SOURCE ;http://www.tribuneindia.com/news/comment/the-modi-presidency-is-over/156150.html
VETERANS ARE ON THE VERGE
OF
SUCCESS ON THE ISSUE OF "OROP"
STAGE HAS COME IN THE BATTLE OF "OROP"
एक धका और लगा
FEAR IS A SURE SIGN OF SUCCESS
MAJ GEN SATBIR'S
FEARS
ARE RESTING ON THE EDGE
OF
THE BEGINING OF SUCCESS
WHERE AS PARIKKAR'S
PSEUDO BOLDNESS
IS THE BEGINNING OF COLLAPSE
OF
THE BABU-GIRI DEFENCES
FENCE SEATERS HAVE GOT NO PLACE IN THIS BATTLE OF "OROP"
Now listen what CHANAKYA has to say on the use of FEAR as a wepon of WARFARE
WHY MODI LOST BIHAR !!!
THE MAJOR REASON FOR MODI'S
BALLOT DEFEAT
IS
" OROP"
MODI FORGOT
CHANAKYA & RAJDHARAMA.
HE MISLED HIS OWN SOLDIERS
FOR
PERSONAL GAINS
&
HAS FORCED THEM TO COME DOWN ON THE STREETS FOR DEMANDING THEIR JUSTIFIED DUES
NO NATION ON THIS EARTH CAN NEGLECT
ITS SOLDIERS.
THE DAY RULER DECIDES SO
HIS DAYS ARE NUMBERED
MODI SHOULD REALISE THAT SOLDIERS ARE NOT IN THE
" GAME OF ELECTION 'JUMLAS' "
OR
" POLITICAL JUMLAS"
SOLDIERS ARE DEFINITELY IN THE GAME
OF
PATRIOTISM
AND
MODI IS ADVISED
WHILE DEALING WITH THE SOLDIERS PLAY THE GAME OF PATRIOTISM. SOLDIERS UNDERSTAND ONLY BLACK & WHITE. IN SOLDIERS LINGUA THERE IS NO GREY . MR MODI ON "OROP" YOU PLAYED GREY & THUS THE WATERLOO IN BIHAR
IF THE THINGS ARE NOT RECTIFIED THEN BE PREPARED FOR THE SAME IN PUNJAB, UP & ASSAM...........
PLEASE PLAY STRAIGHT ON
"OROP"
SAY "BLACK" OR "WHITE"
BUT
SOLDIER WILL NEVER ACCEPT "GREY" BECAUSE "GREY" IS NOT IN THE DNA OF THE SOLDIERS
OTHER MAJOR & MINOR FACTORS FOR THE DECIMATION OF MODI FACTOR
Bihar has reintroduced a healthy
balance in our polity
The clever and the cunning among the Modi ‘bhakts’
were prescient enough to enter a caveat by way of
an insurance: the Bihar vote would not be a verdict
on the Prime Minister. True, every analyst knew
that whatever be the Patna outcome, the Lok Sabha
numbers would remain unchanged. But there is a
message way, way beyond Patna because he opted —
so breathtakingly and so recklessly — to stake his
shirt in Bihar, the Prime Minister’s image and
stature stand considerably diminished.
The trend that began in Delhi early this year has now
consecrated into a new, definite mood. But there is
no joy in all this. Indeed the Bihar outcome has
hoisted the nation, to use a very old cliché , on the
horn of a dilemma. Narendra Modi is the only Prime
Minister we have, he still has three and a half years
left in his term and, yet, it would truly be a national
tragedy if his government gets rendered a hors de
combat.
It is sobering to observe that a sensible section in
the country was hoping that the Bihar voters would
rebuff Mr. Modi, which in turn would, hopefully,
induce him to reinvent himself. But it is too hopeful
a hope to expect Mr. Modi to change his stripes.
[ Mr Modi is incapable of a change because of
his - in punjabi "MAHEIN (Me, I ) - arrogance in
vernacular "अहंकार " ]
This pessimism suggests itself on three counts.
First,
what the people of Bihar -as also in the rest of the
country- saw was the real Narendra Modi. Abrasive,
abusive, acerbic, cheerfully acrimonious, a bruiser,
a street-fighter with a preference for the knuckle-
duster. A leader who is refusing to grow up. Perhaps
that is the only trip he knows.
During the 2014 parliamentary campaign his
massive media machine was able to bewitch the
middle classes as also theleading liberal intellectuals
to make them believe that Modi had put "2002"
behind him; that he had grown into a sober, rounded
personality.
Of course, even in 2014, the voter in UP, Bihar,
Rajasthan and Gujarat was wooed, subtly, to see
him in the old familiar garb of an anti-Muslim,
Hindu partisan. But the post-victory narrative
grafted a modernising halo around him.
The middle classes opted to overlook this unpleasant
part of his political persona and, instead,
applauded because he had promised to slay
the “MOTHER AND SON SARKAR”
In the 2015 Bihar, there was neither a ma nor a beta
for him to gore, though he did try to resurrect them
as the ‘enemy.’ Meanwhile the country had become
wise to Modi’s techniques and tricks.
The Bihar political antagonists led by
Nitish Kumar had read Modi loud and
clear and were ready to repay him
in kind: insult for insult, slogan for
slogan, gali for gali.
Second,
the BJP campaign in Bihar has done enormous
damage to the idea of economic growth. The choice
got narrowed down to the ‘social justice plus
development’ of the Nitish Kumar variety or the
‘development plus communalism’ of the Modi-Amit
Shah version. It is most regrettable that
'development' as the national agenda stands
discredited. It was all so needless but Mr. Modi
himself abandoned it; he did not stay with the
message. That too is no surprise. Because being
who he is, Narendra Modi put ‘vikas’ on his
rhetorical back-burner and began trading in
communal metaphors. He had no qualms in
invoking “the other community.” In case anyone
missed the communal pitch, his comrade-in-chief,
Amit Shah, made it explicit when he argued that
Pakistan would be celebrating a BJP defeat.
This was back to the familiar Gujarat rhetoric of 2002.This cultivated regressive relapse has taken the sheen off Mr. Modi as a new messenger of a new era of national prosperity. The prolonged Bihar spectacle has defrocked this self-promoted messiah of techno-nationalism, a man who can effortlessly woo the CEOs and other technocrats in the Silicon Valley and still practise pre-Partition politics.
VETERANS ARE ON THE VERGE
OF
SUCCESS ON THE ISSUE OF "OROP"
STAGE HAS COME IN THE BATTLE OF "OROP"
एक धका और लगा
FEAR IS A SURE SIGN OF SUCCESS
MAJ GEN SATBIR'S
FEARS
ARE RESTING ON THE EDGE
OF
THE BEGINING OF SUCCESS
WHERE AS PARIKKAR'S
PSEUDO BOLDNESS
IS THE BEGINNING OF COLLAPSE
OF
THE BABU-GIRI DEFENCES
FENCE SEATERS HAVE GOT NO PLACE IN THIS BATTLE OF "OROP"
Now listen what CHANAKYA has to say on the use of FEAR as a wepon of WARFARE
WHY MODI LOST BIHAR !!!
THE MAJOR REASON FOR MODI'S
BALLOT DEFEAT
IS
" OROP"
MODI FORGOT
CHANAKYA & RAJDHARAMA.
HE MISLED HIS OWN SOLDIERS
FOR
PERSONAL GAINS
&
HAS FORCED THEM TO COME DOWN ON THE STREETS FOR DEMANDING THEIR JUSTIFIED DUES
NO NATION ON THIS EARTH CAN NEGLECT
ITS SOLDIERS.
THE DAY RULER DECIDES SO
HIS DAYS ARE NUMBERED
MODI SHOULD REALISE THAT SOLDIERS ARE NOT IN THE
" GAME OF ELECTION 'JUMLAS' "
OR
" POLITICAL JUMLAS"
SOLDIERS ARE DEFINITELY IN THE GAME
OF
PATRIOTISM
AND
MODI IS ADVISED
WHILE DEALING WITH THE SOLDIERS PLAY THE GAME OF PATRIOTISM. SOLDIERS UNDERSTAND ONLY BLACK & WHITE. IN SOLDIERS LINGUA THERE IS NO GREY . MR MODI ON "OROP" YOU PLAYED GREY & THUS THE WATERLOO IN BIHAR
IF THE THINGS ARE NOT RECTIFIED THEN BE PREPARED FOR THE SAME IN PUNJAB, UP & ASSAM...........
PLEASE PLAY STRAIGHT ON
"OROP"
SAY "BLACK" OR "WHITE"
BUT
SOLDIER WILL NEVER ACCEPT "GREY" BECAUSE "GREY" IS NOT IN THE DNA OF THE SOLDIERS
OTHER MAJOR & MINOR FACTORS FOR THE DECIMATION OF MODI FACTOR
The Modi Presidency is Over
By
Harish Khare
Bihar has reintroduced a healthy
balance in our polity
The clever and the cunning among the Modi ‘bhakts’
were prescient enough to enter a caveat by way of
an insurance: the Bihar vote would not be a verdict
on the Prime Minister. True, every analyst knew
that whatever be the Patna outcome, the Lok Sabha
numbers would remain unchanged. But there is a
message way, way beyond Patna because he opted —
so breathtakingly and so recklessly — to stake his
shirt in Bihar, the Prime Minister’s image and
stature stand considerably diminished.
The trend that began in Delhi early this year has now
consecrated into a new, definite mood. But there is
no joy in all this. Indeed the Bihar outcome has
hoisted the nation, to use a very old cliché , on the
horn of a dilemma. Narendra Modi is the only Prime
Minister we have, he still has three and a half years
left in his term and, yet, it would truly be a national
tragedy if his government gets rendered a hors de
combat.
A person is 'hors de combat' if:
- (a) he is in the power of an adverse Party;
- (b) he clearly expresses an intention to surrender; or
- (c) he has been rendered unconscious or is otherwise incapacitated by wounds or sickness, and therefore is incapable of defending himself;
provided that in any of these cases he abstains from any hostile act and does not attempt to escape.
It is sobering to observe that a sensible section in
the country was hoping that the Bihar voters would
rebuff Mr. Modi, which in turn would, hopefully,
induce him to reinvent himself. But it is too hopeful
a hope to expect Mr. Modi to change his stripes.
[ Mr Modi is incapable of a change because of
his - in punjabi "MAHEIN (Me, I ) - arrogance in
vernacular "अहंकार " ]
First,
what the people of Bihar -as also in the rest of the
country- saw was the real Narendra Modi. Abrasive,
abusive, acerbic, cheerfully acrimonious, a bruiser,
a street-fighter with a preference for the knuckle-
duster. A leader who is refusing to grow up. Perhaps
that is the only trip he knows.
During the 2014 parliamentary campaign his
massive media machine was able to bewitch the
middle classes as also theleading liberal intellectuals
to make them believe that Modi had put "2002"
behind him; that he had grown into a sober, rounded
personality.
Rajasthan and Gujarat was wooed, subtly, to see
him in the old familiar garb of an anti-Muslim,
Hindu partisan. But the post-victory narrative
grafted a modernising halo around him.
part of his political persona and, instead,
applauded because he had promised to slay
the “MOTHER AND SON SARKAR”
In the 2015 Bihar, there was neither a ma nor a beta
for him to gore, though he did try to resurrect them
as the ‘enemy.’ Meanwhile the country had become
wise to Modi’s techniques and tricks.
The Bihar political antagonists led by
Nitish Kumar had read Modi loud and
clear and were ready to repay him
in kind: insult for insult, slogan for
slogan, gali for gali.
Second,
the BJP campaign in Bihar has done enormous
damage to the idea of economic growth. The choice
got narrowed down to the ‘social justice plus
development’ of the Nitish Kumar variety or the
‘development plus communalism’ of the Modi-Amit
Shah version. It is most regrettable that
'development' as the national agenda stands
discredited. It was all so needless but Mr. Modi
himself abandoned it; he did not stay with the
message. That too is no surprise. Because being
who he is, Narendra Modi put ‘vikas’ on his
rhetorical back-burner and began trading in
communal metaphors. He had no qualms in
invoking “the other community.” In case anyone
missed the communal pitch, his comrade-in-chief,
Amit Shah, made it explicit when he argued that
Pakistan would be celebrating a BJP defeat.
This was back to the familiar Gujarat rhetoric of 2002.This cultivated regressive relapse has taken the sheen off Mr. Modi as a new messenger of a new era of national prosperity. The prolonged Bihar spectacle has defrocked this self-promoted messiah of techno-nationalism, a man who can effortlessly woo the CEOs and other technocrats in the Silicon Valley and still practise pre-Partition politics.
No comments:
Post a Comment