Showing posts with label AFS ARMs PROCUREMENT. Show all posts
Showing posts with label AFS ARMs PROCUREMENT. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 8, 2017

PROCUREMENT : Indian Army Launches Global Hunt for Advanced Sniper Rifle Night Sights (R)

SOURCE:
https://sputniknews.com/military/201710311058695818-india-army-night-sights/




An Indian army soldier explains the use of a Sniper Rifle to university students (File)

Indian Army Launches Global Hunt for Advanced Sniper Rifle Night Sights








Indian Army Launches Global Hunt

                     for 

Advanced Sniper Rifle Night Sights





In order to minimize casualties during

 cross-border firings, the Indian Army, of 

late, has been equipping its weapons' 

systems with long-range sight vision that 

can detect targets at a distance of at least 

1,300 meters.



NEW DELHI (Sputnik) — In a bid to enhance the night capability of its infantry deployed along the border, the Indian Army has floated a requirement for 5,500 long-range night sights for sniper rifles which can detect enemy from a minimum distance of 1,300 meter,. Since most modern rifles and tanks now have night fighting capability, swift movement of mechanized forces is now possible during the night as well.




The sight should have suitable reticle pattern that enables aiming up to 1,200 meters in order to facilitate the night firing of 8.6mm (0.338 inches) sniper. This is very critical in the backdrop of persistent cross-border violation along the western border which takes a heavy toll of the Indian troops.

"The Indian Army seeks uncooled thermal imaging night sight with the latest technology parameters in order to help the soldier to fire the 8.6mm sniper rifle accurately. The sight should be able to fit on MIL STD 1913 compliant Picatinny rail," an Indian Army official told Sputnik.
The tender for purchase of approximately 5,500-night sights is expected to be issued in June 2018. In the past, India had imported Thermal Imaging (TI) sights for T 72 tanks from Poland. These are also available in some other countries like France, Israel, Russia, Ukraine and the USA.



Apart from equipping the sniper rifles with long range night sights, sources told Sputnik that the Army is going to issue a tender to purchase 15,000 uncooled thermal imaging sights for its 84 mm Carl Gustaf rocket launcher which is the standard anti-tank weapon sanctioned to each Infantry platoon. The long-range night sights will be able to detect rival tanks and other enemy assets from a minimum distance of 1,200 meter,. The Indian Army will use this to destroy the enemy's armored vehicles, concrete bunkers, landing craft, and aircraft. Presently, the Carl Gustaf cannot fire in the dark if the target area is not illuminated.








Sunday, January 8, 2017

Agni Trials: By Threatening India over test-firing of ICBMs, China has revealed its Insecurity (R)

SOURCE:
http://www.firstpost.com/world/agni-trials-by-threatening-india-over-test-firing-of-icbms-china-has-revealed-its-insecurity-3193010.html



Agni Trials: By Threatening India over test-firing of ICBMs, China has revealed its Insecurity

 



Jan 7, 2017

 There is something curious about the latest round of confrontation between India and China on the former's final testing of an intercontinental ballistic missile. It's not as if that by testing one ICBM, albeit with a capacity to carry a nuclear warhead into Chinese mainland, India has caught up with China's military might and drew parity with their vastly superior strategic nuclear weaponry.


With a GDP five times that of India's and a defence budget that at $150 billion outstrips India's by four times, China is bent upon world domination and dreams of replacing US as the next global superpower.



It therefore sounded a little jarring when Chinese media on Thursday in.dulged in nakedly aggressive posturing over India's final test-firing of Agni-IV and played its Pakistan card rather openly, warning India that more missile testing will develop into an arms race in south Asia because it won't shy away from arming Islamabad to match India's arsenal
This represents an interesting new deviation in Chinese policy. Though this wasn't an "official response" to India's flight-testing of Agni-IV that carries a strike range of 4,000km, the country's state-run media is traditionally used to convey messages that are considered too incendiary for official conduits. The diplomatic reaction, transmitted through China's foreign ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying, wasn't too staid either as Beijing accused India of breaking UNSC resolutions through the testing of ballistic missile.
Under President Xi Jinping, China has long given Deng Xiaoping's '24-character strategy' a quiet burial in favour of a muscular, assertive foreign policy but that geopolitical aggression is usually masked by plausible deniability or an exaggerated show of humility. Not exactly Gandhian principle of "true power speaks softly" but China rarely indulges in sabre-rattling even as under Jinping it goes about pursuing the 'Chinese Dream' and translating aggressively its might as world's second-largest economy into hard military power.
Its revisionist policies under the new "core leader" and leveraging of economic prowess into geostrategic depth and political weight-throwing has always gone hand in hand with a perverse modesty.
Not this time.
India's test-firing of DRDO-developed long-range weaponry that may carry nuclear weaponry deep into Chinese territory seems to have touched a raw nerve that prompted Beijing to launch an open threat and use the one card that it prefers to hide beneath its sleeves Pakistan.
The Global Times editorial wrote: "In general, it is not difficult for India to produce intercontinental ballistic missiles which can cover the whole world. If the UN Security Council has no objection over this, let it be. The range of Pakistan's nuclear missiles will also see an increase."
Beijing's use of Pakistan to contain India is nothing new. It has exploited the animosity between the neighbours to great effect. Whereas on one hand, it has built strategic depth inside Pakistan by almost-colonising the economically bankrupt nation, it has also propped up the warmonger Rawalpindi generals by supplying arms and military technology so that they may remain up to scratch in an arms race and keep India within their crosshairs. But in every step of the way, China has maintained a façade of neutrality. 

What explains the departure?
In his book Choices, former national security adviser Shivshankar Menon provides some valuable insights. According to Menon, who served as India's foreign secretary and was instrumental in engineering the 1993 Border Peace Agreement with China during the Narasimha Rao regime, the balance of power between India and China is of great importance to the latter. Though Beijing never shies away from pointing out the difference between India and China in terms of economic and military might, it is perennially worried about India inching towards some sort of parity.
The shades of this were evident in the border dispute between the two countries. While China had vastly improved its military and civilian infrastructure along the Sino-Indian border in the 1980s and 1990s, it became — according to Menon who served as India's envoy to China from 2000-03 — extremely annoyed when New Delhi tried to close the infrastructure gap and enhance military deployments and capabilities along the LAC. The Chinese, says the author, has been pressing hard of late for an agreement that would "freeze the existing imbalance" along the border.
Not surprisingly, this has become the latest flashpoint of conflicting interests and Chinese irritation has been further exacerbated by Indian steps along the 120,000 square-mile long LAC. As a Times of India report points out, New Delhi has decided to base 

[A] the first squadron of Rafale fighter jets at Bengal's Hashimara base from 2019 as part of "conventional deterrence against China". 

[B] Other steps include

( i ) additional Sukhoi-30MKI fighters,
(ii) spy drones & helicopters in the North East,  (iii)deployment of T-72 tanks in eastern Ladakh and Sikkim,  (iv)new infantry divisions, Mountain Strike Corps, Super Hercules Aircraft and the works, according to the report.
The Chinese threats, therefore, are an expression of insecurity that should help India gain strategic leverage against the Dragon.

RELATED:

Eye on China, India to base first squadron of Rafale fighter jets in Bengal 

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/eye-on-china-india-to-base-first-squadron-of-rafale-fighter-jets-in-bengal/articleshow/56384484.cms



        ******************************************

Deng Xiaoping’s "24-Character Strategy"

           SOURCE: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/china/24-character.htm&gws_rd=cr&ei=az5yWMm8IYPavAS8tLfABg]



Deng Xiaoping’s "24-Character Strategy" first emerged in 1990 in response both to the global backlash from the 1989 Tiananmen Square crackdown and to the CCP’s sense of alarm following the collapse of the communist states of Eastern Europe.49 The strategy provided basic principles on how China should protect its national interests while increasing its interactions with the world. The "24-Character Strategy’’ has been roughly translated as:
"Observe calmly; secure our position; cope with affairs calmly; hide our capacities and bide our time; be good at maintaining a low profile; and never claim leadership."
As stated in a 2010 essay posted on an official CCP website, "Hide our capabilities and bide our time, make some contributions" and related thoughts were put forward by Deng Xiaoping for the ‘special period’ of the late 1980s and early 1990s, in the midst of sudden changes in Eastern Europe and the collapse of the socialist camp. . . . Currently, there are people in other countries who have produced misunderstandings and distortions of ‘hide our capabilities and bide our time.’ These people believe that China’s foreign policy strategy has a long-term, undeclared content and purpose:
This is that China believes that its current strength is insufficient, and the time has not yet come to announce and implement this great strategy, and consequently must ‘Hide our capabilities and bide our time,’ concealing the true situation and waiting for the right time of opportunity. . . . However, this is . . . a serious misunderstanding and distortion of the ‘hide our capabilities and bide our time’ idea stated by Comrade Deng Xiaoping . . . the original idea of using the expression ‘hide our capabilities and bide our time’ was the strategy of ‘developing ourselves,’ and not at all to ‘seek revenge on others’ after we have developed."
CCP General Secretary Jiang Zemin continued this policy throughout the 1990s, making it a central tenet of Chinese foreign policy for more than ten years. The result was that China’s strategic orientation ‘‘demonstrate[d] unusual consistency from the 1980s through the 2000s,’’ with China’s leaders "insisting on the importance of sticking to Deng Xiaoping’s realist legacy."
The phrase tao guang yang hui, “keep a low profile” was used by Deng Xiaoping in the 1980s as part of a famous description of China’s foreign policy. Zhao Qizheng, dean of the School of Journalism of Renmin University of China and formal head of State Council Information Office, argues that some foreigners misunderstand the real meaning of Deng Xiaoping’s proposal.
But some foreigners read it as advocating deception about China’s true strength. Zhao maintains that “keep a low profile” is not a trick, but an expression of a particular approach. Yet other scholars point out that in a classical context, the phrase is used to indicate a strategic ruse. But the key problem is not in which dynasty or in which book the term first appeared or whether the ancients used it in reference to strategic trickery. The core is how to understand the context in which Deng used the term.
Chinese civilization is always developing and the context of the same word or idiom is changing, and our understanding of an idiom should follow its own development and changes. No matter how scholars of various dynasties understood the term “tao guang yang hui,” in the 1990s, Chinese used it to express the meaning of “maintaining a low profile,” focusing on developing China.
The Chinese people have traditionally valued “enduring humiliation in order to carry out an important task, self-reliance, hard work and plain living.” The Chinese like to believe they aren’t expansionist, colonial, or imperial, and don’t hit out in all directions to grab and keep territory.
The idiom tao guang yang hui could be translated as “to keep a low profile” in modern times and it could even be translated as “to be self-effacing.” However, it could never be translated as “to hide one’s ability and pretend to be weak” or “hide one’s capabilities and bide one’s time” in a modern context.
After 30 years of reforming and opening-up, China experienced rapid developments in all aspects and grew into the world’s second largest economy. The building up of national defense began to be modernized and the society is more diverse. A brief study of the background of Deng's 24-character principle will give people a better understand as to the meaning of "hide our capacities and bide our time". Deng made the remarks after the drastic changes in Eastern Europe, when people in foreign countries and in China hoped China to shoulder up the great banner of socialism.

In the 24-character principle, Deng stressed "never claim leadership". He said China will never claim the leadership, never seek hegemony, never seek sphere of influence, never practice group politics, and never interfere with internal affairs of other countries even if it becomes a strong nation one day. Understanding the sentence completely, one will see "never claim leadership" is the core of China's strategy for development. Based on the strategy, the Chinese leaders of new generation set forth the concept to build a harmonious world.








































































Friday, December 23, 2016

NIRBHAY SUBSONIC CRUISE MISSILE “An Utter Failure”

SOURCE:
http://www.defencenews.in/article/Nirbhay-Missile-Test-%E2%80%9CAn-Utter-Failure%E2%80%9D-219669?utm_source=NotifyVisitors&utm_medium=browser_push_notification&utm_campaign=NirbhayMissileTestAnUtterFailure


NIRBHAY SUBSONIC CRUISE MISSILE                          “An Utter Failure” 



 REFER TO http://bcvasundhra.blogspot.in/2016/11/nirbhay-cruise-missile.html






A flight-test of subsonic cruise missile Nirbhay from the Integrated Test Range (ITR) at Balasore in Odisha on Wednesday was “an utter failure”, informed sources in the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) said.
Out of four Nirbhay missions so far, three, including Wednesday's flight-test, have ended in failure.
On Wednesday afternoon, after the missile took off from Launch Complex-III of the ITR, it did not follow the required flight path.



“The booster engine in Nirbhay's first stage started working. The missile lifted off from its launcher. But it started veering dangerously towards one side in less than two minutes of its lift-off,” DRDO officials said.
The missile started flying beyond the safety corridor and threatened to fall on the land. So the “destruct” mechanism in its first stage was activated and it was destroyed.
The DRDO sources called the mission “an utter failure” because the missile started veering towards one side  in the “initial phase” of the flight itself. They said, “It is a big failure. We should have a thorough re-look at what has been done so far. Out of four Nirbhay missions, three have ended in failure.”
The sources ruled out any problem with the missile's configuration. They said it could be “a hardware failure” that led to the mission being aborted. “This is a hardware element issue. This is a reliability issue with a component,” they explained.
A successful Nirbhay mission would have lasted for more than an hour. In a normal mission, the contraption will take off vertically like a missile, then a mechanism in its first stage will tilt the missile horizontally and the first stage, with its booster engine, will jettison into the sea. Then the second stage with the turbo-engine will start cruising horizontally like an aircraft with its wings spread out at a subsonic speed of 0.7 Mach.
The missile, conceived, designed and developed by the DRDO, can take out targets 1,000 km away. It can carry a 300 kg warhead.

Previous tests

Nirbhay’s debut flight on March 12, 2013 was a failure. After 20 minutes of lift-off, it deviated from its path and its “destruct” mechanism was activated to ''kill'' it.
The second flight on October 17, 2014 was a big success. The missile travelled 1,010 km instead of the targeted 800 km.
The third mission on October 16, 2015 was again a failure. After 70 seconds of its flight, when it was cruising like an aircraft after the first stage had fallen off as planned, it lost control and fell within the safety zone.















Tuesday, November 22, 2016

Nirbhay Subsonic Cruise Missile

SOURCE:
http://www.defencenews.in/article.aspx?id=39351



REF TO ;

http://bcvasundhra.blogspot.in/2016/12/nirbhay-subsonic-cruise-missile-utter.html



After MTCR Membership, India to once again test Nirbhay Cruise Missile in Dec
                                  By
                   SPUTNIK  News   


Tuesday, November 22, 2016

What is a Cruise Missile : For details CLICK url  to read

  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cruise_missile 




Weapons: Why is India keen on developing the subsonic cruise missile Nirbhaya, when it already has the supersonic cruise missile Brahmos?



What can a subsonic cruise missile do that a supersonic cruise missile cannot?



The answer is the range of the missile which differs significantly from subsonic to Supersonic. As you may heard about tomahawk cruise missile, it’s a subsonic missile.


Let’s just compare Tomahawk and BrahMos missiles.

Range:
  • Tomahawk-: 1300KM - 2500KM
  • BrahMos-: 300 KM- 500 KM (only 20% of Tomahawk’s max range)
Weight:
  • Tomahawk-: 1600 Kg
  • Brahmos-: 3000Kg(Just double of Tomahawk)
From above comparison we can say that just to achieve the supersonic speed brahmos need to burn double fuel than the Tomahawk but it could only reach the 20% of max range of tomahawk.

That’s why India is keen to develop a subsonic missile.

for further reference you might go through these links

Tomahawk (missile)?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tomahawk__(missile
A sub sonic missile travels vastly slower than a supersonic missile. Therefore it'd take much longer to reach a target. And the efficient engine it has, compared to the supersonic missile would allow it to 'loiter' over a target area. In other words, once the missile is overhead and is put on a "loiter" pattern, the government can make a decision as to whether a strike still needs to be carried out or not. If they choose not to, the missile can be safely self destructed well above the target. Also, as explained  above  you do not need as much fuel and therefore as much weight to strike the intended target. This means that a sub-sonic missile can either travel much farther than a supersonic one or carry more ordnance.

(An image of the famous Tomahawk cruise missile. It is a long-range, all-weather, subsonic cruise missile named after the Native American word for 'axe.' Introduced by McDonnell Douglas in the 1970s, it was initially designed as a medium to long-range, low-altitude missile that could be launched from a surface platform. It has been improved several times, and due to corporate divestitures and acquisitions, is now made by Raytheon.)



(an image of the world's only in-production supersonic cruise missile, Brahmos. It is a short range ramjet supersonic cruise missile that can be launched from submarines, ships, aircraft or land.
It is a joint venture between the Russian Federation's NPO Mashinostroeyenia and India's Defence Research and Development Organisation(DRDO) who have together formed BrahMos Aerospace Private Limited.)
In cases where speed is not of essence, and to reach a target farther away or more heavily "hardened," (such as command and control buildings, Headquarters etc.,) a sub-sonic missile is necessary. In a hypothetical situation where we need to strike a terrorist camp, a sub-sonic missile can loiter over the intended target area and wait until it is appropriate to strike, inorder to minimise collateral damage and civilian casualties.

Also, by virtue of their slower speed, the sub-sonic missiles can fly closer to the ground using the "terrain hugging" (or 'nap of the earth') tactic and more efficiently evade enemy radar detection (because of the earth's curvature, radar waves after a certain distance will be unable to detect low flying aircrafts or missiles). While the advantage of a supersonic missile is its speed, which means reduced reaction time for the enemy, the advantage for the sub-sonic missile is greater range/payload and greatly reduced odds of detection.

The enemy cannot run from a supersonic missile, and similarly he would not realise what just hit him if its a sub-sonic missile
                                                




Has India’s recent membership of the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) made a difference in the indigenously designed and developed long range sub-sonic cruise missile ‘Nirbhay’?


India has to depend on indigenous technology so far because it was not a member of MTCR. This led to two failures and one partial success. The missile has recently undergone changes and Indian scientists are geared for a fourth test in December this year.

“A low-flight trial (Of Nirbhaya) will be held next month. This will be followed by two more flights. Work on the air variant is on,” said Aeronautical Development Establishment Director M V K V Prasad.

India’s Defense Ministry had claimed success in some operations that the missile had performed during its last test lasting over 11 minutes.

“DRDO needs to get over the critical challenges experienced in stability of the missile in flight over long range which has led to abortion of the mission twice so far,” defense analyst Brigadier Rahul Bhonsle (retired) said.

India had sanctioned the project in 2010 with plans to complete it after three years. Later on, Government had extended the date of completion and adds extra cost to the project.

Of late, it was speculated that plans to extend the range of Indo-Russian BrahMos missile may sink the Nirbhay project.

“Technically speaking a BrahMos with extended range and Nirbhay are two separate projects by different agencies. Thus the move to extend the range of BrahMos should not impact the development of the Nirbhay. What is to be decided is do we want two sets of cruise missiles – one with a range of 600 and another 1,000 kms? Is there an operational requirement of the two categories of missiles for the armed forces and is there enough money to develop both?” asked Bhonsle.

However, the Governments wants to provide full backing to a completely indigenous project as it will give the defense planners greater autonomy in production and deployment.






Saturday, April 11, 2015

India to buy Rafale Jets: All you want know about the Fighter Aircraft









India to buy Rafale Jets

: All you want know about the Fighter Aircraft


 [ CLICK THE IMAGE & WATCH]

Reuters

 

 

 

 

 

 

India to buy Rafale jets

11 Apr, 2015
Text: ET Bureau & Agencies

After a series of twists and turns, a multi-billion dollar deal for new Rafale fighter jets for the Indian Air Force has hit the last mile. In the initial phase of the deal with France, 36 Rafale fighters will be bought off the shelf by India and negotiations will continue for manufacturing more in India at a later stage.

The reworked deal - buying 36 fighters outright with the option for more could be worth up to $7.5 billion - has the potential of pumping in over $2.3 billion into the Indian defence manufacturing sector, a major chunk of which will go to the private industry.

We take a look at how the Rafale jets will boost India's defence capabilities


Recommended by    


 [ CLICK THE IMAGE & WATCH]