Friday, April 7, 2017

‘Brown Bag Lunches’ Whet Appetite For Leadership Ideas (R)

SOURCE:
https://swarajyamag.com/ideas/how-brown-bag-lunches-whet-appetite-for-leadership-ideas




How ‘Brown Bag Lunches’ Whet Appetite For Leadership Ideas

                   BY

                    Lt gen Syed Ata Hasnain(Retd)





 









SNAPSHOT

Try ideation wherever you are and try Brown Bag Lunches. I have not found a better management practice for effective leadership and creation of a congenial environment for functioning and thinking.


I first came across the term ‘Brown Bag Lunch’ while attending the executive programme of the Asia Pacific Center for Security Studies, Honolulu, Hawaii in August 2000. It was a three-month programme designed to introduce middle level government officers (not necessarily uniformed) of countries within the US’ strategic circle to various vistas of comprehensive security of the Asia Pacific Region.
This was the pre-9/11 period and I was serving in Kashmir. The Americans did not have much of an idea of Jammu and Kashmir, nor of irregular warfare, had never heard of 
Improvised Explosive Devices and felt that 
Islamic fundamentalism (the term radicalism 
was introduced much later) was but a passing 
phase. 

There were four Pakistanis who were attending the programme with me; one each from the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) and Pakistan Army, an academic and a joint secretary from Pakistan's Ministry of Defence (MoD).
The PAF and Army officers always received preferential treatment from the American servicemen. Whenever I warned the various participants (there were 80 people from 35 countries) about the impending dangers of Islamic fundamentalism, I was never taken seriously by the US establishment; even during one large international seminar on transnational terror. The only man who thought I was talking sense was the president (virtually the Commandant) of the Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies (APCSS), Lieutenant General (retired) Hank Stackpole, an outstanding Marine Corps General.
One good day, as good as any in sunny Hawaii, I was called up by the president’s staff officer to convey the General's invitation for Brown Bag Lunch during the lunch hour the next day to discuss Jammu and Kashmir and Islamic fundamentalism. It was to be a one-on-one discussion, but in the excitement of having been invited for the lunch, I forgot to ask the staff officer what was meant by Brown Bag Lunch.
I arrived at the appointed hour carrying my little plastic bag containing the usual paraphernalia of stationery so the staff officer did not ask me any questions. He ushered me into the president's office, where the lean and very intellectual General was already sitting on the sofa, awaiting my arrival. Lunch was open before him; a sandwich and an apple. I wondered what I would be eating. After some small talk the General asked me whether I would like to open my lunch packet before we got down to discussing the subjects he was interested in. I was not sure I heard correctly, but gathering my wits, I said I had carried no lunch with me because I thought he had invited me for lunch.
The General was more than amused. "Didn't they tell you, it was to be Brown Bag Lunch”, he said.
"They did, but I am not sure I understood what that means, neither do I understand what it means even now", I replied.
The General burst out laughing. "Oh, that is American for having a shared lunch; you bring yours and I bring mine", he blurted between his laughs.
"I am sorry, in my country an invitation for a meal means only the host brings the meal,” was my forthright reply.
That afternoon both General Stackpole and I went hungry having eaten half a sandwich and half an apple each but the tone and content of the discussion made up for all the loss. I told him that I was writing my dissertation on Islamic fundamentalism and my research told me that the Americans were getting it all wrong by kowtowing to the Pakistan Army, and not ensuring that the fundamentalist groups in Pakistan and Afghanistan were isolated and weeded out.
He was a little surprised hearing this from me, a Muslim, and said so in so many words. I had to explain that I was a soldier and attached nothing to my personal faith; it was only my professional orientation I was bringing to my analysis, but exploiting also my knowledge of the faith. He thanked me and asked me to submit a separate copy of my dissertation to his office, for him to read.
The programme was to end on 15 September 2000 and I was traveling to San Francisco and then the Mid-West on mainland US to be with family. I ensured that a copy of my badly typed dissertation was formatted by a local computer instructor (I was yet a novice at handling computers), refined for presentation and then submitted to General Stackpole's office. The date of submission which can never leave my memory, was a date now etched in the world's memory. 
                               It was 9/11,
 only the year was different. It was 11 September 2000, exactly 365 days before the world changed after the Twin Tower attack.
But that is not the end. It started with Brown Bag Lunches and must end with that. As the Military Secretary (MS) of the Indian Army in 2012-13, I was on the lookout for new practices for taking my branch to a much higher level of efficiency and functioning. I was one of the world’s largest human resource managers, managing a cadre of 40,000 officers.
Many new ideas were being tried, mostly based on thoughts of middle level officers. To keep the adrenaline flowing and allowing open ended intake of ideas, I introduced the Brown Bag Lunch system. One Colonel, Lt Col or Major of the branch would join me for lunch from 1pm to 1.30pm at my office. He brought his lunch, I brought mine; I benefited from the culinary skills of the MS branch wives, who ensured their husbands always carried some novelties; mine was a simpler lunch.
Meals apart, I have never had richer and more fruitful discussion on professional matters than during these sessions. We discussed affairs of the MS branch and of the Indian Army in general. The last five minutes were spent on generic issues. A notebook and pen was within easy reach for me to take down the wealth of thoughts I received.
These were my able subordinates, who I would perhaps meet only collectively and never one on one; Brown Bag Lunch had created the opportunity. Five ideas from the discussion were noted and later compiled for our conferences where all could analyse them. Some ideas were taken to conclusion and some others taken up for deeper study.
This is the world of ideation; if you do not practise it in one form or the other you really may be a deficient leader because one brain can never think of the range of ideas which are required for problem solving. The entire Army could do with many more ideas. I have seen ideation dinners being conducted in institutions in London and held a few in my command of formations too.
Try ideation wherever you are and try Brown Bag Lunches. I have not found a better management practice for effective leadership and creation of a congenial environment for functioning and thinking.
I have to thank General Hank Stackpole and that wonderful American institution, APCSS, for having taught me this. But in hindsight I wish the very fine General had passed on my dissertation to the American President.












The writer is a former GOC of India’s Srinagar based 15 Corps, now associated with Vivekanand International Foundation and the Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.












Thursday, April 6, 2017

GEO STRATEGY : Sino-Indian Strategic Dialogue: Differences In Strategic Thinking (R)

SOURCE:
http://www.eurasiareview.com/04042017-sino-indian-strategic-dialogue-differences-in-strategic-thinking-analysis/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+eurasiareview%2FVsnE+%28Eurasia+Review%29







Sino-Indian Strategic Dialogue: Differences In Strategic Thinking – 

                                By

                         Siwei Liu*



By 



India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi with China's President Xi Jinping. Photo Credit: Narendra Modi, Wikipedia Commons.


 


China and India reopened a new round of strategic dialogue in Beijing February. Admittedly, the dialogue has important implications for maintaining strategic stability in a changing regional security environment. But it has also revealed the differences in the two sides’ strategic mindsets. These differences feed into the trust deficit and will eventually weaken the dialogue process.

The Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Zhang Yesui and the Indian Foreign Secretary Subrahmanyam Jaishankar co-chaired the strategic dialogue held on 22 February 2017 in Beijing. During the seven hour-long talks, the two countries exchanged views on bilateral ties as well as regional and international issues of common concern. There is no denying that this was the right time for the two Asian giants to have such a comprehensive dialogue.
This was the first round of strategic dialogue held since the Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi took office in 2014. Before this, the two sides had six rounds of dialogue from 2005 to 2014. Therefore, there is symbolic importance to the reopening of this dialogue for Sino-Indian relations as well. It demonstrates that both sides expect to see a more stable and healthy bilateral relationship.

Similarly, the practical significance of the strategic dialogue is also evident. Tthe new periphery strategies of both countries – China’s One Belt One Road (OBOR) initiative and India’s Indo-Pacific strategy – to some extent, have caused discomfort to each other. In addition, the new security dynamics in the Indo-Pacific region also bring some uncertainties and challenges to China-India strategic relations. It was important, therefore, for both countries to reopen dialogue and discuss how to avoid strategic misunderstanding.

The dialogue attracted considerable attention in various communities in the two countries, including the media. Unfortunately, it seemed that the dialogue was very hard to conduct from a practical point of view. In fact, some Indian analysts have started to complain about the results and expressed disappointment that the dialogue did not address a series of issues that have troubled Sino-Indian relations as they stand today. Similarly, Chinese experts argue that the two countries should use the mechanism to push forward greater strategic convergence rather than get entangled in strategic differences.
The difference in strategic mindsets played an important role in the conduct and results of this round of the Sino-Indian strategic dialogue. Both countries represent ‘oriental’ cultures; however, China and India “think differently.” China’s strategic mindset is more dialectical, synthetic, and also focused on long-term strategic planning. It is quite different from the Indian mindset, which is more abstract, exceptionalism-driven, and in favour of pursuing practical solutions at the tactical level
China and India bring their differing priorities shaped by these different styles of thinking or approaches to the negotiating table.

The Indian side preferred to bring up sensitive issues like India’s membership in the Nuclear Suppliers’ Group (NSG), getting the UN to impose sanctions on Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) chief Masood Azhar, among others. It appeared that India preferred to solve current problems and differences before pushing the bilateral strategic relations forward.

The Chinese prefer to understand bilateral ties though a big-picture analysis. Fu Ying, a Chinese diplomat, pointed out that, “the two sides should see trees, but also the forest.” Although Beijing was looking to narrow strategic differences through the dialogue, it also was inclined to discuss strategic convergence, including prospects of promoting regional cooperation. Beijing hoped to create a friendly atmosphere for bilateral ties. Contrary to Indian thinking, the Chinese are looking at establishing friendly bilateral relations before addressing specific issues between the two countries.
Admittedly, this is not the first strategic dialogue between China and India and both sides seemed to be highly attuned to each other’s way of thinking. Not just that – the maladjustment, to some extent, also made them uncomfortable. Delhi was obviously disappointed that China disregarded its demands on solving some sensitive issues. Although Beijing tried to address Indian concerns – for instance, a delegate who was an expert on nuclear issues had joined the dialogue on the Chinese side – the Chinese were not comfortable with the Indian over-emphasis on differences between the two sides rather than focusing on the convergences. Beijing does not want to allow these differences to cloud the overall relationship.
Perhaps it is necessary that the Chinese and Indian sides unstudy each other’s strategic mindset more closely. This also includes a better understanding of the other’s strategic culture. The conduct of the latest strategic dialogue has shown that a more open and creative attitude is the only way to have a successful Sino-Indian dialogue.

* Siwei Liu
Associate Researcher, Institution of South Asian Studies, Sichuan University, China






Wednesday, April 5, 2017

Seven Days in Tibet : TIBET THE SPIRITUAL AUTONOMOUS REGION OF INDIA AWAITING TO BE LIBERATED

SOURCE:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXRBnnOyn1w



             TIBET THE SPIRITUAL 

AUTONOMOUS  REGION OF INDIA

        AWAITING TO BE LIBERATED

         [ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXRBnnOyn1w ]




Published on Jun 12, 2013


06/12/2013:

FRANCE 24 reporter Cyril Payen has been subjected to "mafia"-style intimidation from Chinese diplomats angered by an under-cover report he filmed in Tibet.


Following the first broadcast of his
"Seven days in Tibet" report on May 30, personnel from the Chinese embassy in Paris visited FRANCE 24's offices to demand that it be taken off the channel's website.

The demand was flatly refused by FRANCE 24's Editor-in-Chief Marc Saikali, while a request by the embassy to interview Payen could not be fulfilled as the reporter had already left for Thailand, where he is based.

On his arrival, Payen was subjected to repeated calls on his mobile phone (the number had never been given to Chinese officials) demanding that he present himself at the Chinese embassy in Bangkok and explain his actions.

Payen told the diplomats he would be happy to meet them at a hotel, but was told they would only conduct an interview with him at their embassy.

A message left on Monday was openly threatening -- Payen was told to stop postponing the meeting and to attend the embassy by Tuesday or else
"take responsibility" for his refusal to comply.

"Everyone has advised me not to go to the Chinese embassy under any circumstances, that it would be dangerous for me," Payen said on Wednesday. "The French foreign ministry and FRANCE 24 are following this case closely, but it hasn't been an easy time for me. I'm not getting more than an hour's sleep a night."


---------
05/30/2013 REPORTERS -

                            Seven Days in Tibet 

For more than 60 years, the Tibetan people have tried to resist the Chinese steamroller.

But how much longer can they hold out in the face of repression, military occupation and deepening cultural assimilation?

Our reporter Cyril Payen spent several days undercover in Tibet. This is his exclusive report on a region that is turning into a shadow of its former self.

                                           By

                     Cyril PAYEN / Pierre Vaireaux 

------------------------.

REPÖRTERS: International in-depth reports from the FRANCE 24 teams and our senior reporters from around the world. Presented by Mark Owen. Thursdays at 9.45 pm and Fridays at 10.10am. 

All shows: 
http://www.france24.com/en/list/emiss...
FRANCE 24 INTERNATIONAL NEWS 24/7
http://www.france24.com

















Tuesday, April 4, 2017

HINDUISM : THERE IS NO BEEF IN HINDUISM (R)

SOURCE:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ecCPLt5rE58&t=204s

    FREEDOM OF SPEECH & THOUGHT

                                   IN 

                           HINDUISM  

                                IS IT A 

                        BLISS OR CURSE








ONLY IN INDIA BEEF CAN BE DISCUSSED ON PUBLIC PLATFORM. TRY DISCUSSING PORK IN A ISLAMIC COUNTRY 
                                        & 
BE PREPARED TO FACE  ANY THING                                          LIKE THIS  


          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w6R9fFLF_xc
                            [GRAPHIC]


             ONLY LUCKY MAY BE DISPENSED AS THIS


          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xtk_5atPyrg
                                      [GRAPHIC]



          THERE IS NO BEEF IN HINDUISM



Published on May 27, 2012

For first time on you tube, the video that shocked all beef-lovers into silence!

Be an expert in less than 20 minutes!!

A short research film by Agniveer breaking the myth of Vedas endorsing killing of cows or other animals.


For more information, also read:

1. Animal Slaughter in Vedas
2. Sacrifice of animals in Yajnas
3. Killing of cows in Vedas
4. Meaning of Ashwamedha, Gomedha and Naramedha Yajna


For text and further research, visit http://agniveer.com/series/vedas-myth...





Why Hindus Don't Eat Holy Cow (Beef), 

important to Hindus, Freedom In Hinduism






Published on Apr 2, 2015

Why Hindus Don't Eat Holy Cow (Beef), important to Hindus, Freedom In Hinduism ~ Jaggi Vasudev
Yogi, mystic and visionary, Sadhguru is a spiritual master with a difference. An arresting blend of profundity and pragmatism, his life and work serves as a reminder that yoga is a contemporary science, vitally relevant to our times.

Why is the cow important to Hindus?

In Hinduism, the cow is revered as the source of food and symbol of life and may never be killed. However, many non-Hindus interpret these beliefs to mean that Hindus worship cows. This is not true. It is more accurate to say the cow is taboo in the Hindu religion, rather than sacred. This is just one example of the misunderstandings people have about the Hindu faith.

Furthermore, cows do not have an especially charmed life in India. Sometimes people around the world see images of India in print or on television, or they travel there, and see cows in public places, unfenced and unrestrained. From such scenes, they conclude that Indians consider cows gods, but this is a false idea and below you will find clarification on this subject.

History of the "Sacred" Cow
In ancient India, oxen and bulls were sacrificed to the gods and their meat was eaten. But even then the slaughter of milk-producing cows was prohibited. Verses of the Rigveda refer to the cow as Devi (goddess), identified with Aditi (mother of the gods) herself.

Even when meat-eating was permitted, the ancient Vedic scriptures encouraged vegetarianism. One scripture says, "There is no sin in eating meat... but abstention brings great rewards." (The Laws of Man, V/56). (Go here to learn about The Vedas.)

Later, in the spiritually fertile period that produced Jainism and Buddhism, Hindus stopped eating beef. This was mostly like for practical reasons as well as spiritual. It was expensive to slaughter an animal for religious rituals or for a guest, and the cow provided an abundance of important products, including milk, browned butter for lamps, and fuel from dried dung.

Some scholars believe the tradition came to Hinduism through the influence of strictly vegetarian Jainism. But the cow continued to be especially revered and protected among the animals of India.

By the early centuries AD, the cow was designated as the appropriate gift to the brahmans (high-caste priests) and it was soon said that to kill a cow is equal to killing a brahman. The importance of the pastoral element in the Krishna stories, particularly from the 10th century onward, further reinforced the sanctity of the cow.

Original Video :https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxPlm...
  • Category

  • License

    • Standard YouTube License

Monday, April 3, 2017

REPUBLIC IS HERE- ARNAB GOSWAMI







''REPUBLIC" IS HERE- ARNAB GOSWAMI 



  CLICK / GOOGLE  TO OPEN & LISTEN





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=shUlIpZ-E6Q&feature=em-subs_digest-vrecs






Who Is Narendra Modi?

SOURCE:
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/india/2017-03-30/who-narendra-modi



      Who Is Narendra Modi?











The Two Sides of India's Prime Minister