SOURCE:
April 15, 2015
Speaking to The Indian Express, Major Navdeep Singh, a former President of the Bar Association of AFT Chandigarh bench said that the decision of the SC based on the appeal filed by the MoD makes access to justice impossible and illusory for veterans and widows since on one hand the high courts have been asked not to entertain writs against AFT orders and on the other hand there is no provision of appeal in the Act to the SC.
“The situation is in teeth of constitution bench decisions of the SC including the L Chandra Kumar’s case, Kartar Singh’s case and more recently the National Tax Tribunal judgement of 2014,” he said.
According to Singh, AFT functions under the MoD and even its members are appointed by the MoD and selected by a committee which has the Defence Secretary as its member.
“We request you to kindly abrogate Sections 30 and 31 of the AFT Act so that AFT orders can be challenged on the lines of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) thereby making justice accessible and practical for defence personnel, ex-servicemen, widows and their families,” said Singh in the letter.
Veterans Body Writes to
PM on Right to Appeal in High Courts
By
|
|
· Sumitra Devi, whose husband died
during Kargil war due to heart attack was refused liberalised benefits by MoD,
which are admissible only in operational deaths. AFT, too, dismissed her
petition but the High Court quashed AFT’s order and granted relief.
· Lt Nishant Karol of the armoured
corps died during a battle. AFT allowed the pension to parents only for a
period of 6 months prior to filing of the petition. The High Court set aside
the order and directed the release of pension from the date of death.
· Maj Arvind Suhag suffered 100
per cent disability during an operational move in Kargil area. AFT refused the
grant of war injury pension. The Delhi HC set aside AFT’s order and granted him
the applicable war injury pension.
All the
above cases show that the litigants from the defence community had a potent
avenue of appeal in the high courts across the country which has been taken
away by an apex court judgment last month.
Now, one of the largest
ex-servicemen body in the country has written to Prime Minister Narendra Modi
asking for an amendment to the Armed Forces Tribunal Act to allow for appeals
in the high courts.
Writing
to the PM, Major General Satbir Singh (retd), Chairman, Indian Ex-Servicemen
Movement (IESM) has said that the majority of litigants before the AFT cannot
afford litigation in the SC where an appeal is in any case not admissible
unless one can prove a
“point of law of general public importance”.
“We have
reasonable information to believe that one of the grounds raised by the
MoD/Army in the appeal for denying the right of judicial remedy, like other
citizens of India, was that fundamental rights can be restricted/abrogated
under Article 33 of the Constitution for defence personnel and hence a judicial
remedy under writ jurisdiction of high court would not be available. If it is
true that this argument was raised, then it is the most unfortunate that the
system itself is pleading for placing defence personnel on a lower pedestal
than other citizens and pleading before the Supreme Court that the military
community does not deserve the enjoyment of fundamental rights like others,”
said Singh.
The
letter goes on to say that it is not understood how the defence ministry
expects poor litigants, including disabled soldiers and widows from all over
the country, to travel to Delhi and engage lawyers in SC to fight their cases.
Most of the cases in the AFT involve issues such as disability benefits,
pension, minor allowances, pay fixation, ACRs etc and litigants would now be
expected to suffer in silence if they feel that they have not got justice from
AFT.
Speaking to The Indian Express, Major Navdeep Singh, a former President of the Bar Association of AFT Chandigarh bench said that the decision of the SC based on the appeal filed by the MoD makes access to justice impossible and illusory for veterans and widows since on one hand the high courts have been asked not to entertain writs against AFT orders and on the other hand there is no provision of appeal in the Act to the SC.
“The situation is in teeth of constitution bench decisions of the SC including the L Chandra Kumar’s case, Kartar Singh’s case and more recently the National Tax Tribunal judgement of 2014,” he said.
According to Singh, AFT functions under the MoD and even its members are appointed by the MoD and selected by a committee which has the Defence Secretary as its member.
“We request you to kindly abrogate Sections 30 and 31 of the AFT Act so that AFT orders can be challenged on the lines of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) thereby making justice accessible and practical for defence personnel, ex-servicemen, widows and their families,” said Singh in the letter.
First
Published on: April 15, 20156:45 pm
No comments:
Post a Comment