tried not to get out by not scoring. He holds the one Test cricket world record that will forever remain Indian: 21 consecutive maiden overs, against the usual suspect of the Sixties, England. And had figures of 32 overs, 27 maidens, 5 runs, and most importantly, no wickets). All three wings of our armed forces are doctrinally where they were in 2004 and have the same weaponry, too. But more importantly, this Nadkarni mindset has infiltrated strategic policymaking as well. A government that made such a revolutionary strategic shift by signing the nuclear deal with the US and was rewarded for it by voters in 2009 has not come up with one new idea or initiative on Kashmir. The one political initiative it took, the appointment of a team of interlocutors, was dumped and their report put in cold storage.







  Because its politics is frozen, it has introduced an unprecedented new factor in Indian policymaking: a veto for the army. So the government, the prime minister, would want to settle Siachen and even think it is low-hanging fruit. But what to do, the army doesn't agree. Of course, with such relative peace and normalcy on the ground, there is scope for a partial thinning of army presence and at least some symbolic dilution of the Armed Forces Special Powers Act. But no, the army vetoes it, and does so in public. So which country are we living in?





  Nobody wishes to be confused with facts these days, so why blame my outraged new friend at breakfast. Yet, we must state them. At the peak of the Kashmir insurgency, we would lose up to 500 soldiers a year. The graph has declined so dramatically and progressively since 2003 that in all of 2012, only 17 of our uniformed men lost their lives in and around the Kashmir Valley. Civilian casualties have declined accordingly. An armed skirmish now takes place once in a few months. I am conscious of the protests this will bring. As also of the dangers of over-simplification. But I cannot help underlining what one of India's most respected former (and soldierly) generals, with five tenures in Kashmir, tells me. That in the past five years, the army has built more new golf courses and guest houses in Kashmir than the number of encounters it's had to fight.







    If you are a student of modern military history, you can see how difficult armies find it to return home in victory. A retreat in defeat leaves you no choice. But a retreat in victory, get your head examined. But leaders, political and military, who are more far-sighted and large-hearted than this turn the course of history. As Indira Gandhi and Sam Manekshaw did after 1971. From the day of the Pakistani surrender, they embarked on a prompt and decisive withdrawal plan. On the other hand, Vajpayee, Brajesh Mishra and L.K. Advani lost their "victory" moment during Operation Parakram. On January 12, 2002, within the first month of the Parliament attack and military build-up, Pervez Musharraf made his most grovelling speech ever, even talking of handing over the 20 on India's most wanted list if they are found in Pakistan, because "we have not given asylum to anyone". That is when the NDA should have declared victory in coercive diplomacy, and without having to fight a war they had never intended to. But they missed it and wasted almost two years searching for face-savers.





In the Valley today, if there was a military objective, it has been achieved. You can't be so stupid as to suggest we declare victory against our own people. But the fact is, the Lashkars have been roundly defeated in the Valley while they play havoc in Pakistan and savour a big forthcoming victory in Afghanistan. Such a significant change on the ground has to reflect in our policy on Kashmir, and towards Kashmiris. If the people of Kashmir have given us back peace and tranquility, they deserve a thank-you note. And because the army has delivered as much as any tough modern army could, it needs a respite too. So strengthen the LoC even more than before, but do de-escalate within the Valley. Let the people of Kashmir also start enjoying the fruits of peace in dignity. And if any Hizb or Lashkar thugs again surface some place, you can easily confront them with overwhelming force within minutes. This war was not against our own Kashmiris, Hindu or Muslim, nor between them. This was a proxy war launched from Pakistan and they have been defeated. Why then should Kashmir remain frozen now? Why should the Kashmiris be condemned to even less aspiration than their fellow Indians in Chhattisgarh?






  That is why the time to think creatively is now. Politics has to build on military success. Armies that stay on too long after fulfilling their immediate task tend to become lazy and complacent, even if not armies of occupation. Just to mention four recent examples: the 16 Cavalry HQ, raided by a Lashkar gang on September 26, had just one sentry at its entrance. The eight Assam Regiment soldiers killed in an ambush near Srinagar were returning from leave, in uniform, but were not carrying any arms. The five-man patrol annihilated on the night of August 5 in the Poonch sector, was probably caught napping, literally. And two soldiers of the 13 Raj Rif Regiment were earlier waylaid and killed in the Mendhar region in January. The lesson is, no army can stay fully at battle-stations even in times of peace. And no democracy can wait till its army can declare victory against its own people.







We have to learn from our own history of settling the Naga and Mizo insurgencies. You prove your military strength, but leave the final solution to open-minded negotiators and politicians.  Kashmir is at that inflection point now.  That is why Modi asking for a debate on Article 370, while his party has a six-decade-long holy commitment to abrogate it, is a welcome change. Kashmir is crying out for a new set of peacetime and political ideas. You cannot find a Kashmir settlement with Pakistan before embracing your own Kashmiris and restoring trust with them first.



sg@expressindia.com



















                     PART TWO OF THREE PARTS



                                            CHAPTER -  2




                                A FIGHTERS COMMENTS



Source:
http://www.indianexpress.com/news/-victory--in-the-valley/1206096/0

                      ‘Victory’ in the Valley

Wed Dec 11 2013, 12:54 hrs

 

 

 

Define what it means before you decide what the army should do.

 

 

For the first time in years, a newspaper's leadership has thrown up a serious strategic issue for debate. Kashmir is far too complex for inexperienced minds to fully comprehend and there are so many stakeholders it confounds even those who have a semblance of an idea. In a recent article in this paper ('Disarming Kashmir', IE, December 7, goo.gl/SWPD7G), Editor-in-Chief Shekhar Gupta talks about victory in the 24-year standoff and the necessity of an early withdrawal of the army from Kashmir's hinterland. We must first highlight what Gupta is seeking through this thought-provoking article. He says the army has become weary and therefore less professional, having lost soldiers in tactical operations this year. He wants the army to strengthen the LoC and de-escalate in the Valley, because Kashmiris, he says, must get a part of the "peace" dividend. He takes a dig, saying that some respected general with five tenures in the Valley had told him that, having defeated the Lashkar, the army has only been building golf courses and guest houses for the last five years. He adds that if any of these bad boys show their faces in Kashmir again, the army can come back to sort them out. He claims that the military objective in Kashmir (if any was spelt out) has been achieved and, that the UPA government has veritably introduced a new concept of governance — veto power (on strategic decisions) for the army. One of the most important points Gupta makes is, "you cannot find a Kashmir settlement with Pakistan before embracing your own Kashmiris and restoring trust with them first".

On the face of it, this article evokes negatives all the way but re-reads throw up issues which need serious pondering.

Unfortunately, not many are aware of the degree of intellectual analysis that the army itself has done of its role in Kashmir. It recently organised a full deliberation on the concept of victory at the Army War College, Mhow.

The first question is: have we ever enunciated an aim in Kashmir? In all these years, there never has been a clearly stated political aim given to the security forces. The informally stated military aim was stabilisation by controlling infiltration and eliminating terrorists. No one realises that in such situations, political and military aims cannot be separated. In 2011, we enunciated our own joint politico-military aim for our commanders — "integrate Jammu and Kashmir with mainstream India, politically, economically, socially and psychologically". We were clear that eliminating terrorists was the easiest part of this war, that eliminating "terrorism" was the real challenge. I wish Gupta had faulted the army for not demanding the articulation of a politico-military aim as fighting without an aim is actually unfair. The lack of such an aim results in exactly what Gupta has done — declaring victory prematurely. Victory has to be measured against an aim, or else all kinds of versions are thrown around. We also have to measure victory against a realistic assessment of the future. Afghanistan 2014 with all its imponderables looms before us; any idea of victorious peace and subsequent actions has to be connected to it. Incidentally, I am speaking of victory as not against the people of Kashmir but for them, and against the intent of Pakistan, the separatists and terror groups.

It is essential to explain a few things to those with limited military orientation. First, Kashmir is a case of rim-land insurgency. It is not the LoC alone that needs to be strong. In the event of conventional war with Pakistan, the hinterland of Kashmir is as important as the LoC. It is here that the strategic assets exist, along with strategic arteries, which can be choked in war. Remember, in each Indo-Pak war, Pakistan has depended on the Kashmiri people to rise against us. Second, the larger number of incidents, and the loss of brave soldiers, this year should make us re-evaluate the actual military situation in the Valley. Ironically, this is least important in assessing victory. In counter-insurgency/ counter-terrorism campaigns, the answer finally lies in what the people think. Third, in all these years, no serious attempt was made to project to the Kashmiri people how and why their future lay only with India. The only agency that did this was the army. No government agency has ever put together a psychological campaign to win the confidence of the people. The army did it because it is a part of its professional responsibility and all international military counter-insurgency experience talks of winning hearts and minds (WHAM). The "hearts doctrine" articulated by the army in 2011-12 was the first strategically oriented WHAM programme in Kashmir. Separatism and radicalism run hand in hand in the Valley and it will take years of committed campaigning before these are diluted — the on and off presence of terror groups doesn't help. Who has the capability to strategise, plan and stay committed to such a campaign but the army? To presume that the army has done its job and should hand over the responsibility to civilian agencies is absolutely correct, provided there are agencies who can take it forward to "peace". If there is none, why rue the army's insistence that its work must not be undone? Twenty-four years of institutional wisdom need not be sacrificed in the urgency for declaring a premature victory.

A few other observations by Gupta are designed to provoke non-intellectual minds, but they deserve a brief comment. The number of soldiers lost in negative incidents in a year is never reflective of the capability of an army fighting terrorism. Moreover, the deployment of the regular army in the hinterland is at its minimum today. The army's Rashtriya Rifles (RR) operates in the hinterland and its soldiers never get exhausted because it has a well-thought-out relief programme. Tactical minds within the RR also rue their presence among the populace, to neutralise just a handful of terrorists each year. This really is the problem — a misunderstanding that the RR's task is to kill terrorists alone, and not recognising that the task of a counter-insurgency force is to cement the separatist population with the mainstream. There is something else that our countrymen need to know about the RR: the highly professional and experienced military force is our add-on resource for conventional operations, especially now that 110 wings of Pakistan's Frontier Corps (the country's virtual RR) have received operational experience and modern weaponry to make them force multipliers. That is a major reason why the RR cannot be disbanded or re-deployed for counter-insurgency tasks in Naxal-affected areas.

To claim victory over terror groups is premature also because the number of surrendered terrorists in the Valley (all with different shades of antipathy to the establishment) is much higher than the number of terrorists in holding camps and launch pads in PoK. None of the promises (by the state government or the police) to these surrendered terrorists has been fulfilled, creating a potential resource for home terror.

Gupta's most potent statement is, "Because its (the government's) politics is frozen, it has introduced an unprecedented new factor in Indian policymaking: a veto for the army". Seeking and giving professional military advice is a part of governance and on Siachen, Kashmir or Manipur, the army has offered just that. If you go by this accusation, every proposal by the army should have been accepted. In the case of Siachen, it is the trust deficit that prevents the vacation of the Saltoro Ridge; on the Armed Forces (Jammu and Kashmir) Special Powers Act, 1990, the government almost relented but the only organisation that offered a rationale for its retention was the army. Its arguments went well beyond the ordinary, explaining just how it was balancing hard and soft power in the emerging situation and just how the AFSPA was only an umbrella to be used in an emergency. The army likes a cemented victory and celebration for the people, not a half-baked one which gives adversaries reason for glee.

The general with five tenures in Kashmir who says the army is out of a job needs to revisit Kashmir. Not a single new golf course has come up and yes, guest rooms are indeed necessary to ensure that more armchair strategists visit Kashmir to be briefed at Keran, Machel, Gurez, Uri, Sopore, Tral and Shopian, before passing judgement on their professional army. Don't just visit Srinagar, Gulmarg and Pahalgam to make up your mind because the advice you will then proffer will never meet the professional needs of our army or that of our nation. Learn to trust your army — it is your army.

The writer Syed Ata Hasnain is a recently-retired Lt. General, is a former general officer commanding of the Srinagar-based 15 Corps




     



  PART THREE OF THREE PARTS


                          CHAPTER - 3




            "VIEWS OF A THINK TANK"

Source:
http://idsa.in/idsacomments/IsItTimetoWithdrawtheArmyfromKashmir_vchadha_131213



Is It Time to Withdraw the Army from Kashmir?
                                      By

                              Vivek Chadha

 

December 13, 2013 

 

       A study of insurgencies reveals that security forces tend to lose the support of intelligentsia and media, as the movement tends to prolong. It is often a result of either low levels of violence or casualties, beginning of an electoral process and the re-establishment of local administration machinery. More importantly, it is the result of missing the wood for the trees. This is especially true for Jammu and Kashmir (J&K).


A recent opinion piece by the Editor of a major national daily, argued that it is time for the withdrawal of the army from Kashmir. In his article, he alludes to the army vetoing government proposals on Siachen troops withdrawal and dilution of Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA). He contends that past conditions represented “a proxy war launched from Pakistan and they have been defeated”. He further adds that if “Hizb or Lashkar thugs again surface some place, you can easily confront them with overwhelming force within minutes.” Finally, in order to illustrate peace on ground, he quotes a figure of 17 security force casualties in 2012.1
The spirit of the article rightly highlights the need to build upon the peace dividend, offered by the relative conditions of peace in the state. The need for bold and imaginative political initiatives, as must always be the case for final settlement of popular discontentment, is also seconded without reservation. However, the reading of the situation and solutions offered indicates a rather simplistic understanding of conditions in India’s neighbourhood and within the state.



The assertion that the army can veto a government proposal on issues like Siachen or AFSPA, is either a case of misunderstanding of constitutional powers and privileges, or an under estimation of parliamentary democracy. The last sixty years have proved on more occasion than one that the armed forces remain firmly under the control of civilian leadership in India. It has also been seen that decision making remains a function of elected representatives, albeit with advice from various state organs. Therefore, while the advice of the army on both issues is in public domain to deduce that this advice functions as a veto, is a gross overestimation of the powers and influence of the men in uniform. The government receives inputs from various sources, as a prelude to decision making. Critical inputs are provided by intelligence agencies, as well as state and central administrative representatives. Army happens to be one amongst these agencies.


The article also declares defeat of Pakistan’s proxy war in J&K. This would be the likely conclusion, if the basis of assessments are the violence figures between 2008 and 2012 (Table 1).

Table 1 - Trends of Terrorist Violence in J&K

Year	Incidents	SFs Killed	Civilians Killed	Terrorists Killed
2005	1990	189	557	917
2006	1667	151	389	591
2007	1092	110	158	472
2008	708	75	91	339
2009	499	79	71	239
2010	488	69	47	232
2011	340	33	31	100
2012	220	15	15	72

Source: Annual Report 2012-13, Ministry of Home Affairs2



However, a careful analysis of existing circumstances belies these claims and can often throw up misleading results. A brief look at the increased violence figures along the LoC, not only highlights this paradox, but also provides a sign of times to come in 2014. 2013 witnessed the highest ceasefire violations in eight years.


 This was also accompanied by a sharp increase in security force casualties until August 18, 2013. By this time, 36 soldiers had already been killed, as compared to 15 during the complete 2012. This was also accompanied by higher numbers of successful infiltration, which is borne by an increase in security force casualties within the state. This is by no stretch of imagination a situation, which can be classified as return of normalcy in the state. The security situation in the state is not only linked with the conditions along the LoC but also geo-political realities in India’s neighbourhood.



A closer look at the events in the Af-Pak region suggest that the de-induction of US led forces from Afghanistan in 2014, is likely to become a tipping point for Pakistan to re-establish its control by proxy in that country. This could witness, a deflection of jehadi forces from Afghanistan towards their next battle ground in Kashmir. Irrespective of this possible deflection of jehadi forces, the end of war in Afghanistan is definitely likely to result in release of Pakistani forces deployed in the region and their re-deployment along traditional areas of the border with India. Both these factors will strengthen Pakistan’s ability to heighten tensions along the Line of Control (LoC), as also induct terrorists through vulnerable areas. This should in turn call for careful analysis and monitoring of the developing situation in India’s neighbourhood.
The call for de-induction of the army from the state is also misleading. The deployment in J&K follows a three tier pattern. The urban areas are provided security by the local police and central police forces. The rural hinterland has the deployment of Rashtriya Rifles (RR), which is a para military force. The army is deployed on the LoC, with the task of maintaining the territorial integrity of the country and stopping infiltration of terrorists. Therefore, any call for de-induction of the “army” is misleading. If it is presumed that the call actually pertains to the RR, then it needs careful analysis if its areas of deployment are peaceful enough for denudation of forces. It also needs to be questioned if the already stretched CRPF, which also looks after Naxal hit areas has the numbers and capacity to undertake this additional responsibility. The army has maintained for long that deployment in counterinsurgency areas adversely impacts its ability to concentrate on its primary role of guarding the nation’s borders. It is in the interest of the country and the army that the CRPF takes over these responsibilities. However, the question that begs an answer is, whether the CRPF is ready for this task?


The final assertion of the article deals with the ability to redeploy in case of an adverse situation in a matter of “minutes”. It needs to be understood that the mere deployment of a force is not a guarantee for its immediate effectiveness. Unlike flag marches in aid to civil authorities, deployment in terrorist infected areas requires the buildup of operational and intelligence network by units, which takes months if not years of diligent effort. Secondly, the initial deployment of security forces in an area is often referred to as the “kinetic” phase of operations, which is usually accompanied by heavier casualties and collateral damage, given the large presence of terrorists. Therefore, re-deployment is likely to be accompanied by not only greater security force casualties, but more importantly civilian ones as well. Therefore, any decision to de-induct forces must be deliberate, reasoned and well considered.






Over a period of time, some sections within the media and intelligentsia have misunderstood the army’s presence in disturbed areas as a reflection of its vested interests. It is time that the reality of its role and responsibility are better understood and articulated. The induction of the army in an internal security scenario is accompanied by the task of bringing violence down to levels, wherein, the elected representatives of the state and the administrative machinery can function effectively. At this stage, political negotiations attempt to find a respectable and long term solution to the problem at hand. Therefore, the timing of these negotiations and the call to undertake bold measures must be a decision guided by the elected representatives of the country. The army was and shall remain one of the cogs in the wheel that assists in the running of state machinery.


The reduction of the army’s numbers, visibility and presence must come. However, the prevailing realities in India’s neighbourhood, its impact on J&K, as well as the recent spurt in violence suggest that the time is not opportune for this decision. It would be appropriate to better understand the impact of US led de-induction from Afghanistan in 2014, along with the conditions both on the LoC and inside the state, before a decision on the issue is taken.


Views expressed are of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the IDSA or of the Government of India.

AUTH:

http://mha.nic.in/AnnualReports

 

 

Annual Reports

• Annual Report Ministry of Home Affairs 2012-2013. (6.43 MB)
• Annual Report Ministry of Home Affairs 2011-2012. (8.66 MB)
• Annual Report Ministry of Home Affairs 2010-2011. (16.48 MB)
• Annual Report Ministry of Home Affairs 2009-2010. (7.8 MB)
• Annual Report Ministry of Home Affairs 2008-2009. (6.8 MB)
• Annual Report Ministry of Home Affairs 2007-2008. (13.14 MB)
• Annual Report Ministry of Home Affairs 2006-2007.  (2.24 MB)
• Annual Report Ministry of Home Affairs 2005-2006. (1.85 MB)
• Annual Report Ministry of Home Affairs 2004-2005. (2.6 MB)
• Annual Report Ministry of Home Affairs 2003-2004. (1024 KB)

Last updated 22 October 2013 - 10:35am

 

INVITATION IESM : The Third Veterans Remembrance Day Seminar On Sunday, December 15, 2013

                                                  



                              INVITATION

              ALL ARE CORDIALLY INVITED




IESM : The Third Veterans Remembrance Day Seminar On Sunday, December 15, 2013


    

As has been our practice for the last two years, the Indian Ex-Servicemen Movement, Panchkula Branch plans to hold the Third Veterans Remembrance Day Seminar On Sunday, December 15, 2013 at The Jainendra Public School Auditorium, Sector-1, Panchkula, Haryana on Post-Independence Evolving Contours of the Indian Military Society.

 

 

Till independence, India didn’t have to worry about her military security. It was the prerogative of the British Crown. The Indian Army had no coherent nationalist ideology except for a consciousness of its history of loyal obedience, and valour under the foreign ruler. As India moved out of Britain’s orbit, her defence forces’ attempt at creating a robust structure was stymied because a severe shortage of trained Indian officers, and such as there were, though brought up in the British military mould had never experienced higher command.

 

 The officer corps is the active directing element of the military structure and is responsible for the military security of society.

 

 

The state is the active directing element of the society.

 

 

 In 1962, unfortunately both were not up to the task.

 

 

Post 1962 War, Indian defence forces was augmented, both numerically, and equipment-wise at a feverish pace, and this is what perhaps saved the country when faced with a war against Pakistan in 1965. The Indian defence forces also defeated Pakistan decisively in the 1971 War with a record bag of 93,000 prisoners of war. A long interregnum of peace followed till 1999.

 

 

With the 1999 Kargil War, many skeletons came tumbling out of the government and defence forces’ cupboard – lack of intelligence, equipment and ammunition shortages, and delayed employment of the Indian Air Force etc. It has been a long haul for the Indian defence forces from 1947 to the closing month of 2013. It has weathered many storms.

 From 1965 onwards, the country has seen a phenomenal increase in new raisings of the Central Police Forces. Despite this, there has been little decrease in the army’s employment on counter-insurgency tasks. From 1992 onwards about 1,300 women officers have been inducted into the armed forces. Higher educational levels have been mandated for recruitment to rank and file. Modernization and making up of the existing deficiencies of equipment has been a nightmare.

  On October 4, 2010, the then Indian Airforce Chief, Air Chief Marshal P.V. Naik said that 50 per cent of the IAF systems and equipment was obsolete and the force was facing a shortage of around 600 pilots.

For the last two-and-a-half decade, the Indian Army’s officer shortfall continues to fluctuate between 10,500 to 13,000. Lately, there have been some cases of worrisome tension in officers and men relations. In 2012, a news report appearing in the Indian Express alleged that the then Army Chief General V. K. Singh had stealthily tried moving troops and tanks to Delhi to pressurise the government on a personal matter.

 

 

The armed forces are a proper functional society within the larger civil society coterminous with the state, with boundaries separating the two. Both are incomplete without the other. Central to the issue is that the officer corps, as the active intelligent component of the Indian military society interrogates itself and the military society holistically.

 

 

Any society is a complex organism, and can hardly be deliberated upon in a one day seminar. Only following sub-themes are sought to be discussed during the current seminar:

 

 

·        Session 1 . The services have conspicuously failed to obtain adequate and timely resources for new raisings, vital defence equipment, and infrastructure. Sometimes, it appears like a total lack influence over governmental machinery by the senior service hierarchy. While deflecting of blame comes naturally, is it also because the services, in military straitjackets have not learnt how to work the democratic system of governance?

 

 

·        Session 2. Women officers made a late entry into the hallowed male bastion of the Indian military in 1992, and have kicked up a veritable storm. Do women actually want equality in serving in the military? From female advocacy point, the answer is obvious. From another perspective, the answer is far from clear. Is military service just another job? And yet, in the changing technological scenario, women may be more suitable than men in certain tasks.

 

 

·         Session 3. Democracy and free flow of media led information has enhanced human aspirations. Lately inter-personal relationship has increasingly come under strain. Decidedly, there is an elemental of coercion in enforcing the services disciplinary code. Shouldn’t the services man management models, disciplinary methodologies and laws be reviewed keeping in view the latest sociological changes?

 

 

 

Programme         Inauguration and First Session.        10 a.m. to 1.30 p.m.

                             Lunch                                      1.30 p.m. to 2.15 p.m.

                             Post- lunch Sessions                2.15 p.m. to 4.30 p.m.

                             Tea                                          4..30 p.m. to 5 p.m.

 

 

 

All veterans,  interested scholars, and citizens of the Tri-City are invited. Do keep your calendar free for this important veterans event, and do inform your friends and colleagues also. Ladies are cordially invited.

 

With regards,

 

Brig. Kiran Krishan, SM (Retd.)

Convener, IESM, Panchkula

Mobile: 9876116898









 

IESM Rally at AMBALA on 22 Dec 13‏

                






                IESM Rally at AMBALA on 22 Dec 13‏

  

 

Dear Veterans

 

IESM has planned a big rally at Amabala in coordination with All India Ex-servicemen Association (JCOs and ORs) of Ambala. All India Ex-servicemen Association has about 35000 to 40000 members all over India. Chairman Ex Servicemen Association  Piara Singh Pannu has pledged full support to IESM. 

 

 

Ex-servicemen rally is planned at Ambala from 1030h to 1400h at Gandhi Ground at Ambala Cantt. Gen VK Singh PVSM, AVSM, YSM, ADC former COAS will also be addressing the rally. 

 

 

All ex-servicemen are requested to attend the rally in large numbers and make this rally successful. This is the time for ex-servicemen to show their unity and present  a united and strong face of ex-servicemen to the Government.

Ex-servicemen are in this present state only because we have not been united. Government and politicians understand only language of vote bank and we must show them that ex-servicemen have a very large vote bank. Ex-servicemen unitedly control FOUR crore votes and if these votes are used judiciously ex-servicemen can influence the result of 140 to 150 parliamentary constituencies and about 400 assemblies constituencies in states. Now that the serving soldier has been permitted to vote on place of posting the importance of soldiers/ex-servicemen has increased many folds. This is the time to make sure that ex-servicemen are taken seriously and accepted as  important part of the society and given their dues.

 

The present political scene has completely changed  with the results of assembly election in four states. In these four states electorate has expressed their choice and sent a strong message that the people of this country can elect the Govt which will work for the people of India, it is therefore important for ex-servicemen to also send a strong message to political parties. This can be done with a large number of ex-servicemen attending the rally at Ambala on 22 Dec 13.

 

 

IESM REQUESTS ALL EX-SERVICEMEN TO COME OUT IN LARGE NUMBERS TO ATTEND THE RALLY AT AMBALA ON 22 DEC 13 SUNDAY AND MAKE THEIR PRESENCE FELT TO ALL POLITICAL PARTIES. 

 

IESM FEELS THIS IS THE MOST OPPORTUNE MOMENT FOR EX-SERVICEMEN TO EXPRESS THEIR VIEWS AND PRESENT THEIR DEMANDS AND PRESS FOR THEIR ACCEPTANCE,

 

LARGE STRENGTH IN THE RALLY WILL SEND A VERY STRONG MESSAGE TO GOVT THAT IF THEY WANT OUR VOTE THE GOVT WILL HAVE TO ACCEDE TO EX-SERVICEMEN DEMAND OF OROP AND TREAT ALL EX-SERVICEMEN WITH RESPECT.

 

ALL EX-SERVICEMEN ARE REQUESTED TO DONATE FUNDS TO SUPPORT THIS RALLY AND MAKE IT SUCCESSFUL.

 

DEAR EX-SERVICEMEN TIME HAS COME FOR YOU TO ACT. IT IS NOW OR NEVER. EXPRESS YOURSELF BY DONATING AND ATTENDING THIS RALLY IN LARGE NUMBERS. 

 

Bank details for sending donation are given below.

 

 

BANK DETAILS - IESM

Name of Account: Indian Ex Servicemen Movement

Account No: 06162000001330

Name of Bank: HDFC Bank

Nine Digit MICR Code of Bank: 110240109

IFSC Code No (for e-transfer): HDFC 0000616

Postal Address of Bank: Palam Vihar Branch, SCO 87, Sector 22, Gurgaon–122001

 

You may send a cheque/DD, deposit directly in above account in your local HDFC Branch, or do an e-transfer. Please send us the filled Membership or Donation form(s) by post.

 

Please address your emails on the above matter to the following email IDs:

Wg Cdr CK Sharma at seekayess@gmail.com

Maj Gen Satbir Singh at satbirsm@gmail.com

Gp Capt VK Gandhi at vk_gandhi@yahoo.com

 

Regards

Gp Capt VK Gandhi VSM
Gen Sec IESM
L - 48, Sector - 25,
NOIDA. 201301
Tele no 01204313951
Mobile   09810541222

Pls see IESM latest NEWS on http://www.iesm.org

IF YOU SEE SOMEONE WITHOUT A SMILE GIVE HIM ONE OF YOURS.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

WHO IS LYING. KAPIL SIBAL OR REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES

                 WHO IS LYING.  KAPIL SIBAL
                                            OR   
                  REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES



                   AAP CABINET MINISTER HO!!!!!!!!






















              Who's lying, Kapil Sibal or ROC?

   A lying, duplicitous law minister of India,  
               skirting with legal definitions?


    

http://indiatoday.intoday.in/slideshows/who-is-lying-kapil-sibal-or-roc-tehelka.html