MARITIME : Indian Overseas Military Bases

SOURCE:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMT-VlU9cjU



               Indian Overseas Military Bases
               That Influence In Other Countries 

        

Global Conflict

 

 

 

                                 [  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMT-VlU9cjU  ]

 

 

 

 

 

 

Published on Apr 25, 2016

 

This video shows you the list of Indian Overseas Military Bases That Influence In Other Countries.
1.Madagascar - A listening publish of Indian military started its operations around 2007. The monitoring station gives India with electronic eyes & ears within the southwestern Indian Ocean. Placed in northern Madagascar, it's miles related with similar facilities in Kochi & Mumbai. It's far useful for gathering intelligence on overseas navies operations within the area.

2.Mozambique - Indian army took fee of Mozambique's sea protection throughout the African Union summit of 2003. It regularly patrols the waters round Mozambique to preserve piracy in take a look at.

Three.Seychelles - Seychelles taken care of Indian military help for anti-piracy operations in its waters & Indian military patrols its EEZ.

4.Oman - India has installation a naval air base in Muscat, Oman. Additionally Indian military has berthing rights there.

Five.Qatar - underneath the historical protection cooperation p.C. Of 2008 India has devoted its navy assets to shield Qatar from outside threats. Officials said approximately this % as "just brief of stationing troops on floor".

6. Tajikistan - Farkhor Air Base located in Tajikistan has an Indian Air force presence on the grounds that lengthy. This is IAF's most effective foreign base lively.

7. Nepal - India has long stated that any assault on Nepal might be taken into consideration as an attack on India & committed itself to the protection of this landlocked kingdom. It become mentioned in 2009 that India is going to assemble an air base in Surkhet for IAF's operation (not certain if is active). India is likewise the biggest hands provider to Nepal.

Eight. Vietnam - Indian navy has berthing rights in Vietnam & regularly offers port call there. They have got a terrific security cooperation to maintain a watch on China.

9. Maldives - A small island state which became saved from outdoor coup by means of immediately armed intervention through India, Maldives is now under India's security grid. India has set up radars on all 26 atolls of Maldives & networked with Indian coastal radar gadget. Indian coast guards regularly conducts sorties & patrols in Maldivian waters to hold its safety intact.

10.Bhutan - Bhutan is totally below Indian defense cover. India has sizable have an impact on over this landlocked u . S . A . As it's miles surrounded by India on 3 facets. For air cowl & help, Bhutan is depending on IAF's jap air command. The Indian army maintains a schooling mission in Bhutan called IMTRAT (Indian navy schooling team), liable for army training to Bhutan navy. India is also answerable for supplying of palms & constructing strategic roads in Bhutan.
army bases, army posts, military base, military bases, marine bases, army bases overseas, army post, army bases around the world, military overseas pay, overseas army bases, list of army bases
Source: wikipedia.org

Channel Link: youtube.com/c/GlobalConflict7











 

MARITIME GEOPOLTICS : China-Pakistan Economic Corridor: Should India Worry?

SOURCE:
http://www.eurasiareview.com/28052016-china-pakistan-economic-corridor-should-india-worry-analysis/

            China-Pakistan Economic Corridor:

                 Should India Worry? – Analysis

                                            By

                   Pramod Jaiswal and Aditi Paul*

                           South Asia Monitor

 

May 28, 2016

 

 

 

Pakistan's Gwadar Port. Photo by Paranda, Wikipedia Commons.

 

 

  

The groundbreaking ceremony for the new expressway, linking Peshawar and Karachi, was held on the first week of May this year in Pakistan. It is the single biggest transit project planned for the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) which is a key project of China’s “One Belt, One Road Initiative”. The Peshawar–Karachi expressway will be 392 kilometers long, with a total contract cost of USD 2.9 billion, with a designed speed of 120 kilometers per hour. The construction of this huge infrastructure in Pakistan with Chinese investment has raised India’s security concerns. In this context, it would be worthwhile to understand CPEC, the feasibility of the project, China’s vested interest, strategic moves or calculations of the Pakistan Army, and the impact on India’s national interest.


Regionalism has failed to take off in South Asia due to political differences, congeneric economies, socio-religious cleavages and deep rooted conflicts between the states, particularly India and Pakistan. These differences have not only created an obstacle for proper galvanization of interest both within and around South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC), but its procedural and operational products, such as the South Asian Free Trade Area (SAFTD) and other regional economic agreements are also suffering from lack of commitment. As a result, the member states of SAARC have chosen to collaborate with extra-regional powers in various bilateral and trilateral engagements. China has shown special interests in South Asia and the potential vast market that the region provides. However, it is the emerging power’s most ambitious geo-political and economically significant initiative called ‘One Belt, One Road’ (OBOR) that has necessitated China to befriend states of Asia, Europe, Middle East and Africa. It is through OBOR that China is building roads, railways, pipelines, communication networks and industrial economic zones for connecting and expanding its partnerships beyond Asia.


One such connecting thread in OBOR is the CPEC. It connects West China with Arabian Sea and seeks to economically transform the area from Pakistan to China’s north western Xinjiang province through a network of highways, railways and pipelines spreading across 3000 kilometers. CPEC provides China the opportunity to access the Arabian Sea and the Indian Ocean. According to the five year development plan of China, CPEC values 17 percent of Pakistan’s GDP and has the capacity to generate more than 25000MW of electricity to the energy starved Pakistan.


Mega projects, like CPEC, require secure and stable environment for not just its construction but to reap its sustainable benefits. Pakistan is beset with political, economic, socio-cultural and security issues. And, it seems there is no safety for the USD 46 billion investment. Nawaz Sharif government believes that, if implemented successfully, CPEC will be a game-changer. It will provide economic growth and help to overcome threats from terrorism. But, the successful implementation of CPEC depends on the political situation of Pakistan. The state is entrenched with inter-provincial conflicts. There are repeated distress raised by the provinces on the massive and unequal distribution of resources, and non-transparent nature of the government’s actions on CPEC.


On the other hand, the Pakistani business communities believe that they are in a non-benefitting situation and the cheap Chinese products will harm the indigenous manufacturers. The economists argue that since the Chinese imports will have reduced or no taxes; there is a possibility that Pakistan’s economy will be negatively impacted and a steep decline in the revenue collection is estimated. In addition, the federal government of Pakistan has promised to build the western route so as to benefit Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, but its implementation is unlikely. As a result, CPEC is facing less encouragement from the political and economic stakeholders, and local people. Added to which, the whole Pakistan-China collaboration is being touted as Nawaz’s own political ambition.


Considering the conflict ridden state in Pakistan, China demands support and encouragement from the Pakistan army generals. Pakistan’s army has always played a dominant role in shaping and guiding Pakistan’s foreign and security policy. The state has sailed through four military coups since its independence in 1947. Interestingly, the Pakistan Army has taken special interest in this project. It called for installing a CPEC Authority for efficient plan execution. Over 15000 troops have been set up for overlooking the security of the Chinese workers and contractors involved in upgrading the transit facilities based in Balochistan, the stronghold of Afghan and Pakistan Taliban forces. However, it is argued that the greater involvement of the army vis-à-vis developmental projects with the external powers may heighten the ever-present civil-military tensions in Pakistan.


It is no secret that Pakistan is a breeding ground for dissensions and rebel groups. It becomes tedious then for viable bilateral and multilateral projects to work and sustain. For example, the Baloch rebels have constantly opposed the CPEC, and threaten to attack the people involved and destroy the infrastructures. Yet, projects like CPEC are important for the growth and prosperity of Pakistan. The proposed corridor and a place in the OBOR plan, has brought economic and strategic implications for Pakistan. As a result, crucial steps have beeb taken to remove obstacles in the path of CPEC. According to Media reports, the China Great Wall Industry Cooperation and the Pakistan Space and Upper Atmosphere Research Commission have signed an agreement to install a Pakistan Remote Sensing Satellite (PRSS-1) System, to be launched in June 2018, for safeguarding and monitoring the execution of the plan.


Amidst these developments in the neighborhood, India is alarmed. It has objected to CPEC on the grounds that it runs through the disputed territory – Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK). India has claimed that three divisions of the Chinese Army are stationed in the PoK. Yet, there is clear lack of public debate on the impact of CPEC on India. The strategic thinkers need to articulate a clear stand on the situation because after the CPEC completes, China would have total access to the state of Pakistan and not just to PoK. Therefore, the solution lies in aligning India with its ‘strategic partners’ and devise a pragmatic move at the earliest.


*Dr Pramod Jaiswal is Senior Research Officer at Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies, New Delhi and Aditi Paul is Research Scholar at Nelson Mandela Center for Peace and Conflict Resolution, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi. They can be reached at: editor@spsindia.in

TOPICS:

China  East Asia   Economics  India  OBOR   Pakistan 

Silk Road     South Asia     Trade

About the Author

South Asia Monitor

South Asia Monitor is an independent web journal and online resource dealing with strategic, political, security, cultural and economic issues about, pertaining to and of consequence to South Asia and the whole Indo-Pacific region. Developed for South Asia watchers across the globe or those looking for in-depth knowledge, reliable resource and documentation on this region, the site features exclusive commentaries, insightful analyses, interviews and reviews contributed by strategic experts, diplomats, journalists, analysts, researchers and students from not only this region but all over the world. It also aggregates news and views content related to the region.

• Previous post

 

• Next post

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SIACHEN : Line of Duty:

SOURCE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acj5g21Dku0



 [  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acj5g21Dku0  ]

Published on Feb 14, 2016

Watch: "Promise Vs Delivery | Budget Debate With Arnab Goswami"
→ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dMlpM...
-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-

After nine soldiers died in Siachen after being buried alive in an avalanche that struck their post on the world's highest battlefield, the focus is back on Siachen and its difficult terrain, extremely poor and harsh conditions in which our soldiers defy nature in the line of duty. While Lance Naik Hanamanthappa Koppad was miraculously dug out alive, the bodies of nine others were recovered on February 9. Koppad, who was admitted to Army hospital after being rescued alive three days ago from beneath tonnes of snow six days after an avalanche hit his post in Siachen at an altitude of 19,600 feet, died on February 11. In this episode of Latitude with Maroof Raza, Strategic Affairs Expert; Shekhar Dutt, Former Defence Secretary; and Nitin Gokhale, Journalist & Author -- know the dispute attached with Saichen, and why it is stategically important defence post for India.

   [  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ej13CRjOyjs ]

Published on Jan 20, 2013

This is a base where only men with guts of steel volunteer to come and serve and when they leave the Siachen glacier they walk with their head hell high with the expression that men apart each man who is been here is an emperor. Over the next half hour in this episode, we will show you how the gunner boss of the caliber of his guns, the engineer of his construction, the signal men of his communication, and above all else, it is the infantry men on those icy heights of the Saltoro Range, who stands silently with victory under their feet

 

war 1965 :Indo-Pakistani War 1965 Full Documentary By Discovery HD*

SOURCE:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNVydwb9DRE

     Indo-Pakistani War 1965 Full Documentary

 

 

    [ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNVydwb9DRE ]

 

 

 

 

 

Indo-Pakistani War 1965 Full Documentary

 

 

Published on Feb 16, 2016

 

The aim of the attack was to seize the key Grand Trunk Road around Wazirabad and the capture of Jassoran which would enable domination of Sialkot-Pasrur railway, thus completely cutting off Pakistani supply line.[17] The striking force of the Indian 1st Corps was the 1st Armoured Division supported by the 14th Infantry and 6th Mountain divisions and Indian infantry seized the border area on 7 September. This was followed by a short engagement at Jassoran in which Pakistan lost 10 tanks and ensured complete Indian domination of Sialkot-Pasrur railway.[17] Realising the threat, the Pakistani rushed two regiments of their 6th Armoured Division from Chhamb to the Sialkot sector to support the Pakistani 7th Infantry Division there. These units, plus an independent tank destroyer squadron, amounted to 135 tanks; 24 M47 and M48 Pattons, about 15 M36B1s and the remainder Shermans. The majority of the Pattons belonged to the new 25th Cavalry commanded by Lt. Col. Nisar, which was sent to the Chawinda area. Fighting around the Gadgor village between the Indian 1 Armoured division and the Pakistani 25th Cavalry Regiment resulted in the Indian advance being stopped.

The Indian plan was to drive a wedge between Sialkot and the 6th Armoured Division. In fact there was only a single regiment there at the time. The Indian 1st Armoured Division's drive quickly divided, with the 43rd Lorried Infantry Brigade supported by a tank regiment attacking Gat, while the main blow of the 1st Armoured Brigade was hurled against Phillaura. Pakistani air attacks caused moderate damage to the tank columns, but exacted a heavier toll on the truck columns and infantry. The terrain features of the area were very different from those around Lahore, being quite dusty, and the approach of the Indian attack was evident to the 25th Cavalry by the rising dust columns on the Charwah-Phillaura road.

The Indians resumed their attacks on 10 September with multiple corps sized assaults and succeeded in pushing the Pakistani forces back to their base at Chawinda, where they were stopped. A Pakistani counterattack at Phillorah was repulsed with heavy damage, and the Pakistanis settled in defensive positions. The Pakistani position at this point was highly perilous, the Indians outnumbered them by ten to one.

However, the Pakistani situation improved as reinforcements arrived, consisting of two independent brigades from Kashmir, 8 Infantry Division, and most crucially, their 1 Armoured Division. For the next several days, Pakistani forces repulsed Indian attacks on Chawinda. A large Indian assault on 18 September involving India's 1st Armoured and 6th Mountain Divisions was repelled, with the Indian 1st Armoured and 6th Mountain divisions taking heavy losses. On 21 September the Indians withdrew to a defensive position near their original bridgehead, with the retreat of Indian first armoured division, all their offensives were ceased on that front.[18] Pakistani General vetoed the proposed counterattack "Operation Windup", According to the Pakistani C in C the operation was cancelled since ‘both sides had suffered heavy tank losses......would have been of no strategic importance....’ and above all ‘the decision...was politically motivated as by then the Government of Pakistan had made up their mind to accept cease fire and foreign sponsored proposals’

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HISTORY : Outline of South Asian history

SOURCE:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outline_of_South_Asian_history




                 Outline of South Asian History

               [ CONNECT WITH:
                           http://bcvasundhra.blogspot.in/2016/05/list-of-wars-involving-india_1.html  ]

The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to the history of South Asia:
History of South Asia – South Asia includes the contemporary political entities of the Indian subcontinent and associated islands, therefore, its history includes the histories of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Afghanistan, Bhutan, and the island nations of Sri Lanka and the Maldives.

Contents

 [hide] 

• 1 History of South Asia, by period
  • 1.1 Prehistory of South Asia
    • 1.1.1 Riwatian people
    • 1.1.2 Soanian people
    • 1.1.3 South Asian Stone Age
  • 1.2 South Asian Bronze Age
  • 1.3 Iron Age India
  • 1.4 Middle kingdoms of India
  • 1.5 Medieval India
  • 1.6 Early modern period
  • 1.7 Colonial India
  • 1.8 Other states
  • 1.9 Kingdoms of Sri Lanka
• 2 History of South Asia, by region
• 3 History of South Asia, by subject
• 4 See also
• 5 Notes
• 6 Sources

History of South Asia, by period[edit]

• Timeline of South Asian history

Prehistory of South Asia[edit]

• South Asian Stone Age
• South Asian Bronze Age
• South Asian Iron Age
  • Vedic period
  • Mahajanapadas

Riwatian people[edit]

• Riwatian people   (1,900,000 BP)

Soanian people[edit]

• Soanian people   (500,000 BP)

South Asian Stone Age[edit]

South Asian Stone Age   (50,000–3000 BCE)

• Bhirrana Culture   (7570-6200 BCE)
• Mehrgarh Culture   (7000–3300 BCE)

South Asian Bronze Age[edit]

South Asian Bronze Age   (3000–1300 BCE)

• Indus Valley Civilization   (3300–1700 BCE)
  • Early Harappan Culture   (3300–2600 BCE)
  • Mature Harappan Culture   (2600–1900 BCE)
• Ochre Coloured Pottery culture   (from 2000 BCE)
• Vedic period   (1750–1200 BCE)
  • Late Harappan Culture   (1700–1300 BCE)
• Swat culture   (1600–500 BCE)
  • Black and Red ware culture   (1300–1200 BCE)

Iron Age India[edit]

Iron Age   (1200–230 BCE)

• Vedic period   (1200–500 BCE)
  • Black and Red ware culture   (1200–1000 BCE)
  • Painted Grey Ware culture   (1200–600 BCE)
  • Janapadas   (1200–600 BCE)
  • Northern Black Polished Ware   (700–200 BCE)
• Haryanka Kingdom   (684–424 BCE)
• Maha Janapadas   (600–300 BCE)
• Pandyan Kingdom (600 BCE– 1650 CE)
• Achaemenid Empire   (550–330 BCE)
• Magadha Kingdom   (500–321 BCE)
• Ror Kingdom   (450 BCE–489 CE)
• Nanda Empire   (424–321 BCE)
• Shishunaga Kingdom   (413–345 BCE)
• Macedonian Empire   (330–323 BCE)
• Maurya Empire   (321–184 BCE)
• Seleucid Empire   (312–63 BCE)
• Chera Kingdom   (300 BCE–1102 CE)
• Chola Empire   (300 BCE–1279 CE)
• Pallava Empire   (250 BCE–800 CE)
• Maha-Megha-Vahana Empire   (250 BCE–400 CE)
• Parthian Empire   (247 BCE–224 CE)

Middle kingdoms of India[edit]

Middle kingdoms of India   (Classical period) (230 BCE–1279CE)

• Satavahana Empire   (230 BCE–220 CE)
• Kuninda Kingdom   (200 BCE–300 CE)
• Indo-Scythian Kingdom   (200 BCE–400 CE)
• Shunga Empire   (185–73 BCE)
• Indo-Greek Kingdom   (180 BCE–10 CE)
• Kanva Empire   (75–26 BCE)
• Indo-Parthian Kingdom   (21–130s CE)
• Western Satrap Empire   (35–405 CE)
• Kushan Empire   (60–240 CE)
• Bharshiva Dynasty   (170–350 CE)
• Nagas of Padmavati   (210–340 CE)
• Sasanian Empire   (224–651 CE)
• Indo-Sassanid Kingdom   (230–360 CE)
• Vakataka Empire   (250s–6th century CE)
• Kalabhras Empire   (250–600 CE)
• Gupta Empire   (280–550 CE)
• Kadamba Empire   (345–525 CE)
• Western Ganga Kingdom   (350–1000 CE)
• Kamarupa Kingdom   (350–1100 CE)
• Vishnukundina Empire   (420–624 CE)
• Maitraka Empire   (475–767 CE)
• Huna Kingdom   (475–576 CE)
• Rai Kingdom   (489–632 CE)
• Shahi Empire   (6th century–1026 CE)
• Chalukya Empire   (543–753 CE)
• Maukhari Empire   (550s–8th century CE)
• Harsha Empire   (606–647 CE)
• Tibetan Empire   (618–841 CE)
• Eastern Chalukya Kingdom   (624–1075 CE)
• Rashidun Caliphate   (632–661 CE)
• Gurjara-Pratihara Empire   (650–1036 CE)
• Umayyad Caliphate   (661–750 CE)
• Pala Empire   (750–1174 CE)
• Rashtrakuta Empire   (753–982 CE)
• Paramara Kingdom   (800–1327 CE)
• Yadava Empire   (850–1334 CE)
• Solanki Kingdom   (942–1244 CE)
• Western Chalukya Empire   (973–1189 CE)
• Lohara Kingdom   (1003–1320 CE)
• Hoysala Empire   (1040–1346 CE)
• Sena Empire   (1070–1230 CE)
• Eastern Ganga Empire   (1078–1434 CE)
• Kakatiya Kingdom   (1083–1323 CE)
• Kalachuri Empire   (1130–1184 CE)

Medieval India[edit]

Late medieval period   (1206–1596)

• Delhi Sultanate   (1206–1526 CE)
  • Mamluk Sultanate   (1206–1290 CE)
  • Khilji Sultanate   (1290–1320 CE)
  • Tughlaq Sultanate   (1320–1414 CE)
  • Sayyid Sultanate   (1414–1451 CE)
  • Lodi Sultanate   (1451–1526 CE)
• Ahom Kingdom   (1228–1826 CE)
• Reddy Kingdom   (1325–1448 CE)
• Vijayanagara Empire   (1336–1646 CE)
• Gajapati Kingdom   (1434–1541 CE)
• Deccan Sultanates   (1490–1596 CE)

Early modern period[edit]

Early modern period   (1526–1858)

• Mughal Empire   (1526–1858 CE)
  • Sur Empire   (1540–1556 CE)
• Maratha Empire   (1674–1818 CE)
• Durrani Empire   (1747–1823 CE)
• Sikh Empire   (1799–1849 CE)

Colonial India[edit]

Colonial period   (1510–1961 CE)

• Portuguese India   (1510–1961 CE)
• Dutch India   (1605–1825 CE)
• Danish India   (1620–1869 CE)
• French India   (1759–1954 CE)
• Company Raj   (1757–1858 CE)
• British Raj   (1858–1947 CE)
• Partition of India   (1947 CE)

Other states[edit]

Other states (1102–1947)

• Zamorin Kingdom   (1102–1766 CE)
• Sutiya Kingdom   (1187-1673 CE)
• Deva Kingdom   (12th century–13th century CE)
• Chitradurga Kingdom   (1300–1779 CE)
• Garhwal Kingdom   (1358–1803 CE)
• Mysore Kingdom   (1399–1947 CE)
• Keladi Kingdom   (1499–1763 CE)
• Koch Kingdom   (1515–1947 CE)
• Thondaiman Kingdom   (1650–1948 CE)
• Madurai Kingdom   (1559–1736 CE)
• Thanjavur Kingdom   (1572–1918 CE)
• Marava Kingdom   (1600–1750 CE)
• Sikh Confederacy   (1707–1799 CE)
• Travancore Kingdom   (1729–1947 CE)

Kingdoms of Sri Lanka[edit]

Kingdoms of Sri Lanka

• Kingdom of Tambapanni   (543–505 BCE)
• Kingdom of Upatissa Nuwara   (505–377 BCE)
• Anuradhapura Kingdom   (377 BCE–1017 CE)
• Kingdom of Ruhuna   (200 CE)
• Kingdom of Polonnaruwa   (300–1310 CE)
• Jaffna Kingdom   (1215–1624 CE)
• Kingdom of Dambadeniya   (1220–1272 CE)
• Kingdom of Yapahuwa   (1272–1293 CE)
• Kingdom of Kurunegala   (1293–1341 CE)
• Kingdom of Gampola   (1341–1347 CE)
• Kingdom of Raigama   (1347–1415 CE)
• Kingdom of Kotte   (1412–1597 CE)
• Kingdom of Sitawaka   (1521–1594 CE)
• Kingdom of Kandy   (1469–1815 CE)
• Portuguese Ceylon   (1505–1658 CE)
• Dutch Ceylon   (1656–1796 CE)
• British Ceylon   (1815–1948 CE)

History of South Asia, by region[edit]

• History of Afghanistan
• History of Bangladesh (See History of Bangladesh after independence for post-1971 history)
• History of Bhutan
• History of India for pre-1947 history.
  • Timeline of Indian history
  • History of Andhra Pradesh
  • History of Arunachal Pradesh
  • History of Assam
  • History of Bihar
  • History of Chhattisgarh
  • History of Goa
  • History of Gujarat
  • History of Haryana
  • History of Himachal Pradesh
  • History of Jammu and Kashmir
  • History of Jharkhand
  • History of Karnataka
  • History of Kerala
  • History of Madhya Pradesh
  • History of Maharashtra
  • History of Manipur
  • History of Meghalaya
  • History of Mizoram
  • History of Nagaland
  • History of Odisha
  • History of Punjab
  • History of Rajasthan
  • History of Sikkim
  • History of Tamil Nadu
  • History of Telangana
  • History of Tripura
  • History of Uttar Pradesh
  • History of Uttarakhand
  • History of West Bengal
  • History of the Republic of India for post-1947 history
• History of the Maldives
• History of Nepal
• History of Pakistan
  • Pakistan studies
  • History of Azad Kashmir
  • History of Balochistan, Pakistan
  • History of Gilgit–Baltistan
  • History of Islamabad
  • History of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
  • History of the Punjab
  • History of Sindh
  • History of the Federally Administered Tribal Areas
• History of Sri Lanka
• History of British Indian Ocean Territory

History of South Asia, by subject[edit]

• History of architecture in South Asia
  • History of South Asian domes
• Coinage of India
• History of South Asian cuisine
• Timeline of cultivation and domestication in South and West Asia
• Economic history of India
• History of education in the Indian subcontinent
• Execution by elephant
• Genetics and archaeogenetics of South Asia
• Timeline of Hindu clan conversions to Islam
• Indian literature
• Indian maritime history
• Military history of India
• List of Indian monarchs
• Indology
• Linguistic history of the Indian subcontinent
• Timeline of mathematical innovation in South and West Asia
• History of metallurgy in South Asia
• History of science and technology in South Asia

See also[edit]

SAARC portal

• Greater India
• History of Asia
• History of Central Asia
• History of East Asia
• History of Southeast Asia
• Former subdivisions of Pakistan
• Partition of India

Notes[edit]

Sources[edit]

• Flood, Gavin D. (1996), An Introduction to Hinduism, Cambridge University Press 
• Hiltebeitel, Alf (2002), Hinduism. In: Joseph Kitagawa, "The Religious Traditions of Asia: Religion, History, and Culture", Routledge 
• Michaels, Axel (2004), Hinduism. Past and present, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press 
• Samuel, Geoffrey (2010), The Origins of Yoga and Tantra. Indic Religions to the Thirteenth Century, Cambridge University Press 

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Outline_of_South_Asian_history&oldid=710932312"

Categories:

• South Asia
• History of South Asia

 

Edit links

• This page was last modified on 19 March 2016, at 22:52.